Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
Originally posted by YACBros85:What is your definition of succeeding exactly? What is a successful season this year?
When Trey proves all his doubters wrong, please continue to hate. Don't eat crow. Don't pretend like you were a fan long before he succeeded. Just continue to hate.
While I do agree with your sentiment, I'm just not sure what you consider successful? Super Bowl appearance? 2 NFCC in 3 years? Good stats? 3rd leading win percentage in the NFL? What is your measurement of success?
For Trey this year. 65%+ completion, 2:1 td to int ratio or better, 8.0+ ypa, 10+ wins and a playoff appearance. What more could you reasonably expect from a 1st year starter?
Why is completion % important to you? It's nice to have the numbers to show that someone is completing more of their passes than they're not but completion % doesn't win football games.
I think you simply have to use the eye test with Trey. Putting stats as any requirement whether he had a successful season or not isn't wise IMO.
Can he show that he can lead this offense. Can he show that he can do the things that Jimmy did well while also bringing another level to this offense. I don't care if most of the TDs go to the RBs as long as we're moving the ball on offense with him at the helm.
There are games in Tom Brady's careers where the stats looked ugly but he was critical in big moments in getting his teams what they needed out of him. If Trey shows he's got command of this offense the rest will fall into place.
So you think that a QB that completes 40% of his passes is acceptable and can win you a lot of games? Tell me what QB in the NFL has had a long career completing less than 60%? If completion percentage was not important no one would waste their time recording it.
When was the last time you saw a QB complete 40% of his passes over the course of a season?
I'm talking about setting a bar like 65% when there is not a major difference between that or 60% or 70% in the grand scheme of things. Especially when you have a guy attempting more big plays vs feeding the easy routes which fluff up completions.
If you cannot complete the short throws, the deep throws are less likely to be there. I'd rather have a QB that is highly efficient completing the short throws and only take a deep shot a few times a game rather than a QB that lives and dies off the long ball. Again, if completion percentage wasn't an important stat than why do all the football sites that collect data waste their time tracking it?
Also,
Joe Montana, Tom Brady and Drew Brees all made a living off of short to medium timing route type passes. It was and still is a staple of the WCO. One of the reasons why Colin Kaepernick struggled to take his game to the next level is because he lived and died off the long ball and never became efficient at the short game. Its why a lot of promising young QB's don't make it in the NFL. To make it seem like it is easy or "fluff" is an error on your part.
