Originally posted by Schulzy:
racist mofo





There are 539 users in the forums
Originally posted by Schulzy:
racist mofo





Originally posted by jreff22:Originally posted by D_Niner:Originally posted by jreff22:
Nate Davis 5.00 40
Michael Vick 4.36 40
Wow!
Thanks Jeff,
I didn't know Nate was that slow. I thought I remember him making a couple of good runs in the Pre-season.
I don't have time to watch any college ball, so this kind of input really helps!
Who is this Jeff you speak of?
Originally posted by D_Niner:Originally posted by valrod33:
stupid idea, they are not similar whatsoever
Idea??? WTF. I ask the question because I don't know much about this kid. If you want to say its a stupid question, then that's fine. But, please don't infer that I'm suggesting we do use Nate this way.
Originally posted by valrod33:Originally posted by D_Niner:Originally posted by valrod33:
stupid idea, they are not similar whatsoever
Idea??? WTF. I ask the question because I don't know much about this kid. If you want to say its a stupid question, then that's fine. But, please don't infer that I'm suggesting we do use Nate this way.
whatever dude you are getting called on out on the dumb idea you had and now you are playing the "i dont know much about him" card to try and save face
Originally posted by valrod33:
stupid idea, they are not similar whatsoever
Originally posted by valrod33:Originally posted by D_Niner:Originally posted by valrod33:
stupid idea, they are not similar whatsoever
Idea??? WTF. I ask the question because I don't know much about this kid. If you want to say its a stupid question, then that's fine. But, please don't infer that I'm suggesting we do use Nate this way.
whatever dude you are getting called on out on the dumb idea you had and now you are playing the "i dont know much about him" card to try and save face

Originally posted by D_Niner:Originally posted by valrod33:Originally posted by D_Niner:Originally posted by valrod33:
stupid idea, they are not similar whatsoever
Idea??? WTF. I ask the question because I don't know much about this kid. If you want to say its a stupid question, then that's fine. But, please don't infer that I'm suggesting we do use Nate this way.
whatever dude you are getting called on out on the dumb idea you had and now you are playing the "i dont know much about him" card to try and save face
Yeah, because that's what I care about (Saving face on a message board full of people that I know nothing about)...
But let me say, your knowledge on this subject has been very enlightening... Oh, wait... By your posts, it looks like you know just as little about him as I do.
Originally posted by D_Niner:Originally posted by 9erfanAUS:
So you want two QBs on the field at once? What for, so they can pass the ball to each other?
-9fA
Kinda like why we would only want 1 reciver or 1 RB on the field at once, right?
2 QB, can cause confusion and give us an advantage if we have the right personnel and it's used right. I'm just asking if Nate could give us this type of play cause I don't know much about the kid...
Originally posted by 9erfanAUS:
So you want two QBs on the field at once? What for, so they can pass the ball to each other?
-9fA
Originally posted by D_Niner:Originally posted by taney71:
Why are there people on this board who think Nate Davis is the second coming of Vick, Joe Montana, Deon Sanders, [insert famous football player's name here]....?
Davis was a late round pick who is a project QB. He's not going to see the field this year and most likely will not next year.
Who ever said that. It's just a question.
Why are there people on this board that always jump to conclusions when somebody asks a question.
Originally posted by D_Niner:Originally posted by Schulzy:
racist mofo