49ers vs. Commanders Tickets Available! →

There are 1,255 users in the forums

Joe Montana vs. Tom Brady

Shop Find 49ers gear online
Originally posted by 602_JamestownAve:
Originally posted by mryan1004:
Originally posted by tondiman:
Originally posted by WestCoast:
Originally posted by krizay:
Originally posted by Shaj:
Joe cool didn't lose a superbowl and never played like Brady is in today's playoff game. There was lack of clarity and conviction on this debate a couple of years ago. No more. When the big games come, the debate is over. Joe Montana is the better QB.


Discuss.....

I agree with you.



But Peyton > than Montana



ah good stuff, thanks for the laugh man


when people get up and stop sucking Payton's d%/$.... they will realize he was really good, but not the best.

I don't think people are sucking PEyton's d%/$. The man is in a class of his own. It's disturbing when people compare Manning and Brady. Manning runs the show, has had above average offensive line and almost always terrible defenses with a current head coach who has no business being where he's at. This year his entire team was decimated and still brought them to the playoffs with no namers. Brady on the other hand has always had an excellent offensive line, top 5 defense, and a top 3 HC of our time. Take away Adam Vinatieri's clutch kicks and the "tuck" rule what has he done. But to top this conversation off, you can't put these two in Montana's class, the man was epic, clutch, and possessed all the intangibles to be desired in a qb

Manning gets the biggest pass of all QB's when talking about his greatness than I think any other QB in history maybe other than Favre. He's great, but the way people wax poetic about this guy directing traffic at the line and all, makes me wonder why he is a less than .500 QB in the post season?

I also have heard others say that his O-line is just OK compared to Brady. So I looked it up and it shows that Manning has gotten his back dirty far less than Brady and I also looked at Big Ben for perspective, a guy who is always under pressure and getting sacked yet has a very good post season record.

In 208 starts, Manning has been sacked 231 times. (9-10 playoff rec.-1 Super Bowl)

In 145 starts, Brady has been sacked 244 times. (14-5 playoff rec.-3 Super Bowls)

In 99 starts, Roethlisberger has been sacked 274 times.(9-2 playoff rec-2 Super Bowls)

Manning has only been sacked more than 20 times in one season only 4 of his 13 years in the NFL. All other years his sack totals were in the teens with one year only being sacked 10 times. In the last 3 years, he's been sacked only 40 times. In the last 2 years, Brady has been sacked 41 times which would be much more if not for him missing all of 08-09 with the knee injury.

Peyton is great from Week 1-16 more than he is during the post season, and the post season is truly where legends and greats are born and created. For as much as Peyton is credited for being so special, that 9-10 playoff record proves he isn't as special when it matters most. And lets be real, he and the Colts weren't just sneaking into the playoffs with most of those teams. Some of those years were when the Colts had home field games and in seasons where they were one of the top teams. So therefore, he's not better than Montana and he isn't better than Brady IMO. Not to mention Manning has had some nice targets to throw to compared to Brady.

These are interesting statistics. I think part of the reason Manning is doted on is because he is a likeable guy who puts his best foot forward in representing the NFL and companies who use him to endorse products. Roethlisberger, by most accounts, is a complete ass. If he wins another Super Bowl this year, he's going to force the conversation, but I don't think a lot of people are comfortable promoting a jerk as one of the best ever. How do you polish up a guy who gets suspended for allegedly assaulting college girls?
i love how this thread and threads like it pop up everytime the patriots lose lol
Alex Smith is better than Joe, Tom and Peyton.... just sayin

Area49 will agree
  • jimrat
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 23,996
Originally posted by mr2324jgf:
Alex Smith is better than Joe, Tom and Peyton.... just sayin

Area49 will agree

Area49 MIA..........coincidence..........I think not! LOL
Originally posted by ninerbrand:
Originally posted by tondiman:
Originally posted by WestCoast:
Originally posted by krizay:
Originally posted by Shaj:
Joe cool didn't lose a superbowl and never played like Brady is in today's playoff game. There was lack of clarity and conviction on this debate a couple of years ago. No more. When the big games come, the debate is over. Joe Montana is the better QB.


Discuss.....

I agree with you.



But Peyton > than Montana



ah good stuff, thanks for the laugh man


when people get up and stop sucking Payton's d%/$.... they will realize he was really good, but not the best.

PM's career playoff record = 9-10

I like how it's always a team effort - unless we're arguing against another QB.

Peyton consistently has bad defenses and carries that team to the playoffs. It's hard to win when your defense can't stop people when it counts. This year's loss is a decent example. Peyton didn't do anything to lose that game, the defense did. In fact, he put them in position to win, just to watch his defense give the game to the Jets.

When Alex choked, it's a collective effort and everyone is to blame, according to a lot of people here. But if somebody like Peyton Manning loses, it's not collective, it's just Peyton's fault.
Originally posted by 666SF666SF:
Originally posted by crzy:
Originally posted by 666SF666SF:
GOAT QB's (My list)

1. Montana

2. Bradshaw

3. Brady

4. Manning

5. Roethlisberger

6. S.Young

7. Marino / Tarkenton

8. Unitas

9. Brees

10. Plunkett


That is a very funny face. Umm, the list IS open to discussion.

Placing Terry Bradshaw at #2 all time exposes the flaw in letting Super Bowl rings decide which QBs are the best. Bradshaw wasn't bad, but no way in hell is he even close to being a top 20 QB all time, much less 2nd greatest. Those 4 rings were won by that defense. He played his part and helped, of course, but he wasn't the main reason they won. That's like saying Trent Dilfer was the Ravens' MVP when they won the Super Bowl.
  • Jcool
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 44,537
Well of course Tom Brady is the better QB, not even close!
  • jimrat
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 23,996
Originally posted by 49erRider:
Originally posted by 666SF666SF:
Originally posted by crzy:
Originally posted by 666SF666SF:
GOAT QB's (My list)

1. Montana

2. Bradshaw

3. Brady

4. Manning

5. Roethlisberger

6. S.Young

7. Marino / Tarkenton

8. Unitas

9. Brees

10. Plunkett


That is a very funny face. Umm, the list IS open to discussion.

