Edit: But still cool!
[ Edited by Leathaface on Jan 26, 2011 at 12:28 PM ]
There are 450 users in the forums
Originally posted by Young2Rice:
In 2006 it would have us take Rodgers #1...
Originally posted by jones49:Originally posted by Young2Rice:
In 2006 it would have us take Rodgers #1...
2005
Originally posted by BayStreamin510:Originally posted by jones49:Originally posted by Young2Rice:
In 2006 it would have us take Rodgers #1...
2005
Do you HONESTLY think Rodgers would've done better if he was in Smith's situation ? Having to learn 6 or so different offenses, injured shoulder, terrible line, no good receivers to throw to. Rodgers had Favre to sit behind for 3 years, same offense his whole career, has a pro line, & one of the best receiving cores.
Originally posted by BayStreamin510:Originally posted by jones49:Originally posted by Young2Rice:
In 2006 it would have us take Rodgers #1...
2005
Do you HONESTLY think Rodgers would've done better if he was in Smith's situation ? Having to learn 6 or so different offenses, injured shoulder, terrible line, no good receivers to throw to. Rodgers had Favre to sit behind for 3 years, same offense his whole career, has a pro line, & one of the best receiving cores.
Originally posted by OregonNiner87:Originally posted by BayStreamin510:Originally posted by jones49:Originally posted by Young2Rice:
In 2006 it would have us take Rodgers #1...
2005
Do you HONESTLY think Rodgers would've done better if he was in Smith's situation ? Having to learn 6 or so different offenses, injured shoulder, terrible line, no good receivers to throw to. Rodgers had Favre to sit behind for 3 years, same offense his whole career, has a pro line, & one of the best receiving cores.
He certainly wouldn't be as bad as Alex Smith. Could you really argue he'd be anything worse than a top 15?