There are 199 users in the forums

Football Outsiders: 2010 Organizational Rankings

Shop Find 49ers gear online
http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/insider/news/story?page=FootballOutsiders2010OrganizationalRankings

Quote:
Instead of limiting our analysis to players who have yet to emerge in the NFL, these rankings consider all players who will be 25 or younger as of September 1, 2010 -- regardless of where they were drafted or how many games they've started. After compiling a list of eligible players for each team, we compared the groups on a variety of factors. We weighed issues like upside versus established production, quantity versus quality, and current staff versus historical ability to develop rookies when it comes to evaluating the talent available to each NFL franchise.

In the end, we put together these rankings with help from the rest of the crew at Football Outsiders. The capsules represent a synopsis of thoughts as to why the team is ranked where they are and who the important young players are for the franchise. However, we should point out that talent under the age of 25 does not equal talent overall. In the NFL, a couple bounces of the ball can turn an average team into a wild-card contender -- but it takes real time to build a team that can challenge for a Super Bowl title. Some of the teams near the top of our list are still a couple of years away from that point, and their rank is more about promise for the future than promise for this upcoming campaign.


got the 49ers listed at #5 based on players 25 years or younger
Quote:
It all starts with the best middle linebacker in the game -- Patrick Willis -- and goes from there. Behind Willis is underrated safety Dashon Goldson, a playmaker who helped contribute to the fourth-ranked 49ers' run defense a year ago. Promising corner Tarell Brown also lurks in the secondary, although he's trapped as the nickelback behind the contract of Nate Clements. Meanwhile, starting wideouts Michael Crabtree (22) and Josh Morgan (25) combine with Vernon Davis (26, and thus not included as a qualifying "young" player for these rankings) to give the 49ers one of the best trios of receiving talent in the game today. The biggest hole in the organization was on the offensive line, and the 49ers invested their top two picks this year in linemen: Rutgers tackle Anthony Davis and Idaho guard Mike Iupati. With effective 25-year-old left tackle Joe Staley returning from injury, the Niners should have one of the league's better lines by 2012.

the team is getting some attention, is this a good thing?

32. Washington Redskins
31. San Diego Chargers
30. Tampa Bay Buccaneers
29. Arizona Cardinals
28. New Orleans Saints
27. Chicago Bears
26. Oakland Raiders
25. St. Louis Rams
24. Green Bay Packers
23. New York Jets
22. Buffalo Bills
21. Seatle Seahawks
20. Dallas Cowboys
19. Pittsburgh Steelers
18. New England Patriots
17. New York Giants
16. Minnesota Vikings
15. Jacksonville Jaguars
14. Indianapolis Colts
13. Philadelphia Eagles
12. Tennessee Titans
11. Miami Dolphins
10. Denver Broncos
9. Detroit Lions
8. Cleveland Browns
7. Atlanta Falcons
6. Cincinnati Bengals
5. San Francisco 49ers
4. Baltimore Ravens
3. Kansas City Chiefs
2. Carolina Panthers
1. Houston Texans
[ Edited by schmons on Jul 16, 2010 at 5:05 PM ]
The above videos are auto-populated by an affiliate.
Honestly it seems like they just randomized all the teams in the NFL in this.
Dont really get the rankings but hey were 5 so good s**t.
49ers higher than the colts, steelers, patriots, eagles????

stupid list
  • Jiks
  • Member
  • Posts: 29,220
Quote:
Some of the teams near the top of our list are still a couple of years away from that point, and their rank is more about promise for the future than promise for this upcoming campaign.
I lol'd.
Originally posted by WestCoast:
49ers higher than the colts, steelers, patriots, eagles????

stupid list

This. The writer offers some good reasons as to why the team will be successful, but #5 is crazy talk.
Well, the list an especially the title are a bit misleading, because this ranking is compiled as a ranking of teams based on talent under 25 which makes the list look a whole lot more logical.

This snippet is the interesting part:
Quote:
Instead of limiting our analysis to players who have yet to emerge in the NFL, these rankings consider all players who will be 25 or younger as of September 1, 2010 -- regardless of where they were drafted or how many games they've started.

That explains the Niners high rating on that list, as we have a lot of players even on key positions who are very young, but to be honest, I am not complaining
Originally posted by NoOffseason:
Well, the list an especially the title are a bit misleading, because this ranking is compiled as a ranking of teams based on talent under 25 which makes the list look a whole lot more logical.

This snippet is the interesting part:
Quote:
Instead of limiting our analysis to players who have yet to emerge in the NFL, these rankings consider all players who will be 25 or younger as of September 1, 2010 -- regardless of where they were drafted or how many games they've started.

That explains the Niners high rating on that list, as we have a lot of players even on key positions who are very young, but to be honest, I am not complaining

Ah. That's totally different.
Originally posted by NinerGM:
As much as I love sports, I absolutely refuse to pay ESPN for "Inside" crap which is usually speculative and rarely pans out or information you can find via google.

it's usually stuff you find in local newspapers, they just happen to put it all in one spot. and you get the insider free with a subscription to espn the magazine which i got for $4
Originally posted by NinerGM:
As much as I love sports, I absolutely refuse to pay ESPN for "Inside" crap which is usually speculative and rarely pans out or information you can find via google.

agreed.

highly speculative and way off base 90% of the time.
Originally posted by NineFourNiner:
Originally posted by WestCoast:
49ers higher than the colts, steelers, patriots, eagles????

stupid list

This. The writer offers some good reasons as to why the team will be successful, but #5 is crazy talk.

Yup
Title is misleading. The rankings are based on who has the best young talent on the roster.

Niners actually have, dare I say it, a lot of young depth on their roster. Product of so many consecutively horrible years.

But our young guys need to win now, this is Salary Cap Era so having young talent doesn't mean you win in the future. Those young guys can just go to another team in their prime.
Originally posted by Sjceruti:
Honestly it seems like they just randomized all the teams in the NFL in this.
Dont really get the rankings but hey were 5 so good s**t.

haha thats exactly what i was thinking. word for word
Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:
Title is misleading. The rankings are based on who has the best young talent on the roster.

Niners actually have, dare I say it, a lot of young depth on their roster. Product of so many consecutively horrible years.

But our young guys need to win now, this is Salary Cap Era so having young talent doesn't mean you win in the future. Those young guys can just go to another team in their prime.

This. Please edit this misleading thread title.
When I didn't see them in the bottom 7 it took me a while to find them.
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone