Rep the Red & Gold: Shop 49ers Gear →

There are 415 users in the forums

Lowell Cohn's new article

Shop Find 49ers gear online
  • dj43
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 38,180
Originally posted by ttime1:
Originally posted by dj43:
Originally posted by TN-Niner:
Originally posted by Ceadderman:
Originally posted by leebert81:
Originally posted by ttime1:
Originally posted by Ceadderman:
Originally posted by 49ERSAM:
OK, I forgive the team's performance this season if they could make it to 8 - 8. But then again, I know I am just foolin myself to be keep believing that they could. Alex Smith is so inconsistent about his performance every week that it makes my azz hurt watching him play. Bottom line, no-go, delete this QB after they loose to the Rams.

What?

Why even bother?

We had a 1-6 record before Alex got benched. Defense was the cause of 4 of the losses.

Seattle was a trap game. How do you prepare for an Offense you've never seen? Alex played pretty well in the first half and the Defense was average into the 2nd Quarter.

The one game that really killed Alex was the KC game but be honest, that was Coaching at its worst. Every side of the ball sucked. You could blame it on the QB but you would only be 1/44th right.

So if you look at the games lost by the Defense(i.e. Saints, Falcons, Iggles) Alex actually played pretty consistently. He had turnovers sure. But only cause Sing's feathering the brakes all game long.

Ahhh but that's the price you pay when you're the number 1 overall pick and the fans are unhappy with you in San Francisco.

~Ceadder

This is one of the most dumbest post I have ever seen and is the exact reason why many 49ers fans dislike Alex. Coaching did not cause Alex to throw interceptions, miss open recievers and fumble away the ball! He doesn't turn the ball over and they win majority of the games they lost. In fact, he did not have a spectacular game today as most of his passing yards came from yards AFTER the catch and great plays by his teammates. He was off target on many of his passes and still dinks too much. To his credit,he did not turn the ball over today and hopefully this game will give him more confidence to lead this team to a victory on thursaday. Hopefully Crabtree shows up and give him more help. But for God sakes, please stop blaming his failures on everyone else!!! It's sickening.

It's just Ceadder being Ceadder. Yeah, the 3 games he pointed out where he claims the defense lost those games Alex had 5 TD, 6 INTS and a fumble returned for a TD. Our defense sucked so much they made Alex have 7 turn overs in those 3 games LOL. He is right about one thing though, Alex did play consistently...

And yet he belittles us "haters" that we are blind and can't see the truth.

LB

Hey pot, kettle called...

Y'know it's funny that you guys act like the Defense played well in those losses. They didn't. I've not now nor have I ever stated that Alex didn't have a hand in the losses. Yet the one consistent thing that we have is a Defense that when NEEDED to step up, they fell on their sword instead.

Saints game: Smith ties the game with a gutsy 4th quarter performance. The Defense just needs to hold up til the clock peters out and they can get into OT and with the momentum they had they could have won. Against the Super Bowl Champs no less. Play calling played a big role in the Loss as well.

Atlanta game, I agree that Nate was trying to do something with the ball, but when he saw that he probably wasn't going to get much farther, step out of bounds. Nothing wrong with doing so. He got them to within scoring range no need to force the issue. Great hustle by RW to pop the ball loose. Defense is winded and from then on all bets are off. A game needlessly lost due to the Bell Cow FilLosophy. 4 picks in 2 games and who is at the center of a good bunch of those? An ill prepared Crabtree. But if Nate goes out of Bounds the game is within reach. I won't trash Nate but that wasn't a good play.

Philly game. Defense couldn't stop a little kid from crossing the street with a bag full of candy to distract them that day. Did Alex throw picks? Yes, two of them one was a pick six. Don't know what he saw on that one but the 2nd one could have happened to anybody. It's the job of the Defense to keep you in close games. It's their job to keep the opponent out of the End Zone. I won't get on them for the P6 but c'mon dude you cannot say the Defense didn't cough that game up. Alex was put into the position of having to come from behind by the Game plan. Pretty much right off the bat, imho. Sing has this horrible habit of slowing things down when we get points on the board. He did it yesterday in the 2nd Half. Once Goldson took that 6 in we went right to Bell Cow.

