Originally posted by 190836:
Originally posted by NinerGM:
Originally posted by 190836:
Some fans are trying to be optimistic and relate this melt down to Walsh's 78-79 era. I like Harbaugh, but he is no Bill Walsh and Jed is not his uncle Eddie. I am wondering what is behind this lack of commitment to improvement of the roster. Are they trying to clear house? Do they really believe in the players that they have? Is Harbaugh's ego so big that he thinks he could win with this team?
So chicken and egg here - how did you know Bill Wash was a "genius" before 1981? How did you know Eddie DeBartolo (who wanted to fire Walsh at one time) was a good owner until the end of 1984? It's funny that most of the questions you're raising are nearly identical to the questions people asked about Walsh. Do I think Harbaugh is Walsh? Maybe - maybe not. However, I'd be okay with a Sean Peyton.
However, since no game has been played and we aren't even looking at a complete roster with the start of the FA signing period being yesterday, I'd say the team is far from the "we believe we can win with this team" assumption.
You and I been going over this for a while. Let me explain this to you in a simple way, so you can understand. I've been watching this team for over thirty five years. No one new if Bill Walsh was a genius when he was hired by Eddie. And yes, I know about Eddie wanting to fire Walsh back in the day. Like I have mentioned earlier. My problem is not so much with Harbaugh. But I do have a problem with Jed and John York. Any intelligent person should question the direction of this organization under this family. Its only fair. You on the other hand, dogmatically defend this ownership that have brought a losing culture and misery to this team. How many years has it been since we had a winning season? How many years has it been since we were in playoffs? I get what you are saying about the Yorks not being the ones who do the drafting and setting the roster. But they are the owners, they set the tone. Its their corporate culture that trickles down throughout the whole organization. If this thing doesn't work the way they expect it to work, what is your excuse then? So far our losses has been grater than our gains. Don't you think so? Try to look at this from a different perspective.
Okay Lowell, I got a question about your post: explain, if you can, exactly how the "corporate culture trickle down theory" works.
I.e., the owner, Dr. John York practices medicine. So his understanding of pharmacy and the use of drugs to treat certain conditions "trickles down" to the way Colin Kaepernick releases the ball on a pass, i.e., his throwing motion? That it? Or did I miss a step or two?
How about: Dr. York's "corporate culture" of his medical practice directly caused Scott Mcglouhan to overly indulge in alcohol, which directly led to the drafting of Crabtree, which caused the most recent foot injury that will not be cured until Crabtree actually makes an appointment to see Dr. York and get a culture done of his foot fungus so it can be (in)corporated into his training regimen.
That any closer?
Your "corporate culture trickle down" theory is unsupported and absurd.
John York followed some bad advice (including some from Walsh about who to hire as GM), and its taken years to overcome those earlier mistakes. He's not the first NFL owner to experience this phenomenon (see Lions, Detroit), and won't be the last. And his son, Jed, has also had some on the job training mistakes (hiring Singletary chief amongst them) but seems to have learned from them and is showing some promise.
Your "Yorks = bad juujuu" voodoo mantra is simplistic and nonsensical. How bout you try to look at it from a different perspective. If you can.
BTW, I like Iggy, he seems normal and writes some good, entertaining and informative stuff. Must take to his mother's side.
[ Edited by oldninerdude on Jul 30, 2011 at 15:40:03 ]