Two QB's?

Originally posted by znk916:

Originally posted by TonyStarks:
Having only 2 qb's would be too radical and risky even for Sing.

I wouldn't mind it , but it's risky.

how is it risky? Mike Rob would probably be the emergency QB if somehow we manage to lose both Smith and Carr in the same game...which I doubt since our OL should be much improved.

It's like an NFL professional coaching unwritten rule IMO

If Smithers sucks it up or gets hurt again, Carr will fail, and ......MRob?

I say cut Nate Davis and sign Matt Leinart to the #2 spot. Matt has everything you need in a #2, cautious check-downs and steller #2 QB mediocrity to win a couple of games (and it will come at a cheap price).

Originally posted by znk916:

Originally posted by TonyStarks:
Having only 2 qb's would be too radical and risky even for Sing.

I wouldn't mind it , but it's risky.

how is it risky? Mike Rob would probably be the emergency QB if somehow we manage to lose both Smith and Carr in the same game...which I doubt since our OL should be much improved.

Smith could easily go down for multiple games and Carr could get hurt in one of those games.

Then we'd be totally screwed.

Originally posted by WestCoast:
Cut Carr, pickup Leinart

Smith
Leinart
Davis

lmao captain checkdown, no thanks

Originally posted by 49erRider:

Originally posted by TonyStarks:
Having only 2 qb's would be too radical and risky even for Sing.

I wouldn't mind it , but it's risky.

As someone stated before, keeping only 2 QBs means we're only 2 plays away from having Michael Robinson at QB. At that point, we have no chance whatsoever.

Well s**t, didn't we have 3qbs when we had to pick up Chris Weinke?

why do people want to bring in Leinart? That guy is a joke.

Originally posted by znk916:

Originally posted by WestCoast:
Cut Carr, pickup Leinart

Smith
Leinart
Davis

lmao captain checkdown, no thanks

What exactly do you think Carr is going to do if he goes in?

That's right, a bunch of checkdowns.

Originally posted by teeohh:

Originally posted by 49erRider:

Originally posted by TonyStarks:
Having only 2 qb's would be too radical and risky even for Sing.

I wouldn't mind it , but it's risky.

As someone stated before, keeping only 2 QBs means we're only 2 plays away from having Michael Robinson at QB. At that point, we have no chance whatsoever.

Well s**t, didn't we have 3qbs when we had to pick up Chris Weinke?

Wasn't Smith done for the season by then?

Originally posted by HessianDud:
why do people want to bring in Leinart? That guy is a joke.

Because he's no more of a joke than David Carr.

Actually, Leinart >>>> Carr

Originally posted by teeohh:

Originally posted by 49erRider:

Originally posted by TonyStarks:
Having only 2 qb's would be too radical and risky even for Sing.

I wouldn't mind it , but it's risky.

As someone stated before, keeping only 2 QBs means we're only 2 plays away from having Michael Robinson at QB. At that point, we have no chance whatsoever.

Well s**t, didn't we have 3qbs when we had to pick up Chris Weinke?

That wasn't the guy on The Bachelor or some sh*t?

Palmer

Originally posted by HessianDud:
why do people want to bring in Leinart? That guy is a joke.

But in a "funny" ha-ha" way! It'd be awesome seeing the players help him to the huddle after a late-night drinking binge!

Alex Smith
David Carr
Matt Leinart


all on the same team?

that has to be a first in NFL History...lol.

I think you guys are really panicking too much about the possibility of losing him to another team if we send him to PS. His value is probably lower now than it was two years ago since he has failed to address the concerns that teams had about him during the draft.

Quote:
Davis should be nervous. There's no excuse for a third-string player with a learning disability to fall short on effort/preparation. Seems to me the 49ers could use his roster spot for a player better prepared to help the team. They could probably always sign Davis to their practice squad. I wouldn't expect another team to add him to its 53-man roster.

LOL cut Nate. Smith gets 6 years and Davis one to prove himself. This is:

B.A.L.O.G.N.E.Y.

i love how all of us see players for what they're really worth, i mean we should all be GM's because apparently the coaching staff that the Yorks have hired have no idea what Nate Davis is really worth, how much potential he really has. it's like Sing and the Niner's coaching staff have no clue what they're are doing when evaluating talent when it comes to the team...

does anyone know what i'm saying? i think we all need to send in our resume or start a petition, "If you cut Nate, you'll be disrespecting the fan base that clearly sees him as the future and the answer to all of our Niner problems, God Bless Nate Davis..."