Official cuts 2010

Originally posted by jreff22:

Originally posted by MadDog49er:
Discouraged we cut Paymah and Maragos. I mean, if we are going to keep 11 DB's, why not 13, or 18, or 25.

Robinson was the biggest surprise of the cuts. But Singletary said his lack of versatility was the reason the club decided to go in a different direction.

"It came down to a decision based on productivity," Singletary said. "How much does he actually play on offensive side of the ball? We could not fit him in on offensive side of the ball."

Since Sing is talking about productivity, and we have 84 DB's on the roster, I guess this means we are going to play in many different defensive sets this season, including ....the 2-3-6 defense, the 2-2-7 defense, and the 1-2-8 defense.

Cutting a Pro-Bowl alternate at special teams for 4 DB's who will NEVER see the field. Very, very odd.

P.S. Looking forward to the Sunday de-activated list of 8 DB's.

Cheers.

Brock is a goner very soon....and I know you know that

And I know that you know that I know you thai I know you will get on AIM soon.

Originally posted by AB83Rules:

Originally posted by jreff22:

Originally posted by MadDog49er:
Discouraged we cut Paymah and Maragos. I mean, if we are going to keep 11 DB's, why not 13, or 18, or 25.

Robinson was the biggest surprise of the cuts. But Singletary said his lack of versatility was the reason the club decided to go in a different direction.

"It came down to a decision based on productivity," Singletary said. "How much does he actually play on offensive side of the ball? We could not fit him in on offensive side of the ball."

Since Sing is talking about productivity, and we have 84 DB's on the roster, I guess this means we are going to play in many different defensive sets this season, including ....the 2-3-6 defense, the 2-2-7 defense, and the 1-2-8 defense.

Cutting a Pro-Bowl alternate at special teams for 4 DB's who will NEVER see the field. Very, very odd.

P.S. Looking forward to the Sunday de-activated list of 8 DB's.

Cheers.

Brock is a goner very soon....and I know you know that

And I know that you know that I know you thai I know you will get on AIM soon.

I know that I'm on AIM and I know that you are not and I know that you know that you are not but know that I am.

Originally posted by HessianDud:

Originally posted by GhostofFredDean74:

Originally posted by MadDog49er:
Discouraged we cut Paymah and Maragos. I mean, if we are going to keep 11 DB's, why not 13, or 18, or 25.

Robinson was the biggest surprise of the cuts. But Singletary said his lack of versatility was the reason the club decided to go in a different direction.

"It came down to a decision based on productivity," Singletary said. "How much does he actually play on offensive side of the ball? We could not fit him in on offensive side of the ball."

Since Sing is talking about productivity, and we have 84 DB's on the roster, I guess this means we are going to play in many different defensive sets this season, including ....the 2-3-6 defense, the 2-2-7 defense, and the 1-2-8 defense.

Cutting a Pro-Bowl alternate at special teams for 4 DB's who will NEVER see the field. Very, very odd.

P.S. Looking forward to the Sunday de-activated list of 8 DB's.

Cheers.

Thinking could be to keep a guy like Brock around for a few days and let teams establish their rosters/practice squads. Then pick up a veteran ILB from the trash heap, release Brock and put him on the PS (might be a little easier to sneak him through at that point).

i don't think that Brock needs to be snuck. I mean, he's an UDFA who didn't play that much or necessarily light it up in the preseason. He played well, but its not like he was so good that the team can't afford to lose him. IDK, MadDog is right that its strange to keep so many DB's, so few ILB's, and to ditch your ST captain...I do think Brock will be the first one released if there is someone else on the wire that we want, and I think he'll clear and end up on the PS.

You could be right...but he was obviously impressive enough in camp to keep the guy around in favor of some name veterans. Not saying he lives on Revis Island or anything, but they clearly like him.

Originally posted by GhostofFredDean74:

Originally posted by HessianDud:

Originally posted by GhostofFredDean74:

Originally posted by MadDog49er:
Discouraged we cut Paymah and Maragos. I mean, if we are going to keep 11 DB's, why not 13, or 18, or 25.

Robinson was the biggest surprise of the cuts. But Singletary said his lack of versatility was the reason the club decided to go in a different direction.

"It came down to a decision based on productivity," Singletary said. "How much does he actually play on offensive side of the ball? We could not fit him in on offensive side of the ball."

Since Sing is talking about productivity, and we have 84 DB's on the roster, I guess this means we are going to play in many different defensive sets this season, including ....the 2-3-6 defense, the 2-2-7 defense, and the 1-2-8 defense.

Cutting a Pro-Bowl alternate at special teams for 4 DB's who will NEVER see the field. Very, very odd.

P.S. Looking forward to the Sunday de-activated list of 8 DB's.

Cheers.

Thinking could be to keep a guy like Brock around for a few days and let teams establish their rosters/practice squads. Then pick up a veteran ILB from the trash heap, release Brock and put him on the PS (might be a little easier to sneak him through at that point).

i don't think that Brock needs to be snuck. I mean, he's an UDFA who didn't play that much or necessarily light it up in the preseason. He played well, but its not like he was so good that the team can't afford to lose him. IDK, MadDog is right that its strange to keep so many DB's, so few ILB's, and to ditch your ST captain...I do think Brock will be the first one released if there is someone else on the wire that we want, and I think he'll clear and end up on the PS.

You could be right...but he was obviously impressive enough in camp to keep the guy around in favor of some name veterans. Not saying he lives on Revis Island or anything, but they clearly like him.

