Originally posted by ChazBoner:
u don't get suspended from the NFL for a DUI.
this..
There are 184 users in the forums
Originally posted by ChazBoner:
u don't get suspended from the NFL for a DUI.
Originally posted by ninerjok:Lynch is not a slick b*****d as someone mentioned on here previously. His lawyers are. Just continually amazed at how lucky the Seacawks are at everything.
Originally posted by zaghawk:A win is a win. Playoff seeding isn't determined by whether or not we beat the Seahawks with Lynch active.
You really want a potential win against the Hawks in a game where we would be missing our star RB and would constantly point to it as an excuse for a loss. There's no joy in wins (if it's a close game) when a star player is missing on the other end. Blowout wins, can be debated that even if that guy was in, it wouldn't have mattered. i.e. If the Seahawks barely beat the Broncos in the SB this year, people would have been crying about Von Miller missing. If the Hawks barely beat San Fran in week 2, people could have pointed to Crabtree as the only reason for the loss. Just saying.
Originally posted by speedster:
If he didn't get convicted of a DUI how can the NFL suspend him?
He is just getting lucky somehow, he'll get his. It's a matter of time, play with fire enough, you're eventually going to get burned.
Originally posted by Stevec9932:
Originally posted by ChazBoner:
u don't get suspended from the NFL for a DUI.
this..
Originally posted by a49erfan77:
Originally posted by zaghawk:A win is a win. Playoff seeding isn't determined by whether or not we beat the Seahawks with Lynch active.
You really want a potential win against the Hawks in a game where we would be missing our star RB and would constantly point to it as an excuse for a loss. There's no joy in wins (if it's a close game) when a star player is missing on the other end. Blowout wins, can be debated that even if that guy was in, it wouldn't have mattered. i.e. If the Seahawks barely beat the Broncos in the SB this year, people would have been crying about Von Miller missing. If the Hawks barely beat San Fran in week 2, people could have pointed to Crabtree as the only reason for the loss. Just saying.
Originally posted by zaghawk:
Originally posted by Rathmanator:
LMAO, for what? reckless driving? REALLY? I highly doubt it, but if it is true, please make it the week the Hags are in Santa Clara.
You really want a potential win against the Hawks in a game where we would be missing our star RB and would constantly point to it as an excuse for a loss. There's no joy in wins (if it's a close game) when a star player is missing on the other end. Blowout wins, can be debated that even if that guy was in, it wouldn't have mattered. i.e. If the Seahawks barely beat the Broncos in the SB this year, people would have been crying about Von Miller missing. If the Hawks barely beat San Fran in week 2, people could have pointed to Crabtree as the only reason for the loss. Just saying.
Originally posted by zaghawk:
Originally posted by a49erfan77:
Originally posted by zaghawk:A win is a win. Playoff seeding isn't determined by whether or not we beat the Seahawks with Lynch active.
You really want a potential win against the Hawks in a game where we would be missing our star RB and would constantly point to it as an excuse for a loss. There's no joy in wins (if it's a close game) when a star player is missing on the other end. Blowout wins, can be debated that even if that guy was in, it wouldn't have mattered. i.e. If the Seahawks barely beat the Broncos in the SB this year, people would have been crying about Von Miller missing. If the Hawks barely beat San Fran in week 2, people could have pointed to Crabtree as the only reason for the loss. Just saying.
That's pathetic, and you should be ashamed of yourself as a Niner fan. Hell I have more faith in your team than you do that the Niners are fully capable of beating the Hawks even with Lynch, but to hope hes gone due to suspension for a win...That's almost as bad as hoping someone key will be injured. Piss poor (insert Richard Sherman/ Brandon Browner/PEDHawk joke here). I'm sure others here would actually agree with me.
Originally posted by 9er2k:
Originally posted by zaghawk:
Originally posted by a49erfan77:
Originally posted by zaghawk:A win is a win. Playoff seeding isn't determined by whether or not we beat the Seahawks with Lynch active.
You really want a potential win against the Hawks in a game where we would be missing our star RB and would constantly point to it as an excuse for a loss. There's no joy in wins (if it's a close game) when a star player is missing on the other end. Blowout wins, can be debated that even if that guy was in, it wouldn't have mattered. i.e. If the Seahawks barely beat the Broncos in the SB this year, people would have been crying about Von Miller missing. If the Hawks barely beat San Fran in week 2, people could have pointed to Crabtree as the only reason for the loss. Just saying.
That's pathetic, and you should be ashamed of yourself as a Niner fan. Hell I have more faith in your team than you do that the Niners are fully capable of beating the Hawks even with Lynch, but to hope hes gone due to suspension for a win...That's almost as bad as hoping someone key will be injured. Piss poor (insert Richard Sherman/ Brandon Browner/PEDHawk joke here). I'm sure others here would actually agree with me.
Seahawks had no problem with bragging about smoking us at home last year without Justin Smith
Originally posted by lucky_49:
Originally posted by zaghawk:
Originally posted by Rathmanator:
LMAO, for what? reckless driving? REALLY? I highly doubt it, but if it is true, please make it the week the Hags are in Santa Clara.
You really want a potential win against the Hawks in a game where we would be missing our star RB and would constantly point to it as an excuse for a loss. There's no joy in wins (if it's a close game) when a star player is missing on the other end. Blowout wins, can be debated that even if that guy was in, it wouldn't have mattered. i.e. If the Seahawks barely beat the Broncos in the SB this year, people would have been crying about Von Miller missing. If the Hawks barely beat San Fran in week 2, people could have pointed to Crabtree as the only reason for the loss. Just saying.
i actually agree with you here. i HATE playing teams when they have good players injured because theres always that nagging feeling that you only won because they were out. though, bowman is likely to be out for decent chunk of the season too, so maybe that cancels it out
Originally posted by zaghawk:I'm not hoping Lynch will be out so that we can win. I know that we can win regardless of if he plays or not. I just don't like that he has seemingly avoided taking any accountability for driving drunk again.
That's pathetic, and you should be ashamed of yourself as a Niner fan. Hell I have more faith in your team than you do that the Niners are fully capable of beating the Hawks even with Lynch, but to hope hes gone due to suspension for a win...That's almost as bad as hoping someone key will be injured. Piss poor (insert Richard Sherman/ Brandon Browner/PEDHawk joke here). I'm sure others here would actually agree with me.
Originally posted by a49erfan77:
Originally posted by zaghawk:I'm not hoping Lynch will be out so that we can win. I know that we can win regardless of if he plays or not. I just don't like that he has seemingly avoided taking any accountability for driving drunk again.
That's pathetic, and you should be ashamed of yourself as a Niner fan. Hell I have more faith in your team than you do that the Niners are fully capable of beating the Hawks even with Lynch, but to hope hes gone due to suspension for a win...That's almost as bad as hoping someone key will be injured. Piss poor (insert Richard Sherman/ Brandon Browner/PEDHawk joke here). I'm sure others here would actually agree with me.
Originally posted by 9er2k:
Seahawks had no problem with bragging about smoking us at home last year without Justin Smith