You can't really hand Smith the Carolina Loss. He was playing reasonably well and then got demolished for the other shoulder to get separated.

KC Game? The whole team sucked that day.

Seattle game was pretty much Lost the moment we got off the plane. They knew us we didn't know them and we walked right into that ambush with flowers and candy for them.

The Raiders game he played pretty well.

Now pick your poison. Which games did HE lose. Be fair about it. I'll give you props if you can give me reasons why the Defense did what it was supposed to do.

~Ceadder

Excuses are like @#@##@, everyone has one and they all stink.

Like Bill Parcells says, you are what your record says you are. It is that simple. Alex has six years and not one playoff appearance. I do not care what the reason is, if it is lack of preparation during the week, coaching or that Jupiter is in Aquarius.

It is time for Alex to go. I wish him luck, but, please GO.
Your post brings back a graphic from the Eagles/Cowboys game last night in which they noted how Andy Reid has COMPLETELY rebuilt his playing style. Here is the gist of it:

Michael Vick spent 6 years with the Atlanta Falcons. During that time his completion average was 55% and his rating was 75. He acquired the reputation of being inconsistent and very inaccurate when trying to throw from the pocket. I recall most pro observers saying that he would never achieve his potential. He just wasn't a good pro quarterback, rather, he was a runner who played QB.

So he goes to Philly and Reid re-molds him and he is now one of the top 3 pocket passers in the league.

Now couple that Vick history and record of his career with the fact we KNOW how poor the offensive coaching has been here ever since Nolan arrived, and if one is to be at all realistic, they should recognize that a good coach can do something similar with Alex Smith.

So while I am one who recognizes that this team needs much better QB play than it has received in the past few years, I also recognize that this offense has looked VERY different since Mike Johnson took over as OC, and that Smith's mechanics are also improved. What we saw yesterday, albeit against a weaker team than Atlanta or Philly, was what I believe Smith is capable of doing on a regular basis if the offense is allowed to function at pro level.

We cannot be logically true if we criticize Singletary for poor coaching but expect that one of his key players will not be adversely effected by that poor coaching. You can't have one without the other.

DJ; you are a very good poster and more often than not, I agree with you. In this case however, comparing Smith to Vick is comical. Vick was a MVP before he went to Philli. Yes coach Reid has made a postive difference, but Vick's renewed comiitment to the game is what has allowed both to create a win-win situation. 49ers management should get an F- for not following Sing's lead to acquire Vick. He wanted him and developed his coaching staff in anticipation of getting him and he could have been gotten- this team woul be in the play-offs as we speak.

I believe that Alex needed to step away from the game for a minute. He saw what leadership skills that he had to further develop through Troy. It also gave him some time to reevaluate his decision making and his game. I find it ironic that some fans call Sing stupid although he has supported Smith and Smith has produced his best numbers under Sing. Smith's previous performace can not be blamed on anyone but himself. He made some very poor decisions and throws which significantly contributed to this team's losing record. He has the authority to change any play at any time and if he did not like the play calling, he could call an audible. I don't buy that it was the defense's fault; just as I don't buy it's the offenses fault why the defense remains on the field too long-stop the other team and get off the field. simple as that.

But, I am hopeful that Smith steps up his leadership (eg. instead of walking off the field mumbling when he did not connect with Crabtree- get with him and figure it out). I am also hopeful that he continues to not turn the ball over and does not rely too heavily on short passes. Defenses will take that away from him and he has to show the ability to consistenly throw long to win that chess match.
Thanks for the compliment.

Perhaps I was not as clear about WHERE I was comparing Smith to Vick.

My post was about Vick as a PASSER. Everyone knew he was a good runner but his passing game remained suspect through all his time in Atlanta. It was only after coming to Philly that Reid was able to bring his passing game up to where it is now.

Which brings me back to the critical point about coaching and the DIFFERENCE between Smith and Vick.

Andy Reid was perceptive enough to KEEP what Vick did so well and ADD the technique he needed to learn - sound pocket passing technique and much more sound fundamentals. At one point in the game last night they showed a comparison between the way Vick dropped back to pass and set up to throw in Atlanta versus what he is now doing under Reid. Instead of hopping back in his drop and standing stiff-legged, he became much more smooth and balanced. The change was subtle but what that change enables him to do AS A PASSER have been dramatic. After 6 years in Atlanta, and after many observers felt Vick would never be much of a passer, Reid has re-molded him into a very good, accurate passer. His rating is now 102 with 63% accuracy, both much higher than he was in his BEST year as a Falcon.

For Alex, OTOH, Nolan immediately commenced to TAKE AWAY what Smith did well and turn him into something else. So if the Vick example is of any value at all, it should tell us that a good coach could bring back the things Smith USED to do well and improve on the main thing - passing - after all, both players had the same amount of time in a system that was not making them better passers.
lol@ the notion of Vick being a good QB before he went to Philly. Someone needs to watch more film.
Originally posted by binary2nd:
lol@ the notion of Vick being a good QB before he went to Philly. Someone needs to watch more film.

He's did more in ATL than Alex has in SF and you think Alex is good.
Originally posted by DesiDez:
Originally posted by binary2nd:
lol@ the notion of Vick being a good QB before he went to Philly. Someone needs to watch more film.

He's did more in ATL than Alex has in SF and you think Alex is good.

Ouch.
Originally posted by DesiDez:
Originally posted by binary2nd:
lol@ the notion of Vick being a good QB before he went to Philly. Someone needs to watch more film.

He's did more in ATL than Alex has in SF and you think Alex is good.

Blatant fail. I've never said Alex is good. Also Vick never posted a passer rating above 80 in ATL. Alex posted a QB rating of 81.5 last year with Jimmy Raye as his OC. It takes talent to fail twice in such a short usage of text.
  • dj43
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 38,180
Here are Vick's PASSING numbers in Atlanta:
YR % rating TD INT
2001 44 62 2 3
2002 54 81 16 8
2003 50 69 4 3 played only five games
2004 56 78 14 12
2005 55 73 15 13
2006 52 75 20 13

Look at the numbers. Given the fact he had some pretty decent weapons with which to work with in Atlanta, it is impossible to say he was an outstanding, or even average PASSER in those years. Hi best year, 2002, he would only rank one spot ahead of Alex's current ranking in the league.

If anyone is willing to look objectively at the fact they both spent 6 years with teams that did not coach them well and had rather similar numbers, the point I am making is about HOW MUCH OF THE BLAME/CREDIT LIES WITH COACHING.

So to the point Cohn is making about how poor the SF coaching has been, I agree with him, and these statistics prove it.
[ Edited by dj43 on Dec 13, 2010 at 12:52 PM ]
Originally posted by Ceadderman:
Originally posted by 49ERSAM:
OK, I forgive the team's performance this season if they could make it to 8 - 8. But then again, I know I am just foolin myself to be keep believing that they could. Alex Smith is so inconsistent about his performance every week that it makes my azz hurt watching him play. Bottom line, no-go, delete this QB after they loose to the Rams.

Defense was the cause of 4 of the losses.

~Ceadder

Originally posted by dj43:
Here are Vick's PASSING numbers in Atlanta:
YR % rating TD INT
2001 44 62 2 3
2002 54 81 16 8
2003 50 69 4 3 played only five games
2004 56 78 14 12
2005 55 73 15 13
2006 52 75 20 13

Look at the numbers. Given the fact he had some pretty decent weapons with which to work with in Atlanta, it is impossible to say he was an outstanding, or even average PASSER in those years. Hi best year, 2002, he would only rank one spot ahead of Alex's current ranking in the league.