I actually think Brock might stick, maybe after James gets healthy, maybe we cut James if Brock gets some PT on ST's.

It is unsual to keep 11 DB's. But we have an aging SS in Michael Lewis, with concussion history.

ILB wise, people forgety Brooks can easily play Inside, he if healthy would be in there if Spikes or Willis went down IMO. But Bowman is gonna be a beast, so no dissrespect towards him.

Originally posted by GhostofFredDean74:

Originally posted by HessianDud:

Originally posted by GhostofFredDean74:

Originally posted by MadDog49er:
Discouraged we cut Paymah and Maragos. I mean, if we are going to keep 11 DB's, why not 13, or 18, or 25.

Robinson was the biggest surprise of the cuts. But Singletary said his lack of versatility was the reason the club decided to go in a different direction.

"It came down to a decision based on productivity," Singletary said. "How much does he actually play on offensive side of the ball? We could not fit him in on offensive side of the ball."

Since Sing is talking about productivity, and we have 84 DB's on the roster, I guess this means we are going to play in many different defensive sets this season, including ....the 2-3-6 defense, the 2-2-7 defense, and the 1-2-8 defense.

Cutting a Pro-Bowl alternate at special teams for 4 DB's who will NEVER see the field. Very, very odd.

P.S. Looking forward to the Sunday de-activated list of 8 DB's.

Cheers.

Thinking could be to keep a guy like Brock around for a few days and let teams establish their rosters/practice squads. Then pick up a veteran ILB from the trash heap, release Brock and put him on the PS (might be a little easier to sneak him through at that point).

i don't think that Brock needs to be snuck. I mean, he's an UDFA who didn't play that much or necessarily light it up in the preseason. He played well, but its not like he was so good that the team can't afford to lose him. IDK, MadDog is right that its strange to keep so many DB's, so few ILB's, and to ditch your ST captain...I do think Brock will be the first one released if there is someone else on the wire that we want, and I think he'll clear and end up on the PS.

You could be right...but he was obviously impressive enough in camp to keep the guy around in favor of some name veterans. Not saying he lives on Revis Island or anything, but they clearly like him.

true, but when the dust settles I still think he'll be on our PS. If not, I can't imagine he suits up on most gamedays. IDK, the numbers on D don't make a lot of sense right now. I am glad that we have legit depth at S, and CB has been an issue for a long time, really, so it doesn't bother me to try and shore that up for the longhaul (considering Nate is probably gone after this year), but we're going to need a 4th ILB at some point...I like the fact that they kept the players that they thought were the best, with a mix of vets and young guys...

Nothing against Brock, but I still kinda feel like I would have rather they kept a guy who had a better chance of staying on the team this year, and then, if someone else became available that they felt they HAD to have, they could make the tough decision then.

Safeties: Not only will Michael Lewis almost surely be gone next year, but Goldson might price himself off the club too. They're being prudent to keep next year's 3rd safety if as they say it takes two to three years to make an impact at safety. Do you really want to be in the market for another Mark Roman next winter?

Corner: We face a lot of 4 wide-outs now - even if we don't do it ourselves. Clements probably won't be here next year (unless he restructures). So going for young TALENT over veteran journeymen is a good move in my book. And even if Adams and Brock aren't quite ready, they can use James and work the newbies in slowly.

ILB: this says they have a lot of confidence in Bowman! He was all over the field yesterday!

how the hell did Curtis Taylor make the team over hard workers like Tufuaku and Walker?

Originally posted by valrod33:

Originally posted by jreff22:
JasonLaCanfora

49ers are already down to 53-man roster. Just announced 22 cuts to reach the number a day ahead of the roster deadline.

where is the list mr Jason La Cantina

lol La Cantina,

Id rather have seen Norris go than Cahlric or MRob

Originally posted by WINiner:
Id rather have seen Norris go than Cahlric or MRob

Umm Gore wouldn't, and I think that matters more.

Originally posted by TheNef77:

Originally posted by mayo63:

Originally posted by susweel:

Originally posted by PERUVIAN49ERS:
HERE....IN LIMA - PERU IS 2 HOURS MORE THAN SF .....

I HOPE FINISH MI REPORT TO GO HOME AND PLAY MADDEN 11 ALL NIGHT

Screw the report just play madden.

PERU can speak english, too.

Looks like he just used google translate with the grammar.

Anyways, the only guy on that list that I wished we had room for is Will Tukuafu. Just ask Toby Gerhart about Will Tukuafu.

DEAR FRIEND.....I`M NOT USING GOOGLE TRANSLATOR OK?????......I KNOW A LITTLE BIT OF ENGLISH I`M SURE YOU CAN`T SPEAK 2 WORDS IN SPANNISH WHITOUT A TRANSLATOR.......HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ....JUST KIDDING

Can't believe Jason Hill and Michael Robinson gone.

Originally posted by WestCoast:

Originally posted by WINiner:
Id rather have seen Norris go than Cahlric or MRob

Umm Gore wouldn't, and I think that matters more.

It isn't about Gore, it's about the team.

Originally posted by jrg:
Can't believe Jason Hill and Michael Robinson gone.

Me too. I thought Jason Hill might be a casualty as the Nines were getting WR heavy. I thought Robinson would still be on the roster though.

Oh well - best of luck to the both of them.

Originally posted by jrg:
Can't believe Jason Hill and Michael Robinson gone.

I think both will land on an NFL roster somewhere. It is a good sign that we have the depth to release them.