Bufallo's 1st (13th) & Sammy Watkins | Page 2

9moon · 2016-11-16T10:18:01-08:00

for the 49ers 2nd overall pick. Would you guys pull the trigger if Buffalo suddenly offers the un-happy Watkins and it's 1st pick which is currently 13th?? or would you rather take Tennessee's offer of their two 1st rounder this year which is the 9th and the 17th??

Nov 16, 2016 at 12:23 PM

#16

NYniner85
Veteran
Posts: 119,098

Originally posted by jersey49er:
I think teams feel good having the franchise tag, where they would have more time to try to extend..im jealous of both of the trade you mentioned tho lol in case you wanted to kno..

Yeah having the tag is nice but the kid can't stay healthy...I'd pass on the trade.

Nov 16, 2016 at 12:25 PM

#17

ayleswbj11
Veteran
Posts: 2,090

This is crazy, never gonna happen. We have a crap ton of money. If they don't franchise Terell Pryor snag him and draft a dam QB!!

Nov 16, 2016 at 12:58 PM

#18

jersey49er
Veteran
Posts: 7,669

Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by jersey49er:
I think teams feel good having the franchise tag, where they would have more time to try to extend..im jealous of both of the trade you mentioned tho lol in case you wanted to kno..

Yeah having the tag is nice but the kid can't stay healthy...I'd pass on the trade.

Yeah it's unfortunate bc he's a great WR..a healthy Watkins is maybe top 7

Nov 16, 2016 at 1:26 PM

#19

LifelongNiner
Veteran
Posts: 24,721

Too rich and too injury prone. Now if it we were to swap 2nd round picks (a more fair deal) and maybe our 5th, I am on board.

Nov 16, 2016 at 3:45 PM

#20

LVJay
Veteran
Posts: 27,847

He is good. He is proven. He is [often] hurt...

#NoThanksPass #

Nov 16, 2016 at 3:57 PM

#21

aclarke49
Veteran
Posts: 283

I don't mind the trade with Tenn. we can still trade back again and get even more picks. We need to build up the talent on our roster.

That being said, not sure I mind the Buffalo trade either. I hear a lot of the comments about injury history. Just something to keep in mind is when you're unhappy you're less likely to get out there while dinged up. Hard to motivate you're self. Then again, who's to say he would be happy in SF?

Nov 16, 2016 at 7:07 PM

#22

LVJay
Veteran
Posts: 27,847

Originally posted by aclarke49:
Just something to keep in mind is when you're unhappy you're less likely to get out there while dinged up. Hard to motivate you're self. Then again, who's to say he would be happy in SF?

If he's unhappy now, he might consider suicide here...

Buffalo Buffoons >>> Alviso 49ers

#

Nov 16, 2016 at 7:58 PM

#23

Zachary13White
Veteran
Posts: 521

Originally posted by CorvaNinerFan:
If we're drafting in the top 3, there will be plenty of suitors willing to trade up and give up a host of picks. There'll also be some decent WR's in the FA market...Floyd, Jeffery, LaFell, Britt, Stills just to name a few. I think it's smarter to get as many picks as you can by trading down...and with the potential for $100M in cap space, re-sign some of our own players and bring in some proven talent to augment the youngsters. So, I'd say no to your proposed deal.

not always... remember the yr we took Alex Smith. . nobody wanted the pick we took smith and Rodgers went 20something picks later. .

Nov 16, 2016 at 10:14 PM

#24

NinerSickness
Member
Posts: 8,897

Corey Davis.

Nov 16, 2016 at 10:23 PM

#25

shmuck
Veteran
Posts: 885

Originally posted by NinerSickness:
Corey Davis.

THISSSSS

Nov 16, 2016 at 11:13 PM

#26

JEXIT
Veteran
Posts: 229

Who?

Nov 17, 2016 at 2:25 AM

#27

LifelongNiner
Veteran
Posts: 24,721

Originally posted by Zachary13White:

Originally posted by CorvaNinerFan:
If we're drafting in the top 3, there will be plenty of suitors willing to trade up and give up a host of picks. There'll also be some decent WR's in the FA market...Floyd, Jeffery, LaFell, Britt, Stills just to name a few. I think it's smarter to get as many picks as you can by trading down...and with the potential for $100M in cap space, re-sign some of our own players and bring in some proven talent to augment the youngsters. So, I'd say no to your proposed deal.
not always... remember the yr we took Alex Smith. . nobody wanted the pick we took smith and Rodgers went 20something picks later. .

Different times because there was no rookie cap then. It would've been a trade up AND a massive salary to take on. The only way I even think about a trade down is if the gap in QBs isn't that wide and Myles Garrett is gone.

Nov 17, 2016 at 2:35 AM

#28

MadDog49er
Hall of Fame
Posts: 19,400

No. The team needs a franchise QB, and this pick puts us is a perfect position to draft one, or trade a few slots down to get a bunch of future picks. This is a start over for the franchise

Nov 17, 2016 at 5:06 AM

#29

Rgonelove
Veteran
Posts: 383

No thank you to both
Niether deal is worth our pick

Nov 17, 2016 at 5:16 AM

#30

miked1978
Veteran
Posts: 12,598

If we didn't have so many other needs with QB being at the top of the list then I would say yeah.