Originally posted by Leathaface:Originally posted by Method:Originally posted by Leathaface:
You can always pick a handful of plays where the game could have changed.
The fact is, our QB never makes plays to WIN them. He's in position to make these "game-changing" plays yet he never makes them.
Instead, we get 2 INTs on crucial drives.
When you lose, it becomes a question of "who made less plays" or "who made less negative ones."
Our defense played great for most of the game, so you don't blame them as much as you blame the sh!t performance of Smith, who played horrid for the most of the game.
Totally disagreed.
Alex sucked. Everyone has admitted that, and you will never see me say otherwise.
When you're ahead 14-13 with 2 minutes left, no matter how you got there or who played poorly in the first 58 minutes, you expect either you offense to run out the clock or your defense to get a stop. It's a team sport, one player, even the QB playing poorly shouldn't constitute a loss when the defense had a chance to secure the win.
That doesn't make any sense. There are so many plays where the offense could have "secured the win." If you keep giving the Falcons chances, they're going to score. Why did Alex throw that INT before half? If he hadn't, we could have had another 3 or 7 and the Falcons might not have even been in the game in the 2nd half.
You can't pick the final drive and say that's the reason we lost and totally ignore all the other opportunities that the offense (Alex) wasted.
I didn't get to see the game so let me ask you this.
Why didn't the coachs play it safe and call a run play in that situation or did Alex call an audible???
