There are 206 users in the forums

Los Angeles Chargers QB Trey Lance Thread

Shop 49ers game tickets
Originally posted by tankle104:
Exactly, which is why I've eased up on him and become more optimistic. Gives me hope his accuracy issues aren't as bad as they seemed etc.

it really made me look at him in a much more positive light. I'm expecting a lot of improvement from him, much more so than before I knew he was injured.

That type of injury can cause serious problems overall. So I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt, especially with his newly improved mechanics.

I would be on board with this if he was already an accurate guy then struggled after the injury. As it stands, he essentially has spent more time on the 9ers throwing more improperly than properly. According to the reports.

I'm not a believer in improving accuracy. Even less so when he's been throwing more improperly than properly. According to reports.

Now, if his mechanics are indeed cleaned up and stays that way when the whistle blows then there's hope.
The above videos are auto-populated by an affiliate.
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Smokey, you know damn well someone saying "the irony" is not even close to the worst example of misappropriation in this thread. I thought it was funny, that's it, you're the one trying to make this into a gotcha moment. I like some of Krizay's posts and others of his that I don't like, but he's come into the Trey thread to mock Trey often, I don't see you calling out those posts for hypocrisy, it's no secret why not. Personally, I don't have animosity towards Mac Jones like other posters do towards Trey. And yes, you can have an independent projection of a player, so even if it's technically not a hypocritical post, it was funny, and the point made was not a good one since being in a good program says virtually nothing about your personal adversity or lack there of.

It's also hilarious that you're trying to say there's a one way crusade from a select group of posters, when all you've done this offseason was lead a group of posters to believe any negative report about Trey, put limitations on Trey's future, repeatedly beat a dead horse that you don't believe in Trey's ability, and mock others who do the same for Brock or Sam.

Meanwhile I've been saying from the beginning that we don't know how Trey will perform given adequate playing time, I've repeatedly stated I don't thinks it's fair to assume Trey would outperform Jimmy, or that he has a higher ceiling than Purdy, I said it's perfectly reasonable to not believe in Trey and to criticize him for missing throws vs Chicago, and I've repeatedly said that I believe in Brock, so much so that it wouldn't bother me at all if Brock played every snap from here on out. I would be thrilled in fact because that means he's healthy and playing well.

Unlike you, I don't make definitive claims a young QB with 3 starts, I don't have over half of my posts in a thread of a player I don't believe in (which might be a record btw), and yet you're the one accusing others of having an agenda.

So sure, Krizay's post isn't technically hypocritical, but even mentioning a one way crusade and lumping me in there… is 100% hypocritical.

My post was a reference as to when/how Trey haad things go his way or something to that effect. That portion wasn't about adversity. I pointed out things that was clearly in Trey's favor IMO
[ Edited by krizay on May 17, 2023 at 11:51 AM ]
Originally posted by NYniner85:

good lord
Originally posted by krizay:
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Smokey, you know damn well someone saying "the irony" is not even close to the worst example of misappropriation in this thread. I thought it was funny, that's it, you're the one trying to make this into a gotcha moment. I like some of Krizay's posts and others of his that I don't like, but he's come into the Trey thread to mock Trey often, I don't see you calling out those posts for hypocrisy, it's no secret why not. Personally, I don't have animosity towards Mac Jones like other posters do towards Trey. And yes, you can have an independent projection of a player, so even if it's technically not a hypocritical post, it was funny, and the point made was not a good one since being in a good program says virtually nothing about your personal adversity or lack there of.

It's also hilarious that you're trying to say there's a one way crusade from a select group of posters, when all you've done this offseason was lead a group of posters to believe any negative report about Trey, put limitations on Trey's future, repeatedly beat a dead horse that you don't believe in Trey's ability, and mock others who do the same for Brock or Sam.

