Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by BangBang49er:
Originally posted by Strwy2Hevn:
Originally posted by TTown9ers:
82% of his passing yards last night were YAC. So lol.
Perfect game plan for Jimmy
Yup as Kyle said and I'm a paraphrasing but air yards are highly inefficient compared to short efficient high percentage throws. This is why he drafts YAC people.
Fans obsession with fantasy football stats is unbelievably naive.
It's not a fantasy stat. It's a REALITY stat. It tells you exactly how much the QB contributed to the distance the pass travels. Moreover, last year the correlation between win/loss percentage and completed air yards was STRONGER (0.3226) than the correlation between win/loss and interceptions per game (0.04399 Pearson Correlation Coefficient).
So if completed air yards is "fantasy football," then what are interceptions per game, which correlated 7 times weaker than completed air yards did last year? (And if you doubt this math, recall that three of the QBs in the AFC and NFC championship were bottom ten in interception percentage, while all three were top ten in CAY/PA. Stafford was 7th in INT%, Burrows was 9th, and Jimmy was 10th.Stafford was 1st in CAY/PA, Burrows was 2nd, and Jimmy was 7th. )
(It should be noted, of course, that both had weak correlations with win/loss percentage compared to 1D% and touchdowns).
Correlation isn't causation.
At the very least, if you're going to use correlation then use a much larger sample size. The NFL is notoriously high variance.
[ Edited by All22 on Oct 4, 2022 at 10:50 PM ]