If anyone is willing to look objectively at the fact they both spent 6 years with teams that did not coach them well and had rather similar numbers, the point I am making is about HOW MUCH OF THE BLAME/CREDIT LIES WITH COACHING.

So to the point Cohn is making about how poor the SF coaching has been, I agree with him, and these statistics prove it.

DJ, you are absolutely right. He has become a much better passer under Reid. It is also possible that Smith may improve as well. Much of Vick's improvement resulted from a change in his attitude towards the game and with that change Andy was able to further develop his skill set. What change in Smith's attitude could possibly result in approved performance? I think Sing has identified it- his leadership. His current teammates want him to do well. They want to support him. So does the coaching staff.

I simply don't see Smith having the same skill sets or inate abilities as Vick. Unlike Vick he has never been a winner at this level. His worst season in ATL equaled Alex's best season in term of wins and losses and many would argue that Smith has just as much if not more weapons at his disposale. Vick is in the record books for both running and passing. smith is in the records books for most fumbles lost by a QB. Vick was the first QB to win in Greenbay during the play-offs. Smith has never beat GB, period. I think that a better comparison would be Orton, but even then he had more success with the Bears than Smith has had the the 49ers.

Some would say that a new coaching staff can make a difference. Well, how many has Alex had now? five, six or seven??? I mean, if you can't pick-up something from that many sources to help you eliminate the types of decision making mistakes and inaccuracies which plauge him through out his career, then IDK if one more will make a difference.

He does seem to have many attributes of which some are better than even superbowl winning QB's. Unfortunately attributes don't always result into performance.
Originally posted by dj43:
I wonder if Lowell Cohn even watches the game sometimes.

I agree we all need to temper our optimism as this was a Seattle team missing some receivers. There was a great deal to be optimistic about in today's game but you won't see it sitting up in the press box jaw boning with your fellow scribes.

To see why 49er fans can be optimistic about today's game you would have to have spent some time studying the offense in the Jimmy Raye era and then compare it to today. You should look at the pass patterns being run and the sequencing of plays (at least in the first half) today and compare what you saw to Jimmy ball. If you did that, and really understood what you were viewing, you would see that the offense in the first half today was impossible to compare to JR days. This offense actually had a purpose and design/style to it. It actually fooled LBs and safeties on the Seattle side of the ball. The OL actually had some blocking advantages due to influence plays. It was VERY different from that mess we saw in the first 7 weeks.

IMO, for the first time, we saw today what Mike Johnson can do with an offense. Up until the time Sing shut it down in the second half, Johnson was able to take the wraps off and just call plays that would work. Not every play was a big gainer but each play had a purpose if it was nothing more than probing to set up another play.

MJ couldn't do that with Troy because Troy didn't know the book well enough but with Alex he could run some things that gave us some insight, and, yes, some hope that we can actually develop some of the talent that is on this team. This is still the same team that the experts called the best in the division. Now that the training wheels have been taken off it showed today for the first time a new offense - one that actually looks like a pro offense.

Cohn gets paid if people read his stuff and hit his page. It doesn't have to be right. It just has to get some hits so the PD can justify its ad rates. That is all he did today.

Totally agree! Nice post....
Originally posted by leebert81:
Originally posted by ttime1:
Originally posted by Ceadderman:
Originally posted by 49ERSAM:
OK, I forgive the team's performance this season if they could make it to 8 - 8. But then again, I know I am just foolin myself to be keep believing that they could. Alex Smith is so inconsistent about his performance every week that it makes my azz hurt watching him play. Bottom line, no-go, delete this QB after they loose to the Rams.

What?

Why even bother?

We had a 1-6 record before Alex got benched. Defense was the cause of 4 of the losses.

Seattle was a trap game. How do you prepare for an Offense you've never seen? Alex played pretty well in the first half and the Defense was average into the 2nd Quarter.

