Originally posted by crzy:
The words of Bill Walsh echo my sentiments
Quote:
JT: A big league locker room where people are fighting for their professional life can be a pretty cutthroat place sometimes--hazing of rookies and the like.
Bill Walsh: We didn't allow it. We didn't allow any hazing whatsoever. Players should be able to focus totally on their performance and their effort to make the team. They shouldn't be distracted or maligned. And it really worked out because there were men who came in and started as rookies and were included on the team the minute they arrived. And guys like Billy Ring and Milt McCall who came to us as free agents. They were allowed to compete for a job rather than be distracted and embarrassed through hazing. There's always one cruel person if there is any form of hazing. It just takes one cruel person who mistreats others. That can really have an effect on them and, consequently, an effect on the team's performance.
Bill Walsh is right. Hazing is unnecessary childish bulls**t.
/end thread
Wrong! Coaches don't always know what goes on in the locker room... you think coaches stick around when 50 dudes drop their pants and hop in the showers? or Going out to clubs with the rookies? Or participate in "player only" meetings? Unless the coaches are directing players on the practice field they are in their own little padded offices away from the players.
I'm sorry if the frat you got kicked out of or team you probably didn't make you do the "elephant walk" (dont take it personally btw just crackin jokes) but in the end there is and always will be hazing in any type of team sport. Doesn't mean its a bad thing, there is a difference between being beaten with soap in a sock, and the vets forcing you to pick up a dinner tab or singing a song... still hazing.