Meanwhile I've been saying from the beginning that we don't know how Trey will perform given adequate playing time, I've repeatedly stated I don't thinks it's fair to assume Trey would outperform Jimmy, or that he has a higher ceiling than Purdy, I said it's perfectly reasonable to not believe in Trey and to criticize him for missing throws vs Chicago, and I've repeatedly said that I believe in Brock, so much so that it wouldn't bother me at all if Brock played every snap from here on out. I would be thrilled in fact because that means he's healthy and playing well.

Unlike you, I don't make definitive claims a young QB with 3 starts, I don't have over half of my posts in a thread of a player I don't believe in (which might be a record btw), and yet you're the one accusing others of having an agenda.

So sure, Krizay's post isn't technically hypocritical, but even mentioning a one way crusade and lumping me in there… is 100% hypocritical.

My post was a reference as to when/how Trey haad things go his way or something to that effect. That portion wasn't about adversity. I pointed out things that was clearly in Trey's favor IMO

I guess that's a fair distinction that Smokey and I both missed. But isn't that simply the opposite of adversity? Making it essentially the same topic? I try not to misinterpret posts on purpose, so that's my bad.
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by NYniner85:

good lord

Lol… I went back to the Jimmy thread after the Washington game that was in a rain storm. Even NY said something like you can't blame Jimmy for the offensive issues today, the weather was a huge factor in the poor performance.

I guess excusarama is for Trey only, for Jimmy and Brock it's "context".
[ Edited by Waterbear on May 17, 2023 at 1:32 PM ]
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by NYniner85:

good lord

Lol… I went back to the Jimmy thread after the Washington game that was in a rain storm. Even NY said something like you can't blame Jimmy for the offensive issues today, the weather was a huge factor in the poor performance.

I guess excusarama is for Trey only, for Jimmy and Brock it's "context".
NYniner5
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by NYniner85:

good lord

Lol… I went back to the Jimmy thread after the Washington game that was in a rain storm. Even NY said something like you can't blame Jimmy for the offensive issues today, the weather was a huge factor in the poor performance.

I guess excusarama is for Trey only, for Jimmy and Brock it's "context".

Seems exactly the case. Pushing that narrative will continue incessantly I guess.

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
NYniner5

Originally posted by Waterbear:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by NYniner85:

good lord

Lol… I went back to the Jimmy thread after the Washington game that was in a rain storm. Even NY said something like you can't blame Jimmy for the offensive issues today, the weather was a huge factor in the poor performance.

I guess excusarama is for Trey only, for Jimmy and Brock it's "context".

yeah I wasn't crucifying TL due to the weather also after the CHI game
I think I said something along the lines of conditions were rough, I give him a pass

what is stupid is why are we still posting CHI weather tweets from 9 months ago.. give it a rest
Originally posted by Waterbear:
I guess that's a fair distinction that Smokey and I both missed. But isn't that simply the opposite of adversity? Making it essentially the same topic? I try not to misinterpret posts on purpose, so that's my bad.

I didn't miss that, are you kidding man?

I specifically said he was talking about the adversity Trey faced, or lack thereof, in comparison with what Purdy's experience had been throughout their football careers.

I'll get to your other post here shortly.
[ Edited by SmokeyJoe on May 17, 2023 at 1:50 PM ]
Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:
Originally posted by Waterbear:
I guess that's a fair distinction that Smokey and I both missed. But isn't that simply the opposite of adversity? Making it essentially the same topic? I try not to misinterpret posts on purpose, so that's my bad.

I didn't miss that, are you kidding man?

I specifically said he was talking about the adversity Trey faced, or lack thereof, in comparison with what Purdy's experience had been throughout their football careers.

I'll get to your other post here shortly.

LOL why are you getting mad at me?? Krizay is the one saying we misquoted him. I was just trying to be fair to him. Jesus man.
So did he not tell anyone that his finger was still f**ked? It seems like something they could've gone in and fixed up so he wasn't handicapped. It wasn't like the guy was going to play last year after the ankle injury. It doesn't make sense that they just let it slide if it was affecting his play. If the finger was what was making him so inaccurate, it is beyond stupid that it wasn't addressed last off season.
Originally posted by Waterbear:
LOL why are you getting mad at me?? Krizay is the one saying we misquoted him. I was just trying to be fair to him. Jesus man.

