Marcus Peters Thread | Page 2 | 49ers Webzone Forum

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:
Darby > Peters > Armstead

Armstead + Bell + Chargers high 5th (darn near 4th) > Darby > Peters

lol, you put Armstead + Bell + a 5th round pick above players that are proving themselves??

Homerism is strong in you.

Dec 7, 2015 at 10:44 AM

#22

susweel
Hall of Nepal
Posts: 120,278

Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:
Darby > Peters > Armstead

Armstead + Bell + Chargers high 5th (darn near 4th) > Darby > Peters

lol, you put Armstead + Bell + a 5th round pick above players that are proving themselves??

Homerism is strong in you.

Lol armstead cant even beat TJE to start a game he just an awful pick right now. Bell lol a back up TE yay those are so hard to find.

[ Edited by susweel on Dec 7, 2015 at 10:45 AM ]

Dec 7, 2015 at 11:02 AM

#23

9er4lyphe
Veteran
Posts: 1,647

Originally posted by StOnEy333:
What's up with him barfing his brains out on the sideline yesterday? lol

Another sewage leak at the coliseum.

Dec 7, 2015 at 12:46 PM

#24

NCommand
Hall of Fame
Posts: 123,365

Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:
Darby > Peters > Armstead

Armstead + Bell + Chargers high 5th (darn near 4th) > Darby > Peters

lol, you put Armstead + Bell + a 5th round pick above players that are proving themselves??

Homerism is strong in you.

I'll take 2 starting caliber players (growing into starter roles) plus a high 5th vs a CB who's all risk (7 TD's given up plus a boatload of other failures esp. on 3rd downs behind the best pass rush in the game) and reward (5 INT's) any day of the week. No brainer for a GM.

Dec 7, 2015 at 1:01 PM

#25

susweel
Hall of Nepal
Posts: 120,278

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:
Darby > Peters > Armstead

Armstead + Bell + Chargers high 5th (darn near 4th) > Darby > Peters

lol, you put Armstead + Bell + a 5th round pick above players that are proving themselves??

Homerism is strong in you.

I'll take 2 starting caliber players (growing into starter roles) plus a high 5th vs a CB who's all risk (7 TD's given up plus a boatload of other failures esp. on 3rd downs behind the best pass rush in the game) and reward (5 INT's) any day of the week. No brainer for a GM.

5 ints and 18 passes broken up vs a guy with 8 tackles on the season with 1 garbage time sack lol and a 3rd string TE. Yah I'd say that be a no brainer for a GM of a 4-8 team. lol

Dec 7, 2015 at 1:25 PM

#26

Hitman49
Veteran
Posts: 2,040

Originally posted by susweel:

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:
Darby > Peters > Armstead

Armstead + Bell + Chargers high 5th (darn near 4th) > Darby > Peters

lol, you put Armstead + Bell + a 5th round pick above players that are proving themselves??

Homerism is strong in you.

I'll take 2 starting caliber players (growing into starter roles) plus a high 5th vs a CB who's all risk (7 TD's given up plus a boatload of other failures esp. on 3rd downs behind the best pass rush in the game) and reward (5 INT's) any day of the week. No brainer for a GM.

5 ints and 18 passes broken up vs a guy with 8 tackles on the season with 1 garbage time sack lol and a 3rd string TE. Yah I'd say that be a no brainer for a GM of a 4-8 team. lol

why is Bell in the conversation?? wasn't Peters taken the very next pick after AA...

Dec 7, 2015 at 1:44 PM

#27

susweel
Hall of Nepal
Posts: 120,278

Originally posted by Hitman49:
Originally posted by susweel:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:
Darby > Peters > Armstead

Armstead + Bell + Chargers high 5th (darn near 4th) > Darby > Peters

lol, you put Armstead + Bell + a 5th round pick above players that are proving themselves??

Homerism is strong in you.

I'll take 2 starting caliber players (growing into starter roles) plus a high 5th vs a CB who's all risk (7 TD's given up plus a boatload of other failures esp. on 3rd downs behind the best pass rush in the game) and reward (5 INT's) any day of the week. No brainer for a GM.

5 ints and 18 passes broken up vs a guy with 8 tackles on the season with 1 garbage time sack lol and a 3rd string TE. Yah I'd say that be a no brainer for a GM of a 4-8 team. lol

why is Bell in the conversation?? wasn't Peters taken the very next pick after AA...

It's just ncommand trying to build up baalke's picks as usual. We could have had bell if we wantrd and drafted peters. BTW Bell is nothing special

Dec 7, 2015 at 1:49 PM

#28

NYniner85
Veteran
Posts: 107,658

BEST CB OF ALLLLLLLLLL TIME!!!!!!!

Dec 7, 2015 at 1:52 PM

#29

NYniner85
Veteran
Posts: 107,658

Originally posted by Hitman49:

Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:
Darby > Peters > Armstead

so much for taking best player available...AA is a project and those are not ment to be first round picks...

Darby was a 2nd round pick so no sense in bringing him up with AA. Also look at that pass rush and DL they have in Buffalo! s**t he'd better be good lol.

A good 3-4 DE 5-tech is hard to find and AA has a chance to be one.

Dec 7, 2015 at 1:53 PM

#30

NYniner85
Veteran
Posts: 107,658

But wait this is the Peter's thread we so let's keep it about Peter's people