Denzel Boston-WR-Washington

Big bodied receiver with some small receiver traits. Plays like a traditional bigger receiver, great red zone weapon, strong hands, uses his body well to block out defenders like a center in basketball, great at high pointing the football but also a steadily improving route runner who excels against both man and zone coverage. Great awareness at finding empty spots in the zone and will quickly move towards the QB when they are scrambling. Like Jennings he's great at snatching passes up high and beating out DB's for the football. Not a speed demon, probably a 4.55-4.6 40 guy but he's a long strider with the ability to run right past CB's if they hesitate.

I think he'd be a nice complement to a guy like Pearsall and a great weapon for Purdy, particularly in the red zone. He's also a very willing and determined blocker so that definitely helps him in this offense.

I see him as a very high end #2 WR in the NFL, a guy who will be a major threat on 3rd downs and around the goal line because of his ability to block out and beat out DBs to the football. More aggressive than a Keon Coleman and a better separator than someone like N'Keal Harry.

He'd be a fine replacement to Jennings should he depart in FA.

udub alum, IDK why exactly but I feel like he'll be a better pro than Rome Odunze.

I want the tackle in rnd one but figuring we'd go WR again with that becoming a need again. I always want the big strong WR's for easy throws.
Shanny likes he smaller shifty ones that can get open but get beat up too. Brown is who I have liked if we go WR.

Originally posted by jobiwon:
I want the tackle in rnd one but figuring we'd go WR again with that becoming a need again. I always want the big strong WR's for easy throws.
Shanny likes he smaller shifty ones that can get open but get beat up too. Brown is who I have liked if we go WR.

why do people want OT our OL is looking good this is a very weak OT class i dont get the idea of drafting a guy in round 1 who may end up sitting for at least 1 year maybe longer

Originally posted by ritz126:

Originally posted by jobiwon:
I want the tackle in rnd one but figuring we'd go WR again with that becoming a need again. I always want the big strong WR's for easy throws.
Shanny likes he smaller shifty ones that can get open but get beat up too. Brown is who I have liked if we go WR.

why do people want OT our OL is looking good this is a very weak OT class i dont get the idea of drafting a guy in round 1 who may end up sitting for at least 1 year maybe longer

Well you should draft BPA at a premier position and OT is a premier position. We know Trent isnt going to play forever so if there is a 1st rd graded left tackle sitting there with a first round grade then yes take him. Or you can wait and reach next year when Trent does retire.

Plus with our injury luck who knows when we will actually need him.

Originally posted by miked1978:

Originally posted by ritz126:

Originally posted by jobiwon:
I want the tackle in rnd one but figuring we'd go WR again with that becoming a need again. I always want the big strong WR's for easy throws.
Shanny likes he smaller shifty ones that can get open but get beat up too. Brown is who I have liked if we go WR.

why do people want OT our OL is looking good this is a very weak OT class i dont get the idea of drafting a guy in round 1 who may end up sitting for at least 1 year maybe longer

Well you should draft BPA at a premier position and OT is a premier position. We know Trent isnt going to play forever so if there is a 1st rd graded left tackle sitting there with a first round grade then yes take him. Or you can wait and reach next year when Trent does retire.

Plus with our injury luck who knows when we will actually need him.

Kyle is going to drive the T.Williams train until it derails and we are probably not going to plan ahead but wait until he does retire before we make a move to replace him IMO

Originally posted by miked1978:

Originally posted by ritz126:

Originally posted by jobiwon:
I want the tackle in rnd one but figuring we'd go WR again with that becoming a need again. I always want the big strong WR's for easy throws.
Shanny likes he smaller shifty ones that can get open but get beat up too. Brown is who I have liked if we go WR.

why do people want OT our OL is looking good this is a very weak OT class i dont get the idea of drafting a guy in round 1 who may end up sitting for at least 1 year maybe longer

Well you should draft BPA at a premier position and OT is a premier position. We know Trent isnt going to play forever so if there is a 1st rd graded left tackle sitting there with a first round grade then yes take him. Or you can wait and reach next year when Trent does retire.

Plus with our injury luck who knows when we will actually need him.

Fair enough,but what if theres a much more highly rated prospect available at WR,Edge,LB,S or C do you still take the T?