Guy, Krizay clarified what he said. Probably because three of you guys decided to take his comments out of context and apply to it to a completely different conversation in search of 'hypocrisy'.

I knew what he said. It was you who tried to say I missed it... not him.
Originally posted by Memphis9er:
So did he not tell anyone that his finger was still f**ked? It seems like something they could've gone in and fixed up so he wasn't handicapped. It wasn't like the guy was going to play last year after the ankle injury. It doesn't make sense that they just let it slide if it was affecting his play. If the finger was what was making him so inaccurate, it is beyond stupid that it wasn't addressed last off season.

I think the finger was fine by the start of last season. It was f**ked during the 2021 season, which resulted in him altering his throwing mechanics and grip to compensate. That then required him to spend a lot of the offseason last year correcting those mechanical changes.
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Smokey, you know damn well someone saying "the irony" is not even close to the worst example of misappropriation in this thread. I thought it was funny, that's it, you're the one trying to make this into a gotcha moment. I like some of Krizay's posts and others of his that I don't like, but he's come into the Trey thread to mock Trey often, I don't see you calling out those posts for hypocrisy, it's no secret why not. Personally, I don't have animosity towards Mac Jones like other posters do towards Trey. And yes, you can have an independent projection of a player, so even if it's technically not a hypocritical post, it was funny, and the point made was not a good one since being in a good program says virtually nothing about your personal adversity or lack there of.

It's also hilarious that you're trying to say there's a one way crusade from a select group of posters, when all you've done this offseason was lead a group of posters to believe any negative report about Trey, put limitations on Trey's future, repeatedly beat a dead horse that you don't believe in Trey's ability, and mock others who do the same for Brock or Sam.

Meanwhile I've been saying from the beginning that we don't know how Trey will perform given adequate playing time, I've repeatedly stated I don't thinks it's fair to assume Trey would outperform Jimmy, or that he has a higher ceiling than Purdy, I said it's perfectly reasonable to not believe in Trey and to criticize him for missing throws vs Chicago, and I've repeatedly said that I believe in Brock, so much so that it wouldn't bother me at all if Brock played every snap from here on out. I would be thrilled in fact because that means he's healthy and playing well.

Unlike you, I don't make definitive claims a young QB with 3 starts, I don't have over half of my posts in a thread of a player I don't believe in (which might be a record btw), and yet you're the one accusing others of having an agenda.

So sure, Krizay's post isn't technically hypocritical, but even mentioning a one way crusade and lumping me in there… is 100% hypocritical.

All of the nonsense in this post, only to finally get to what was actually at hand in the discussion (it's bolded for you).

The rest of this post is you doing exactly what I said you do. You disagree with something someone says, and rather than address it on the merits, you make straw man arguments and mischaracterize positions.

I haven't made pretty much any of the claims, especially definitively, that you're incorrectly assigning to me in this post. Probably the easiest example is that I have a definitive opinion on what Trey will or won't be as a player, or that I have put limitations on his 'ceiling' and have given up on him. Just two days ago you said this same thing to me and I responded that I don't think I've ever discussed a limitation on his ceiling, outside of saying he wasn't as talented as players like Mahomes or Allen. Yet here you are again... completely glazing over the points I've actually made.

Further I haven't mocked anybody on this board. Probably the closest I've came is returning fire a couple of idiotic posters who become insulting when they face disagreement. I respond to people's posts on the merits of those posts.

Not that it's any concern of yours but half my posts are in this thread (and many more in the other QB threads) because that's what I'm interested in talking about here. It's not only one of the most interesting situations across the entire NFL, but how the vocal part of our fanbase on social media has handled the QB situation since we made the trade up in 2021 is fascinating to me. Think of it as rubbernecking a train wreck. No better place to get into that than 49ers boards. When I want to have serious football conversations about other issues with the 49ers, or just football in general, there are other outlets.
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone