There are 441 users in the forums
JimmyRae, my man
- 1 2
Aug 30, 2010 at 9:17 AM
- BSacamano
- Member
- Posts: 143
I'm eating a peanut butter and banana sandwich.
Aug 30, 2010 at 9:18 AM
- TonyStarks
- Veteran
- Posts: 62,988
Aug 30, 2010 at 9:23 AM
- Otter
- Veteran
- Posts: 22,936
I guess you missed all of the reports that said the play-clock was started early in the first half.
Aug 30, 2010 at 9:27 AM
- boast
- Hella Fame
- Posts: 156,350
Aug 30, 2010 at 9:36 AM
- jreff22
- Veteran
- Posts: 67,409
Originally posted by BSacamano:
I'm eating a peanut butter and banana sandwich.
Aug 30, 2010 at 9:47 AM
- Kilgore_Trout
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,150
They need to let Alex Smith run the offense. I'm sure most of us recall what Alex did with less than two minutes in Indy last year when the headset went out. He marched down the field in seven plays for one of two offensive TDs on the day (the other was a long Gore run at the beginning of the game.) And to think, that was Alex's first start of the season.
Raye can be the architect, but it is clear we need a more competent play-caller. My money is on Smith being able to handle that role, and flourish.
Raye can be the architect, but it is clear we need a more competent play-caller. My money is on Smith being able to handle that role, and flourish.
Aug 30, 2010 at 9:48 AM
- HessianDud
- Veteran
- Posts: 22,995
i think you need a hobby
Aug 30, 2010 at 9:54 AM
- pasodoc9er
- Veteran
- Posts: 21,040
Kilgore, I suggested that last yr and got laughed off the board. But i do agree with you. Even more, i firmly believe we can do nothing but get a lot better offensively if the plays are scripted 6 days before gametime. can you imagine alex coming up to the LOS and the 9ers run a no huddle O ? That would drop some jaws.
As for otter, do you really think the fact the play clock wasn't working didn't matter and if it took too long to run a play, tough tiddy, 5 yd penalty for delay of game....game clock working or not. That may come as a big surprise to you, but it happens to be the way things work.
As for otter, do you really think the fact the play clock wasn't working didn't matter and if it took too long to run a play, tough tiddy, 5 yd penalty for delay of game....game clock working or not. That may come as a big surprise to you, but it happens to be the way things work.
Aug 30, 2010 at 9:54 AM
- Sanfran_chrisco
- Veteran
- Posts: 33,918
Originally posted by Otter:
I guess you missed all of the reports that said the play-clock was started early in the first half.
is that true???
Aug 30, 2010 at 9:54 AM
- Sanfran_chrisco
- Veteran
- Posts: 33,918
Originally posted by jreff22:Originally posted by BSacamano:
I'm eating a peanut butter and banana sandwich.

Aug 31, 2010 at 12:02 PM
- pasodoc9er
- Veteran
- Posts: 21,040
In another thread there is quite a bit of sentiment against JimmyRae. Some surely is justitified(too predictable, but a good part of that is on bigmike's announcement we are gonna run the ball....which other teams read, and stopped our running game cold) hopefully no more helpful hints from bigmike. Others have their own disparaging remarks re JR, but still, he is our first OC to be here more than 1 yr since mooch left, and that is a franchise embarrassment.
Playcalling aside, the ONE thing JR could do to improve, is to get the dang plays in on time. Either he or MS don't think very fast or they can't make up their minds. It appears they are over micromanaging our O. If they would simply pull out the old GOAT Bill Walsh playbook of scripting the first 25-30 plays, they would find that the O would not have to call 2 timeouts / half, which is just an embarrassing waste of TOs, and it makes our O look disorganized, when in fact, it is either JR or MS or both who are disorganized. There is a lot to be said for a meeting of HC, OC and QB on Mon, to get a consensus on plays to be called against the upcoming D and in what order. Plays can always be changed at last minute, but jeez, having the O call 2 TOs / half really makes our coaching staff look impotent...disorganized...disjointed, and to be honest, really half azzed.
Script those suckers, have alex with the list on his forearm, and gadzooks, can you imagine the surprise on our opponents face when we run a no huddle O in the middle of the field? There is only upside here, no downside, and the fact coach walsh used it doesn't do anything but make it more desirable to use. This incredible dilly dallying around after a play is over, alex waiting for the play from the sidelines, and then having to rush the team up to LOS is for losers. We look like we have no idea what we are doing, and maybe that is exactly the case. If HC and OC would scheme ahead of time with alex, we can do nothing but improve. It also would give them some time to think about what plays to call in which situations which could be substituted at will. Also it will give alex the same chance that Brees, peyton, and Brady all have when they come up to LOS and get a chance to look over D, and change play if D set is wrong for play called. Our play calling could be improved mightily if this one simple and positive feature were changed.
Problem might be tho, that MS is such a control freak that he wouldn't even try it...which is the way a man with no serious self confidence would react. I would be truly disappointed if that were the case, because has made many other good judgements that worked out fine. We'll see if this actually comes to pass.
Playcalling aside, the ONE thing JR could do to improve, is to get the dang plays in on time. Either he or MS don't think very fast or they can't make up their minds. It appears they are over micromanaging our O. If they would simply pull out the old GOAT Bill Walsh playbook of scripting the first 25-30 plays, they would find that the O would not have to call 2 timeouts / half, which is just an embarrassing waste of TOs, and it makes our O look disorganized, when in fact, it is either JR or MS or both who are disorganized. There is a lot to be said for a meeting of HC, OC and QB on Mon, to get a consensus on plays to be called against the upcoming D and in what order. Plays can always be changed at last minute, but jeez, having the O call 2 TOs / half really makes our coaching staff look impotent...disorganized...disjointed, and to be honest, really half azzed.
Script those suckers, have alex with the list on his forearm, and gadzooks, can you imagine the surprise on our opponents face when we run a no huddle O in the middle of the field? There is only upside here, no downside, and the fact coach walsh used it doesn't do anything but make it more desirable to use. This incredible dilly dallying around after a play is over, alex waiting for the play from the sidelines, and then having to rush the team up to LOS is for losers. We look like we have no idea what we are doing, and maybe that is exactly the case. If HC and OC would scheme ahead of time with alex, we can do nothing but improve. It also would give them some time to think about what plays to call in which situations which could be substituted at will. Also it will give alex the same chance that Brees, peyton, and Brady all have when they come up to LOS and get a chance to look over D, and change play if D set is wrong for play called. Our play calling could be improved mightily if this one simple and positive feature were changed.
Problem might be tho, that MS is such a control freak that he wouldn't even try it...which is the way a man with no serious self confidence would react. I would be truly disappointed if that were the case, because has made many other good judgements that worked out fine. We'll see if this actually comes to pass.
Aug 31, 2010 at 1:01 PM
- RonMexico
- Moderator
- Posts: 80,092
typing MACHINE
Aug 31, 2010 at 1:09 PM
- sincalfaithful
- Veteran
- Posts: 27,712
maybe he takes a 20 second nap to give enough energy to call the next play
Aug 31, 2010 at 1:12 PM
- D_Niner
- Veteran
- Posts: 8,508
I thought it was spelt Jimmy Raye?









- 1 2