The one game that really killed Alex was the KC game but be honest, that was Coaching at its worst. Every side of the ball sucked. You could blame it on the QB but you would only be 1/44th right.

So if you look at the games lost by the Defense(i.e. Saints, Falcons, Iggles) Alex actually played pretty consistently. He had turnovers sure. But only cause Sing's feathering the brakes all game long.

Ahhh but that's the price you pay when you're the number 1 overall pick and the fans are unhappy with you in San Francisco.

~Ceadder

This is one of the most dumbest post I have ever seen and is the exact reason why many 49ers fans dislike Alex. Coaching did not cause Alex to throw interceptions, miss open recievers and fumble away the ball! He doesn't turn the ball over and they win majority of the games they lost. In fact, he did not have a spectacular game today as most of his passing yards came from yards AFTER the catch and great plays by his teammates. He was off target on many of his passes and still dinks too much. To his credit,he did not turn the ball over today and hopefully this game will give him more confidence to lead this team to a victory on thursaday. Hopefully Crabtree shows up and give him more help. But for God sakes, please stop blaming his failures on everyone else!!! It's sickening.

It's just Ceadder being Ceadder. Yeah, the 3 games he pointed out where he claims the defense lost those games Alex had 5 TD, 6 INTS and a fumble returned for a TD. Our defense sucked so much they made Alex have 7 turn overs in those 3 games LOL. He is right about one thing though, Alex did play consistently...

And yet he belittles us "haters" that we are blind and can't see the truth.

LB

Actually, I think it is Alex Ceadderman Smith in disguise!!!! It has to be. You can't be this blind!
  • dj43
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 38,180
Originally posted by ttime1:
Originally posted by dj43:
Here are Vick's PASSING numbers in Atlanta:
YR % rating TD INT
2001 44 62 2 3
2002 54 81 16 8
2003 50 69 4 3 played only five games
2004 56 78 14 12
2005 55 73 15 13
2006 52 75 20 13

Look at the numbers. Given the fact he had some pretty decent weapons with which to work with in Atlanta, it is impossible to say he was an outstanding, or even average PASSER in those years. Hi best year, 2002, he would only rank one spot ahead of Alex's current ranking in the league.

If anyone is willing to look objectively at the fact they both spent 6 years with teams that did not coach them well and had rather similar numbers, the point I am making is about HOW MUCH OF THE BLAME/CREDIT LIES WITH COACHING.

So to the point Cohn is making about how poor the SF coaching has been, I agree with him, and these statistics prove it.

DJ, you are absolutely right. He has become a much better passer under Reid. It is also possible that Smith may improve as well. Much of Vick's improvement resulted from a change in his attitude towards the game and with that change Andy was able to further develop his skill set. What change in Smith's attitude could possibly result in approved performance? I think Sing has identified it- his leadership. His current teammates want him to do well. They want to support him. So does the coaching staff.

I simply don't see Smith having the same skill sets or inate abilities as Vick. Unlike Vick he has never been a winner at this level. His worst season in ATL equaled Alex's best season in term of wins and losses and many would argue that Smith has just as much if not more weapons at his disposale. Vick is in the record books for both running and passing. smith is in the records books for most fumbles lost by a QB. Vick was the first QB to win in Greenbay during the play-offs. Smith has never beat GB, period. I think that a better comparison would be Orton, but even then he had more success with the Bears than Smith has had the the 49ers.

Some would say that a new coaching staff can make a difference. Well, how many has Alex had now? five, six or seven??? I mean, if you can't pick-up something from that many sources to help you eliminate the types of decision making mistakes and inaccuracies which plauge him through out his career, then IDK if one more will make a difference.

He does seem to have many attributes of which some are better than even superbowl winning QB's. Unfortunately attributes don't always result into performance.
A big difference between Vick and Smith is that Vick was allowed to continue the free-wheeling style he had a VaTech. Smith, OTOH, though he was a playmaker in college he was coached from before he has even drafted that he would have to be something in the pros that he was not in college. Hence, even though Smith had multiple OCs and QB "coaches," he has always had the same dominant Nolan philosophy under both HCs. From a coaching standpoint, it was the same old dirty shirt no matter who was wearing it.

I am not saying Alex Smith has the ability to be an All Pro or even a Pro Bowl QB, but the similarities of what was being said about Michael Vick after 6 years with Atlanta are very much like what is being said about Alex Smith in SF. What is intriguing is that Smith now finally has some of the things any QB needs to succeed - an OL that is finally beginning to play, a couple of decent receivers and an OC that understands the game is no longer played in 3 yard bursts with a cloud of dust.
[ Edited by dj43 on Dec 13, 2010 at 2:31 PM ]
Well put!

Originally posted by ttime1:
Originally posted by Ceadderman:
Originally posted by 49ERSAM:
OK, I forgive the team's performance this season if they could make it to 8 - 8. But then again, I know I am just foolin myself to be keep believing that they could. Alex Smith is so inconsistent about his performance every week that it makes my azz hurt watching him play. Bottom line, no-go, delete this QB after they loose to the Rams.

What?

Why even bother?

We had a 1-6 record before Alex got benched. Defense was the cause of 4 of the losses.

Seattle was a trap game. How do you prepare for an Offense you've never seen? Alex played pretty well in the first half and the Defense was average into the 2nd Quarter.

The one game that really killed Alex was the KC game but be honest, that was Coaching at its worst. Every side of the ball sucked. You could blame it on the QB but you would only be 1/44th right.

So if you look at the games lost by the Defense(i.e. Saints, Falcons, Iggles) Alex actually played pretty consistently. He had turnovers sure. But only cause Sing's feathering the brakes all game long.

Ahhh but that's the price you pay when you're the number 1 overall pick and the fans are unhappy with you in San Francisco.

~Ceadder

This is one of the most dumbest post I have ever seen and is the exact reason why many 49ers fans dislike Alex. Coaching did not cause Alex to throw interceptions, miss open recievers and fumble away the ball! He doesn't turn the ball over and they win majority of the games they lost. In fact, he did not have a spectacular game today as most of his passing yards came from yards AFTER the catch and great plays by his teammates. He was off target on many of his passes and still dinks too much. To his credit,he did not turn the ball over today and hopefully this game will give him more confidence to lead this team to a victory on thursaday. Hopefully Crabtree shows up and give him more help. But for God sakes, please stop blaming his failures on everyone else!!! It's sickening.
What philly game were you talking about? He was terrible that game and then had a chance to win it at the end again and threw another pick to end the game.

I flew all the way down there and had to watch that garbage...I'm sorry but when the whole stadium is booing your QB in the 2nd Quarter for a second rate backup to play....Your sucking.

Your smoking some good stuff if your putting our problems on the defense...
Originally posted by Ceadderman:
Originally posted by leebert81:
Originally posted by ttime1:
Originally posted by Ceadderman:
Originally posted by 49ERSAM:


Philly game. Defense couldn't stop a little kid from crossing the street with a bag full of candy to distract them that day. Did Alex throw picks? Yes, two of them one was a pick six. Don't know what he saw on that one but the 2nd one could have happened to anybody. It's the job of the Defense to keep you in close games. It's their job to keep the opponent out of the End Zone. I won't get on them for the P6 but c'mon dude you cannot say the Defense didn't cough that game up. Alex was put into the position of having to come from behind by the Game plan. Pretty much right off the bat, imho. Sing has this horrible habit of slowing things down when we get points on the board. He did it yesterday in the 2nd Half. Once Goldson took that 6 in we went right to Bell Cow.