Placing Terry Bradshaw at #2 all time exposes the flaw in letting Super Bowl rings decide which QBs are the best. Bradshaw wasn't bad, but no way in hell is he even close to being a top 20 QB all time, much less 2nd greatest. Those 4 rings were won by that defense. He played his part and helped, of course, but he wasn't the main reason they won. That's like saying Trent Dilfer was the Ravens' MVP when they won the Super Bowl.

Plunkett? Cmon man
Originally posted by 49erRider:
Originally posted by 666SF666SF:
Originally posted by crzy:
Originally posted by 666SF666SF:
GOAT QB's (My list)

1. Montana

2. Bradshaw

3. Brady

4. Manning

5. Roethlisberger

6. S.Young

7. Marino / Tarkenton

8. Unitas

9. Brees

10. Plunkett


That is a very funny face. Umm, the list IS open to discussion.

Placing Terry Bradshaw at #2 all time exposes the flaw in letting Super Bowl rings decide which QBs are the best. Bradshaw wasn't bad, but no way in hell is he even close to being a top 20 QB all time, much less 2nd greatest. Those 4 rings were won by that defense. He played his part and helped, of course, but he wasn't the main reason they won. That's like saying Trent Dilfer was the Ravens' MVP when they won the Super Bowl.

Any list that doesnt have John Elway on the top 10 is a joke. Jim Plunkett, Fran Tarkenton, and Terry Bradshaw ahead of Elway.
Originally posted by Niners99:
Originally posted by 49erRider:
Originally posted by Niners99:
Joe Montana has 4 rings because of Joe Montana.

Sorry, but this is a huge load of horse crap. Joe had a GREAT team around him on 3 out of 4 of his championships. He didn't go out there with a bunch of bums and win it all.

how is it a load of crap? Joe Montana doesnt play in those 4 super bowls, how many rings do we have?

There's no way to know. A different QB could have had a different game plan and the outcomes could have been better or worse for us. Joe Montana didn't win 4 Super Bowls on his own. Period. Take away those defenses and key players around him and he has 0 Super Bowls.

Joe is the greatest, but to imply he's the ONLY reason we won those 4 Super Bowls is just ridiculous.
  • Blitz
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 7,858
Originally posted by BSofSF:
Originally posted by Blitz:
Originally posted by BSofSF:
OK, the criticisms of Brady are absurd. He had two touchdown passes dropped and one 4th and 18 bounce off his receiver's chest on the final drive. He drove his team down the field to pull within 7 points in about a minute. I think it's being a wee bit overstated how "average" Brady is. Montana's greatness speaks for itself. Rooting for the failure of anyone who would challenge his thrown as the best of all time is kind of classless and weak, kind of like those Jackass Miami Dolphin celebrations every year when some perfect team loses a game. Montana is the best. Brady is damn good. Brady's idol growing up was Montana. If there's one guy that I'm OK being in the discussion, it's Brady.


" Rooting for the failure of anyone who would challenge his thrown as the best of all time is kind of classless and weak"

Bulls**t. Powder puff BS...kinda like expecting a trophy for second best, or a birthday party where everybody is suppose to get something so nobody feels bad. Work's for the pop warner's and their parents and gee lets all just be nice lil' human beings, doesn't work in the big boy league.


Nobody gives a s**t abut second best, Brady's second best, and he can stay right the f**k there.


You did a nice job illustrating the point. Thanks. Joe Montana's legacy is safe. You can relax now.


Why thank you. I too thought those violins would do a nice job of illustrating your point.

A picture is indeed worth a thousand words!

Joe Montana is better than Tom Brady.

Joe Montana also does not kiss dudes.



/thread
[ Edited by mr2324jgf on Jan 17, 2011 at 2:49 PM ]
  • Blitz
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 7,858
I always knew the dude was a p***y.

Reason 114 why Montana is better than Brady:

Montana wasn't a p***y.
Joe Montana vs. Tom Brady?

Joe wins. People in the stands knew that he would find a way to win because he thrived in pressure situations.
  • Blitz
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 7,858
Originally posted by 49erRider:
Originally posted by 666SF666SF:
Originally posted by crzy:
Originally posted by 666SF666SF:
GOAT QB's (My list)

1. Montana

2. Bradshaw

3. Brady

4. Manning

5. Roethlisberger

6. S.Young

7. Marino / Tarkenton

8. Unitas

9. Brees

10. Plunkett


That is a very funny face. Umm, the list IS open to discussion.

Placing Terry Bradshaw at #2 all time exposes the flaw in letting Super Bowl rings decide which QBs are the best. Bradshaw wasn't bad, but no way in hell is he even close to being a top 20 QB all time, much less 2nd greatest. Those 4 rings were won by that defense. He played his part and helped, of course, but he wasn't the main reason they won. That's like saying Trent Dilfer was the Ravens' MVP when they won the Super Bowl.

Acccck dude. Hogwash. You are biting off way more than you can chew with that "won by the defense" statement.

Franco Harris
Lynn Swan
John Stallworth
Mike Webster
Terry Bradshaw

All of them HOF player's on that offense. Franco Harris still holds some SB records, and even had an MVP in one. Stallworth still holds some SB records.

I watched those teams firsthand, and they had some offense in most of those SB's.
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone