The Niners vs the NFC west | Page 34

Kilgore_Trout · 2010-09-19T18:06:22-07:00

Purpose: This thread will be updated at the conclusion of each week throughout the entire season. The purpose of this thread is to keep what is happening within the division in perspective. For example, after our Week 1 loss, many said the sky was falling. But what many also forget was that our competition is the Rams, Seahawks and Cardinals. This thread will track division standings, upcoming schedules, and all major NFC West related news. Standings After Week 15: Rams 6-8 (2-2) (W: WAS, SEA, SD, CAR, @DEN, @AZ L: AZ, @OAK, @DET, @TB, @SF, ATL, @NO) Seahawks 6-8 (3-2) (W: SF, SD, @CHI, AZ, @AZ, CAR L: @DEN, @STL, @OAK, NYG, @NO, KC, @SF) 49ers 5-9 (3-1) (W: OAK , DEN, STL, @AZ, SEA L: @SEA, NO, @KC, @ATL, PHI, @CAR, TB, @GB) Cardinals 4-10 (1-4) (W: @STL, OAK NO, DEN L:@ATL, @SD, @SEA, TB, @MIN, SEA, @KC, SF, STL) Remaining Games: Seahawks: @TB, STL Rams: SF, @SEA 49ers: @STL, AZ Cardinals: DAL, @SF Archived Weekly Standings: Standings After Week 1: Seahawks 1-0 Cardinals 1-0 Rams 0-1 49ers 0-1 Standings After Week 2: Seahawks 1-1 (1-0) Cardinals 1-1 (1-0) Rams 0-2 (0-1) 49ers 0-2 (0-1) Standings After Week 3: Seahawks 2-1 (1-0) (W: SF, SD L: @DEN) Cardinals 2-1 (1-0) (W: @STL, OAK L:@ATL) Rams 1-2 (0-1) (W: WAS L: AZ, @OAK) 49ers 0-3 (0-1) (L: @SEA, NO, @KC) Standings After Week 4: Rams 2-2 (1-1) (W: WAS, SEA L: AZ, @OAK) Seahawks 2-2 (1-1) (W: SF, SD L: @DEN, @SEA) Cardinals 2-2 (1-0) (W: @STL, OAK L:@ATL, @SD) 49ers 0-4 (0-1) (L: @SEA, NO, @KC, @ATL) Standings After Week 5: Cardinals 3-2 (1-0) (W: @STL, OAK NO L:@ATL, @SD) Seahawks 2-2 (1-1) (W: SF, SD L: @DEN, @SEA) Rams 2-3 (1-1) (W: WAS, SEA L: AZ, @OAK, @DET) 49ers 0-5 (0-1) (L: @SEA, NO, @KC, @ATL, PHI) Standings After Week 6: Seahawks 3-2 (1-1) (W: SF, SD, @CHI L: @DEN, @SEA) Cardinals 3-2 (1-0) (W: @STL, OAK NO L:@ATL, @SD) Rams 3-3 (1-1) (W: WAS, SEA, SD L: AZ, @OAK, @DET) 49ers 1-5 (0-1) (W: OAK L: @SEA, NO, @KC, @ATL, PHI) Standings After Week 7: Seahawks 4-2 (2-1) (W: SF, SD, @CHI, AZ, AZ L: @DEN) Cardinals 3-3 (1-1) (W: @STL, OAK NO L:@ATL, @SD, @SEA) Rams 3-4 (1-1) (W: WAS, SEA, SD L: AZ, @OAK, @DET, @TB) 49ers 1-6 (0-1) (W: OAK L: @SEA, NO, @KC, @ATL, PHI, @CAR) Standings After Week 8: Seahawks 4-3 (2-1) (W: SF, SD, @CHI, AZ L: @DEN, @STL, @OAK) Rams 4-4 (1-1) (W: WAS, SEA, SD, CAR L: AZ, @OAK, @DET, @TB) Cardinals 3-4 (1-1) (W: @STL, OAK NO L:@ATL, @SD, @SEA, TB) 49ers 2-6 (0-1) (W: OAK , DEN L: @SEA, NO, @KC, @ATL, PHI, @CAR) Standings After Week 9: Seahawks 4-4 (2-1) (W: SF, SD, @CHI, AZ L: @DEN, @STL, @OAK, NYG) Rams 4-4 (1-1) (W: WAS, SEA, SD, CAR L: AZ, @OAK, @DET, @TB) Cardinals 3-5 (1-1) (W: @STL, OAK NO L:@ATL, @SD, @SEA, TB, @MIN) 49ers 2-6 (0-1) (W: OAK , DEN L: @SEA, NO, @KC, @ATL, PHI, @CAR) Standings After Week 10: Seahawks 5-4 (3-1) (W: SF, SD, @CHI, AZ, @AZ L: @DEN, @STL, @OAK, NYG) Rams 4-5 (1-2) (W: WAS, SEA, SD, CAR L: AZ, @OAK, @DET, @TB, @SF) Cardinals 3-6 (1-2) (W: @STL, OAK NO L:@ATL, @SD, @SEA, TB, @MIN, SEA) 49ers 3-6 (1-1) (W: OAK , DEN, STL L: @SEA, NO, @KC, @ATL, PHI, @CAR) Standings After Week 11: Seahawks 5-5 (3-1) (W: SF, SD, @CHI, AZ, @AZ L: @DEN, @STL, @OAK, NYG, @NO) Rams 4-6 (1-2) (W: WAS, SEA, SD, CAR L: AZ, @OAK, @DET, @TB, @SF, ATL) Cardinals 3-7 (1-2) (W: @STL, OAK NO L:@ATL, @SD, @SEA, TB, @MIN, SEA, @KC) 49ers 3-7 (1-1) (W: OAK , DEN, STL L: @SEA, NO, @KC, @ATL, PHI, @CAR, TB) Standings After Week 12: Seahawks 5-6 (3-1) (W: SF, SD, @CHI, AZ, @AZ L: @DEN, @STL, @OAK, NYG, @NO, KC) Rams 5-6 (1-2) (W: WAS, SEA, SD, CAR, @DEN L: AZ, @OAK, @DET, @TB, @SF, ATL) 49ers 4-7 (2-1) (W: OAK , DEN, STL, @AZ L: @SEA, NO, @KC, @ATL, PHI, @CAR, TB) Cardinals 3-8 (1-3) (W: @STL, OAK NO L:@ATL, @SD, @SEA, TB, @MIN, SEA, @KC, SF) Standings After Week 13: Seahawks 6-6 (3-1) (W: SF, SD, @CHI, AZ, @AZ, CAR L: @DEN, @STL, @OAK, NYG, @NO, KC) Rams 6-6 (2-2) (W: WAS, SEA, SD, CAR, @DEN, @AZ L: AZ, @OAK, @DET, @TB, @SF, ATL) 49ers 4-8 (2-1) (W: OAK , DEN, STL, @AZ L: @SEA, NO, @KC, @ATL, PHI, @CAR, TB, @GB) Cardinals 3-9 (1-3) (W: @STL, OAK NO L:@ATL, @SD, @SEA, TB, @MIN, SEA, @KC, SF, STL) Standings After Week 14: Rams 6-7 (2-2) (W: WAS, SEA, SD, CAR, @DEN, @AZ L: AZ, @OAK, @DET, @TB, @SF, ATL, @NO) Seahawks 6-7 (3-2) (W: SF, SD, @CHI, AZ, @AZ, CAR L: @DEN, @STL, @OAK, NYG, @NO, KC, @SF) 49ers 5-8 (3-1) (W: OAK , DEN, STL, @AZ, SEA L: @SEA, NO, @KC, @ATL, PHI, @CAR, TB, @GB) Cardinals 4-9 (1-4) (W: @STL, OAK NO, DEN L:@ATL, @SD, @SEA, TB, @MIN, SEA, @KC, SF, STL) [ Edited by Kilgore_Trout on Dec 19, 2010 at 12:29:26 ]