~Ceadder
Originally posted by dj43:
Originally posted by ttime1:
Originally posted by dj43:
Here are Vick's PASSING numbers in Atlanta:
YR % rating TD INT
2001 44 62 2 3
2002 54 81 16 8
2003 50 69 4 3 played only five games
2004 56 78 14 12
2005 55 73 15 13
2006 52 75 20 13

Look at the numbers. Given the fact he had some pretty decent weapons with which to work with in Atlanta, it is impossible to say he was an outstanding, or even average PASSER in those years. Hi best year, 2002, he would only rank one spot ahead of Alex's current ranking in the league.

If anyone is willing to look objectively at the fact they both spent 6 years with teams that did not coach them well and had rather similar numbers, the point I am making is about HOW MUCH OF THE BLAME/CREDIT LIES WITH COACHING.

So to the point Cohn is making about how poor the SF coaching has been, I agree with him, and these statistics prove it.

DJ, you are absolutely right. He has become a much better passer under Reid. It is also possible that Smith may improve as well. Much of Vick's improvement resulted from a change in his attitude towards the game and with that change Andy was able to further develop his skill set. What change in Smith's attitude could possibly result in approved performance? I think Sing has identified it- his leadership. His current teammates want him to do well. They want to support him. So does the coaching staff.

I simply don't see Smith having the same skill sets or inate abilities as Vick. Unlike Vick he has never been a winner at this level. His worst season in ATL equaled Alex's best season in term of wins and losses and many would argue that Smith has just as much if not more weapons at his disposale. Vick is in the record books for both running and passing. smith is in the records books for most fumbles lost by a QB. Vick was the first QB to win in Greenbay during the play-offs. Smith has never beat GB, period. I think that a better comparison would be Orton, but even then he had more success with the Bears than Smith has had the the 49ers.

Some would say that a new coaching staff can make a difference. Well, how many has Alex had now? five, six or seven??? I mean, if you can't pick-up something from that many sources to help you eliminate the types of decision making mistakes and inaccuracies which plauge him through out his career, then IDK if one more will make a difference.

He does seem to have many attributes of which some are better than even superbowl winning QB's. Unfortunately attributes don't always result into performance.
A big difference between Vick and Smith is that Vick was allowed to continue the free-wheeling style he had a VaTech. Smith, OTOH, though he was a playmaker in college he was coached from before he has even drafted that he would have to be something in the pros that he was not in college. Hence, even though Smith had multiple OCs and QB "coaches," he has always had the same dominant Nolan philosophy under both HCs. From a coaching standpoint, it was the same old dirty shirt no matter who was wearing it.

I am not saying Alex Smith has the ability to be an All Pro or even a Pro Bowl QB, but the similarities of what was being said about Michael Vick after 6 years with Atlanta are very much like what is being said about Alex Smith in SF. What is intriguing is that Smith now finally has some of the things any QB needs to succeed - an OL that is finally beginning to play, a couple of decent receivers and an OC that understands the game is no longer played in 3 yard bursts with a cloud of dust.

Two of the last three Superbowl winners had the three yard bursts with a cloud of dust theory. So, I don't think that Sing is too far off with that. The problem is that he does not have a team capable enough to impliment that theory while Smith has not shown the ability to be a gunslinger over a long period of time. The running game and the defemse has not been consistent enough to dominate. With Gore's injury he doesn't have much choice but to rely more on Smith. So I guess that we will see. I have not heard the simularities that you speak of between Smith and Vick. But I sure there is one thing that we can agree upon; Smith better stop thinking that he is Vick when he runs and either go down or get the hell out of bounds!!!
Originally posted by DesiDez:
Originally posted by binary2nd:
lol@ the notion of Vick being a good QB before he went to Philly. Someone needs to watch more film.

He's did more in ATL than Alex has in SF and you think Alex is good.

In pretty much the same Offensive scheme his entire career. He was just a Running QB back then. Now he's willing to sit in the pocket and be patient but still get out on the move when he has to. He used to take the snap and just take off more often than not. That was why Steve was asked to talk to him. I think people have honestly forgotten all about that stuff.

~Ceadder
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone