Fanatical Reactionaries and Critics or Why Niner Talk Sucks

Originally posted by HessianDud:

Originally posted by Kilgore_Trout:
Look at this post, made by what probably is a clueless fan (yet thinks he is a know-it-all) who probably wanted Vernon Davis cut in 2008 and Shaun Hill to be the starter last year at this time (I know those were majority postions help by many people who I couldn't help but laugh at on a daily basis). Guess what, I was violently opposed to both positions which were held by many "self-proclaimed 49er experts". Are you one of blind homers who thinks Josh Morgan is a talent that belongs on the field? I would assume so if you think it is absurd to ask whether or not Zeigler (a superior route runner with better hands) has a chance to take over the #2 spot.

In two seasons (28 games) Josh Morgan has 72 receptions for 846 yards and 6 TDs. They're not terrible numbers, but they're not great either. They break down to 2.5 receptions and 30 yards per game with a

you should start a new thread about this

Originally posted by luv49rs:
You remind me of fropwns

Originally posted by SonocoNinerFan:
Outstanding rant!!!! I find it impossible to disagree, especially with the three questions to ask oneself before starting a new thread.

Originally posted by Kilgore_Trout:
Look at this post, made by what probably is a clueless fan (yet thinks he is a know-it-all) who probably wanted Vernon Davis cut in 2008 and Shaun Hill to be the starter last year at this time (I know those were majority postions help by many people who I couldn't help but laugh at on a daily basis). Guess what, I was violently opposed to both positions which were held by many "self-proclaimed 49er experts". Are you one of blind homers who thinks Josh Morgan is a talent that belongs on the field? I would assume so if you think it is absurd to ask whether or not Zeigler (a superior route runner with better hands) has a chance to take over the #2 spot.

In two seasons (28 games) Josh Morgan has 72 receptions for 846 yards and 6 TDs. They're not terrible numbers, but they're not great either. They break down to 2.5 receptions and 30 yards per game with a less than 25% chance of catching a TD pass. In fact, he should have 2 more TDs on that tally, but he dropped one wide open TD pass from Hill and got caught on what looked to be a sure TD against the Falcons last season because he didn't finish his run to the endzone. In Week 1 of the 2008 season he also alligator armed a TD pass from O'Sullivan at Seattle, but I forgave him because it was his first game.

As for Joe Nedney, why is it ridiculous to look for another kicker? Neil Rackers was cut by the Cardinals last season. He was 16/17 from FG range, with his lone miss coming from beyond 40 yards. Meanwhile, Joe Nedney was 17/21, with one of those misses coming from just over 30 yards. Rackers isn't great at kicking the ball off either, but he is better than Nedney. I understand that it is harder to make FGs in SF than most places, but I'm sure Rackers and many other kickers are up to the task. And as I said in the OP of the Nedney thread, he has admitted to suffering from severe pain in his kicking leg. Doesn't it seem like his time is running thin?

I don't mean to be a jerk, but I can't stand all of the arrogant and ignorant 49er fans who post on these message boards. "Heitmann is god!" "Shaun Hill is the best QB we have had since Young!" "Vernon Davis sucks and is the worst pick ever!" "Alex Smith will never be anything!" "Nedney should be a 49er until he is 65!" Please... anyone who insults me better be prepared to back up their points because I don't lose many arguments.

Originally posted by baybreaker707:
There's nothing wrong with Morgan or Smith's arm.

Originally posted by Kilgore_Trout:
Look at this post, made by what probably is a clueless fan (yet thinks he is a know-it-all) who probably wanted Vernon Davis cut in 2008 and Shaun Hill to be the starter last year at this time (I know those were majority postions help by many people who I couldn't help but laugh at on a daily basis). Guess what, I was violently opposed to both positions which were held by many "self-proclaimed 49er experts". Are you one of blind homers who thinks Josh Morgan is a talent that belongs on the field? I would assume so if you think it is absurd to ask whether or not Zeigler (a superior route runner with better hands) has a chance to take over the #2 spot.

In two seasons (28 games) Josh Morgan has 72 receptions for 846 yards and 6 TDs. They're not terrible numbers, but they're not great either. They break down to 2.5 receptions and 30 yards per game with a less than 25% chance of catching a TD pass. In fact, he should have 2 more TDs on that tally, but he dropped one wide open TD pass from Hill and got caught on what looked to be a sure TD against the Falcons last season because he didn't finish his run to the endzone. In Week 1 of the 2008 season he also alligator armed a TD pass from O'Sullivan at Seattle, but I forgave him because it was his first game.

As for Joe Nedney, why is it ridiculous to look for another kicker? Neil Rackers was cut by the Cardinals last season. He was 16/17 from FG range, with his lone miss coming from beyond 40 yards. Meanwhile, Joe Nedney was 17/21, with one of those misses coming from just over 30 yards. Rackers isn't great at kicking the ball off either, but he is better than Nedney. I understand that it is harder to make FGs in SF than most places, but I'm sure Rackers and many other kickers are up to the task. And as I said in the OP of the Nedney thread, he has admitted to suffering from severe pain in his kicking leg. Doesn't it seem like his time is running thin?

