Losing Morgan Hurts us, but how bad? | Page 7

Mar 14, 2012 at 2:50 PM

9ersLiferInChicago
Veteran
Posts: 10,070

Originally posted by RDB4216:
I think we will miss his run blocking a bit. Moss has never been a blocker, and same with Lloyd if we end up signing him (). Stephen Hill would fill that void though!

This is whay I thinke we draft him in the first if he's there at pick 30.

Mar 14, 2012 at 2:53 PM

#92

nannite
Veteran
Posts: 368

Originally posted by ChazBoner:
was barely on the team last season and we did just fine.

Our defense and ST did just fine. Our offense was inconsistent at best, and atrocious on third downs.

Mar 14, 2012 at 2:56 PM

#93

ninertico
Veteran
Posts: 10,259

He certainly was a very good WR for our team, but OTC is correct. Lot's of splilt-end types in the draft all the way through each round. Not worried one bit. If we land Schilens, he would be an upgrade to Morgan, IMO, at 6'4". 225 VS 6'1", 215. Schilens has some serious skills as well. Can he stay healthy?

If we don't land him in FA, then here come the draft prospects: Hill, Randle, Jeffery, Sanu, Quick, Toon, M. Jones, Cruiner, Fuller, OR McNutt. That's some list right there!!!

Mar 14, 2012 at 3:22 PM

#94

pete98146
Veteran
Posts: 2,618

We won't even notice Morgan is gone next year. Appreciate all the years he played for the Niners but he was at best a mediocre wide receiver and they are a dime a dozen.

Mar 14, 2012 at 5:16 PM

#95

LasVegasWally
Veteran
Posts: 24,264

Not much if anything.

We did alright w/out him last year. We'll do even bettter this year.

Mar 14, 2012 at 7:41 PM

#96

CorvaNinerFan
Veteran
Posts: 10,401

I'm thinking, sign Manningham and Schilens...the former 'cause he's a real playmaker and the latter because he's a big, fast WR. A co-worker is a huge Raiders fan and said he's definitely worth signing. His numbers in Oakland weren't great, due in part to injuries and opportunities. So, to answer the question, the FO has a chance to not just replace Morgan, but to up it substantially.

Mar 14, 2012 at 8:32 PM

#97

KegBert
Veteran
Posts: 3,755

Originally posted by AXEGRINDER:
Redskins are by far the stupidest organization in football in regards to FA and the draft. They are f**king clueless. Their AFC stupidity counterpart would have to be the Raiders.

Not to mention they're spending money they don't have lol.

Mar 14, 2012 at 8:33 PM

#98

KegBert
Veteran
Posts: 3,755

Originally posted by CorvaNinerFan:
I'm thinking, sign Manningham and Schilens...the former 'cause he's a real playmaker and the latter because he's a big, fast WR. A co-worker is a huge Raiders fan and said he's definitely worth signing. His numbers in Oakland weren't great, due in part to injuries and opportunities. So, to answer the question, the FO has a chance to not just replace Morgan, but to up it substantially.

I'm really warming up to the thought of signing Schilens.

Mar 14, 2012 at 8:44 PM

#99