Nov 29, 2010 at 9:26 PM

#496

StOnEy333
Hall of Fame
Posts: 99,663

Because we suck, dude.

[/thread]

The above videos are auto-populated by an affiliate.

Nov 29, 2010 at 9:28 PM

#497

sincalfaithful
Veteran
Posts: 27,712

see the NFC west thread

Nov 29, 2010 at 9:32 PM

#498

49erJim
Veteran
Posts: 21,524

I think we have a chance.

Nov 29, 2010 at 9:33 PM

#499

CalNiner49
Veteran
Posts: 5,719

With Frank Gore out for the rest of the season? no.

Nov 29, 2010 at 9:33 PM

#500

49ersalldaway126
Veteran
Posts: 14,549

i dont want to

Nov 29, 2010 at 9:34 PM

#501

Blitz
Veteran
Posts: 7,858

Playoffs!!!???? PLayoffs!!!!!??

Nov 29, 2010 at 9:36 PM

#502

zeppfan1
Veteran
Posts: 9,727

Can we? Of course

Will we? No

Nov 29, 2010 at 9:41 PM

#503

five1oh
Veteran
Posts: 357

Originally posted by Canadian49er:
1) Rams: 5-6 (1-2)
@ ARI
@ NO
vs KC
vs SF
@ SEA

--------------------------------------------------------------

2) Seahawks: 5-6 (3-1)
vs CAR
@ SF
vs ATL
@ TB
vs STL

3) 49ers: 4-7 (2-1)
@ GB
vs SEA
@ SD
@ STL
vs ARI

4) Cardinals: 3-8 (1-3)
vs STL
vs DEN
@ CAR
vs DAL
@ SF

Based on the win loss records and assuming we win our division games, we have:

STL losing to SF, NO, and KC, and a win against ARI. STL vs SEA, push. Although they should lose @SEA. (6-10 or 7-9)

SEA losing to SF, ATL, and TB, and a win against Carolina and Push vs STL, but probably a home win vs STL (6-10 or 7-9)

We would win our 3 remaining divisional games and lose to GB and SD. We will hold the division tiebreaker if we are tied at 7-9 with either or both STL and SEA.

Nov 29, 2010 at 9:43 PM

#504

49erfaninPA
Veteran
Posts: 33,463

not now.

Hopefully the injury to Gore doesn't give an Alexcuse to Singeltary to keep his job.

[ Edited by 49erfaninPA on Nov 29, 2010 at 21:45:35 ]

Nov 29, 2010 at 9:44 PM

#505

blunt_probe
Veteran
Posts: 21,260

Not without Gore.

Nov 29, 2010 at 9:45 PM

#506

dman
Veteran
Posts: 7,453

No

We will be 2 games behind Seattle and maybe St. Louis at the end of next week

Nov 29, 2010 at 9:46 PM

#507

StOnEy333
Hall of Fame
Posts: 99,663

Maybe the ball will get spread around some more now.

Nov 29, 2010 at 9:48 PM

#508

SanDiego49er
Veteran
Posts: 52,166

NO.

But this is the 49ers pattern.

~ Tank front half of season.
~ Rotate QB after QB.
~ Give false hope with later in the year winning streak.
~ Mess up draft position completely.
~ Just miss playoffs.
~ Keep Dingleberry for another year and say "things are going in the right direction."
~ Keep 1 or both Smith's for next year...

Can you see it coming again?

Nov 29, 2010 at 9:50 PM

#509

global_nomad
Veteran
Posts: 14,827

No way the Rams go 2-3 unless they truely can't win on the road. Bradford playing 3 teams for the 2nd time this season scares me.

Its the Rams to lose. I can see them going 2-2 the next for then clinching in Seattle Jan 2.

Nov 29, 2010 at 9:57 PM

#510

global_nomad
Veteran
Posts: 14,827

Originally posted by five1oh:
Originally posted by Canadian49er:
1) Rams:Finish 8-8 or 9-7
[b]@ ARI W
@ NO L
vs KC PUSH
vs SF W
@ SEA W

Finish 8-8 or 9-7

--------------------------------------------------------------

2) [u]Seahawks:Finish 6-10
vs CAR W
@ SF L
vs ATL L
@ TB L
vs STL L
Finish 6-10

3) [u]49ers:Finish 6-10
@ GB L
[b]vs SEA W
@ SD L
[b]@ STL L
vs ARI W
Finish 6-10
.