I don't mean to be a jerk, but I can't stand all of the arrogant and ignorant 49er fans who post on these message boards. "Heitmann is god!" "Shaun Hill is the best QB we have had since Young!" "Vernon Davis sucks and is the worst pick ever!" "Alex Smith will never be anything!" "Nedney should be a 49er until he is 65!" Please... anyone who insults me better be prepared to back up their points because I don't lose many arguments.

Originally posted by luv49rs:

Originally posted by Kilgore_Trout:
Look at this post, made by what probably is a clueless fan (yet thinks he is a know-it-all) who probably wanted Vernon Davis cut in 2008 and Shaun Hill to be the starter last year at this time (I know those were majority postions help by many people who I couldn't help but laugh at on a daily basis). Guess what, I was violently opposed to both positions which were held by many "self-proclaimed 49er experts". Are you one of blind homers who thinks Josh Morgan is a talent that belongs on the field? I would assume so if you think it is absurd to ask whether or not Zeigler (a superior route runner with better hands) has a chance to take over the #2 spot.

In two seasons (28 games) Josh Morgan has 72 receptions for 846 yards and 6 TDs. They're not terrible numbers, but they're not great either. They break down to 2.5 receptions and 30 yards per game with a less than 25% chance of catching a TD pass. In fact, he should have 2 more TDs on that tally, but he dropped one wide open TD pass from Hill and got caught on what looked to be a sure TD against the Falcons last season because he didn't finish his run to the endzone. In Week 1 of the 2008 season he also alligator armed a TD pass from O'Sullivan at Seattle, but I forgave him because it was his first game.

As for Joe Nedney, why is it ridiculous to look for another kicker? Neil Rackers was cut by the Cardinals last season. He was 16/17 from FG range, with his lone miss coming from beyond 40 yards. Meanwhile, Joe Nedney was 17/21, with one of those misses coming from just over 30 yards. Rackers isn't great at kicking the ball off either, but he is better than Nedney. I understand that it is harder to make FGs in SF than most places, but I'm sure Rackers and many other kickers are up to the task. And as I said in the OP of the Nedney thread, he has admitted to suffering from severe pain in his kicking leg. Doesn't it seem like his time is running thin?

I don't mean to be a jerk, but I can't stand all of the arrogant and ignorant 49er fans who post on these message boards. "Heitmann is god!" "Shaun Hill is the best QB we have had since Young!" "Vernon Davis sucks and is the worst pick ever!" "Alex Smith will never be anything!" "Nedney should be a 49er until he is 65!" Please... anyone who insults me better be prepared to back up their points because I don't lose many arguments.

why did you repost some things you already said? Your point was made

Originally posted by kidash:

Originally posted by luv49rs:

Originally posted by Kilgore_Trout:
Look at this post, made by what probably is a clueless fan (yet thinks he is a know-it-all) who probably wanted Vernon Davis cut in 2008 and Shaun Hill to be the starter last year at this time (I know those were majority postions help by many people who I couldn't help but laugh at on a daily basis). Guess what, I was violently opposed to both positions which were held by many "self-proclaimed 49er experts". Are you one of blind homers who thinks Josh Morgan is a talent that belongs on the field? I would assume so if you think it is absurd to ask whether or not Zeigler (a superior route runner with better hands) has a chance to take over the #2 spot.

In two seasons (28 games) Josh Morgan has 72 receptions for 846 yards and 6 TDs. They're not terrible numbers, but they're not great either. They break down to 2.5 receptions and 30 yards per game with a less than 25% chance of catching a TD pass. In fact, he should have 2 more TDs on that tally, but he dropped one wide open TD pass from Hill and got caught on what looked to be a sure TD against the Falcons last season because he didn't finish his run to the endzone. In Week 1 of the 2008 season he also alligator armed a TD pass from O'Sullivan at Seattle, but I forgave him because it was his first game.

As for Joe Nedney, why is it ridiculous to look for another kicker? Neil Rackers was cut by the Cardinals last season. He was 16/17 from FG range, with his lone miss coming from beyond 40 yards. Meanwhile, Joe Nedney was 17/21, with one of those misses coming from just over 30 yards. Rackers isn't great at kicking the ball off either, but he is better than Nedney. I understand that it is harder to make FGs in SF than most places, but I'm sure Rackers and many other kickers are up to the task. And as I said in the OP of the Nedney thread, he has admitted to suffering from severe pain in his kicking leg. Doesn't it seem like his time is running thin?

I don't mean to be a jerk, but I can't stand all of the arrogant and ignorant 49er fans who post on these message boards. "Heitmann is god!" "Shaun Hill is the best QB we have had since Young!" "Vernon Davis sucks and is the worst pick ever!" "Alex Smith will never be anything!" "Nedney should be a 49er until he is 65!" Please... anyone who insults me better be prepared to back up their points because I don't lose many arguments.

why did you repost some things you already said? Your point was made

he got spunk, I give him that....

- 98