Originally posted by genus49:
Dude shut up. I don't want to knock Brock because he played great but I've been seeing your posts last few pages go on and on about how amazing he was while pretending Lance "stunk it up" and how CMC didn't make a big impact in that.
You literally saw a glimpse of Brock's worst set of reps in a rain game nowhere near what the team played with week 1.
Before Brock went in we saw the improvement on offense with CMC in there. Jimmy G went from Jittery Jimmy back to Jimmy GQ.
The idea that Lance would "stink it up" with a healthy Kittle and CMC in games outside of a monsoon during a period when the team wasn't clearly rusty from preseason is straight hate or delusion, your choice.
This thread is about Lance not Brock. Even if Brock comes back healthy before week 1, Trey is the guy who will be out there for the bulk of camp. We don't know if Brock will be back healthy, if he'll be back by week 1, if he'll stay healthy.
The best thing for this team is to get to see both guys play with the same players, in same conditions and vs the same defenders. Comparing games week 1 to when the team hits their stride is ridiculous, especially when you have two or your game changers unavailable for one guy.
You've said this a couple times now and I really don't understand it. I can't think of the rain impacting much of Brock's play in that game outside of his first pass attempt.
The team scored on 4 of 5 possessions in the first half for 16 points at halftime. Three field goals isn't the most efficient offense but 16 points is right in line with their 33 ppg scoring average with Brock as the starter. Ended up with 40 points and a blowout victory.
I would agree if you wanted to argue it actually wasn't the best we've seen him play, but he was playing well and the offense was great overall.
