
Remember that Billick couldn't get or develop a QB in about 9 years! Imagine we have been bad for 7 years! I don't think I can wait to have a good developed QB any longer sorry. Billick is not the answer.
There are 533 users in the forums

Originally posted by luis1985:
Nice another 5 years without a developed QB
Remember that Billick couldn't get or develop a QB in about 9 years! Imagine we have been bad for 7 years! I don't think I can wait to have a good developed QB any longer sorry. Billick is not the answer.
Originally posted by 49erThrowback:Originally posted by teeohh:
No head coach has ever won the super bowl with two different teams
No head coach has ever won five super bowls. But it may very well happen this year.
Originally posted by daWest:
as an HC from jan '99 - dec '07, billick's offenses have never been better than 14th in the league ('01) and beginning billick's demise in BAL in '04 was his team's 31st ranked offense...in MIN, that '98 record breaking vikes offense had a QB who could throw the deep ball and the fade route. they had one of the and the most productive rookie WR ever (Moss) who could bring in those passes CONSISTENTLY. And they also had one of the greatest possession WRs ever (CC)...unfortunately this 9er franchise possesses none of those things
we really dont want to go this route, i'm telling you...not unless you wanna see more of the same...billick won the SB w/ Dilfer. Impressive as one might deem this, i find it to be terrifying if he's hired to be the next 9er HC. Why? The fact that he's won the SB once with a mediocre QB, and the likelihood that he believes he can duplicate the success he had in 2000, with another team, structured, in many instances, the same way. We dont want 2-3 more years of so-so QB play, bottom line.
the reason this team resembles the Y2K ravens? the PWillis comparison to RLewis and a relatively unknown at the QB spot...the reasons for the reason above are complimentary of Nolan and Singletary, both BAL defectors...
there's just no sense beating the same dead horse...
we DO NOT want billick
Originally posted by tn9er:Originally posted by 49erThrowback:Originally posted by teeohh:
No head coach has ever won the super bowl with two different teams
No head coach has ever won five super bowls. But it may very well happen this year.
and which coach would that be???
Originally posted by daWest:
as an HC from jan '99 - dec '07, billick's offenses have never been better than 14th in the league ('01) and beginning billick's demise in BAL in '04 was his team's 31st ranked offense...in MIN, that '98 record breaking vikes offense had a QB who could throw the deep ball and the fade route. they had one of the and the most productive rookie WR ever (Moss) who could bring in those passes CONSISTENTLY. And they also had one of the greatest possession WRs ever (CC)...unfortunately this 9er franchise possesses none of those things
we really dont want to go this route, i'm telling you...not unless you wanna see more of the same...billick won the SB w/ Dilfer. Impressive as one might deem this, i find it to be terrifying if he's hired to be the next 9er HC. Why? The fact that he's won the SB once with a mediocre QB, and the likelihood that he believes he can duplicate the success he had in 2000, with another team, structured, in many instances, the same way. We dont want 2-3 more years of so-so QB play, bottom line.
the reason this team resembles the Y2K ravens? the PWillis comparison to RLewis and a relatively unknown at the QB spot...the reasons for the reason above are complimentary of Nolan and Singletary, both BAL defectors...
there's just no sense beating the same dead horse...
we DO NOT want billick
Originally posted by 49erThrowback:Originally posted by tn9er:Originally posted by 49erThrowback:Originally posted by teeohh:
No head coach has ever won the super bowl with two different teams
No head coach has ever won five super bowls. But it may very well happen this year.
and which coach would that be???
Sorry, four. Last night was a doozy and coffee hasn't kicked in yet.
Originally posted by 49erThrowback:Originally posted by daWest:
as an HC from jan '99 - dec '07, billick's offenses have never been better than 14th in the league ('01) and beginning billick's demise in BAL in '04 was his team's 31st ranked offense...in MIN, that '98 record breaking vikes offense had a QB who could throw the deep ball and the fade route. they had one of the and the most productive rookie WR ever (Moss) who could bring in those passes CONSISTENTLY. And they also had one of the greatest possession WRs ever (CC)...unfortunately this 9er franchise possesses none of those things
we really dont want to go this route, i'm telling you...not unless you wanna see more of the same...billick won the SB w/ Dilfer. Impressive as one might deem this, i find it to be terrifying if he's hired to be the next 9er HC. Why? The fact that he's won the SB once with a mediocre QB, and the likelihood that he believes he can duplicate the success he had in 2000, with another team, structured, in many instances, the same way. We dont want 2-3 more years of so-so QB play, bottom line.
the reason this team resembles the Y2K ravens? the PWillis comparison to RLewis and a relatively unknown at the QB spot...the reasons for the reason above are complimentary of Nolan and Singletary, both BAL defectors...
there's just no sense beating the same dead horse...
we DO NOT want billick
So with the personnel we have RIGHT NOW, which HC candidate will be able to fashion a consistently winning offense?
Originally posted by tn9er:Originally posted by 49erThrowback:Originally posted by tn9er:Originally posted by 49erThrowback:Originally posted by teeohh:
No head coach has ever won the super bowl with two different teams
No head coach has ever won five super bowls. But it may very well happen this year.
and which coach would that be???
Sorry, four. Last night was a doozy and coffee hasn't kicked in yet.
and Chuck Knoll already has 4 rings!!!
Originally posted by redmanc07:Originally posted by daWest:
as an HC from jan '99 - dec '07, billick's offenses have never been better than 14th in the league ('01) and beginning billick's demise in BAL in '04 was his team's 31st ranked offense...in MIN, that '98 record breaking vikes offense had a QB who could throw the deep ball and the fade route. they had one of the and the most productive rookie WR ever (Moss) who could bring in those passes CONSISTENTLY. And they also had one of the greatest possession WRs ever (CC)...unfortunately this 9er franchise possesses none of those things
we really dont want to go this route, i'm telling you...not unless you wanna see more of the same...billick won the SB w/ Dilfer. Impressive as one might deem this, i find it to be terrifying if he's hired to be the next 9er HC. Why? The fact that he's won the SB once with a mediocre QB, and the likelihood that he believes he can duplicate the success he had in 2000, with another team, structured, in many instances, the same way. We dont want 2-3 more years of so-so QB play, bottom line.
the reason this team resembles the Y2K ravens? the PWillis comparison to RLewis and a relatively unknown at the QB spot...the reasons for the reason above are complimentary of Nolan and Singletary, both BAL defectors...
there's just no sense beating the same dead horse...
we DO NOT want billick
When is the last time our Offense finished above 20th? If we were 14th in the league we would probably have locked the division up weeks ago and would be in the mix to represent the NFC in the SB.
Originally posted by LundyLove:
Marvin Lewis might help us get Palmer