Originally posted by NinerGM:
Sure - the type of GM IMHO that the 49ers need is someone who has not only the experience of helping to build a franchise, but also has experience with drafting and interviewing, hiring, helping to construct good administrative and coaching staffs ala Ozzie Newsome or Scott Pioli or Ted Thompson (who learned from Ron Wolf). We need someone who has contacts throughout the NFL and respected enough where he can make a call out league-wide and get great people to work for him and understand who best fits in helping to rebuild this team/organization. So just taking a senior scout may be great for the draft next year, but it completely ignores the gaping hole that is the 49ers coaching staff (development) and lack of consistency. Scott McCloughan as GM was here for a while but through that entire tenure were the 49ers more consistent? Did Scott help Nolan build the team where if a coach was leaving, up through the HC, there was a competent replacement in place? An interviewing process that would help find the best person? I don't think that's the case.
There is no one in this organization in my opinion other than maybe Tom Gamble who has anywhere near the experience or ability to be the football executive the 49ers need at this time.
I'm not saying that you can't be a very good scout or rise through the ranks.
I think you're creating a false dichotomy that isn't there in my original post.
However, if you read the responsibilities of GMs, they're more than just a Scout-in-Chief and easily found. They're more than just great on draft day.
::hug::
[ Edited by Wodwo on Dec 6, 2010 at 1:03 PM ]
