QB or Garrett

Originally posted by NTeply49:

Garret in the firSt Trubisky in the 2nd would be nice

Yeah and Fournette in the 3rd. Reach for Peppers in the 4th. Butt in the 5th. Vea in the 6th. King in the 7th. And make sure to grab Davis, Williams and Ross as UDFAs.

Originally posted by Jasta:
Doesn't look like there's any Andrew Lucks in this draft but possibly a few Dak Prescotts. Garrett first, QB second/third.

Baalke will draft six DB's and a couple of wheelchair rugby players with 'bargain potential'.

Wasn't any Andrew Lucks in last yr's draft and QB went 1 and 2

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Originally posted by NTeply49:
Garret in the firSt Trubisky in the 2nd would be nice

Yeah and Fournette in the 3rd. Reach for Peppers in the 4th. Butt in the 5th. Vea in the 6th. King in the 7th. And make sure to grab Davis, Williams and Ross as UDFAs.

dayum bro. lol

Originally posted by Rascal:

Originally posted by AlmighT49er:
what if the Browns like Kessler just enough to go Garret at 1? I mean if they pick no1 and we pick no2? do we go QB then? or Allen?

Impossible. You mean they may like Kessler so much, as in the guy who is yet to win a game for them whereby they will bypass another QB pick again? We are talking about the same Kessler right? LOL. Bro, Sashi Brown is lucky that he hasn't been fired yet after handing Carson Wentz over to the Eagles on a silver platter. He would be signing his own firing order if he were to miss on a QB again.

Well they do have 5 top 100 picks...2 in the 1st, 2 in the 2nd, and a 3rd. They could make a move to get the BPA a 1 and move up for a QB with their other picks if need be.

Originally posted by NYniner85:
Well they do have 5 top 100 picks...2 in the 1st, 2 in the 2nd, and a 3rd. They could make a move to get the BPA a 1 and move up for a QB with their other picks if need be.

Well, I guess that will depend on how high or low their second 1st round pick is. If they are serious about drafting a top franchise QB, I can't see them drafting that QB outside the top 10 pick. It is very possible that 3 QBs will be gone within the top 10th pick going to the 9ers, Bears, may be the Jets or even the Cards as some have suggested.

Originally posted by Rascal:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Well they do have 5 top 100 picks...2 in the 1st, 2 in the 2nd, and a 3rd. They could make a move to get the BPA a 1 and move up for a QB with their other picks if need be.

Well, I guess that will depend on how high or low their second 1st round pick is. If they are serious about drafting a top franchise QB, I can't see them drafting that QB outside the top 10 pick. It is very possible that 3 QBs will be gone within the top 10th pick going to the 9ers, Bears, may be the Jets or even the Cards as some have suggested.

The leading guys Mitch, Kizer and Watson. The only one I like is Mitch but not in the top 5. I really like Falk in the second but we would have to get a serviceable veteran QB for a season or 2 while we bring Falk along.

Originally posted by Rascal:

Well, I guess that will depend on how high or low their second 1st round pick is. If they are serious about drafting a top franchise QB, I can't see them drafting that QB outside the top 10 pick. It is very possible that 3 QBs will be gone within the top 10th pick going to the 9ers, Bears, may be the Jets or even the Cards as some have suggested.

Yeah I've never wanted the browns to win so much in my life lol.

I could see Hue being in love with the upside of kizer he's his kind of qb IMO.

I'd love Mitch or Watson and wouldn't be upset with Garrett (best player in he draft at a very important position) if they make sure to either trade for Jimmy G or get falk/manhomes in rd 2.

I'm with ya this yr, we need qb above all...

Originally posted by Hysterikal:
The leading guys Mitch, Kizer and Watson. The only one I like is Mitch but not in the top 5. I really like Falk in the second but we would have to get a serviceable veteran QB for a season or 2 while we bring Falk along.

First of all, forget about Kizer, the kid is way overrated. Bottom line, this is not the time to defer on a supposedly franchise QB until the 2nd round. There are only 2 top QB prospects in my opinion, that being Watson and Trubisky not in any particular order. I find myself gradually sliding towards Tribusky. The only other guy I will consider is trading for Jimmy Garoppolo.

Originally posted by NYniner85:
Yeah I've never wanted the browns to win so much in my life lol.

I could see Hue being in love with the upside of kizer he's his kind of qb IMO.

I'd love Mitch or Watson and wouldn't be upset with Garrett (best player in he draft at a very important position) if they make sure to either trade for Jimmy G or get falk/manhomes in rd 2.

I'm with ya this yr, we need qb above all...

If they can somehow secure Jimmy G then I am OK to go for Garrett. But, other than that, for me is either Watson or Trubisky. I might be shifting towards Tribusky more as we speak.

Bottom line, there is just no way we can just go on with another season of either Kap or Gabbert.

Originally posted by Rascal:

If they can somehow secure Jimmy G then I am OK to go for Garrett. But, other than that, for me is either Watson or Trubisky. I might be shifting towards Tribusky more as we speak.

Bottom line, there is just no way we can just go on with another season of either Kap or Gabbert.

Oh I think it's pretty obvious that kap and gabbert will not be here next yr regardless on who we draft...I don't want some other team's trash either lol.

I think Jimmy G would be a great fit for here dude smart, accurate as hell, quick release, other than the shoulder injury had been durable, isnt a statue in the pocket, and a hard worker

He'd be the top qb in this draft IMHO, I'd even burn a conditional 3rd (which could move up to a 2nd based on play).

Garrett and Jimmy G with the first two picks along with overpaying for some vets and we'd be move into the other direction(new DC) I think that would give the fans some optimism ...we know chip likes to shake it up, but can't see baalke doing that though unfortunately.

If Chip is staying, Jimmy G isn't going to help. Chip's system isn't the problem, Baalke not building the roster to the system is.

Originally posted by TheNef77:
If Chip is staying, Jimmy G isn't going to help. Chip's system isn't the problem, Baalke not building the roster to the system is.

I believe that Chips system isn't the problem but disagree that Jimmy G wont help, in his limited time playing he has shown he is very accurate, great arm, went through his progressions well and is mobile..he would flourish in Chips scheme..Chips scheme isn't difficult to play great in if you can read defenses and are accurate..

Originally posted by Rascal:

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

The leading guys Mitch, Kizer and Watson. The only one I like is Mitch but not in the top 5. I really like Falk in the second but we would have to get a serviceable veteran QB for a season or 2 while we bring Falk along.

First of all, forget about Kizer, the kid is way overrated. Bottom line, this is not the time to defer on a supposedly franchise QB until the 2nd round. There are only 2 top QB prospects in my opinion, that being Watson and Trubisky not in any particular order. I find myself gradually sliding towards Tribusky. The only other guy I will consider is trading for Jimmy Garoppolo.

Oh I've been on the Jimmy G hype train from the get go bro. Trust me the dream is Garret in the 1st and figure out a way to get Jimmy G

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Rascal:
Well, I guess that will depend on how high or low their second 1st round pick is. If they are serious about drafting a top franchise QB, I can't see them drafting that QB outside the top 10 pick. It is very possible that 3 QBs will be gone within the top 10th pick going to the 9ers, Bears, may be the Jets or even the Cards as some have suggested.

Yeah I've never wanted the browns to win so much in my life lol.

I could see Hue being in love with the upside of kizer he's his kind of qb IMO.

I'd love Mitch or Watson and wouldn't be upset with Garrett (best player in he draft at a very important position) if they make sure to either trade for Jimmy G or get falk/manhomes in rd 2.

I'm with ya this yr, we need qb above all...

so basically if the niners pick in the top 3 they walk away with either Watson, Trubisky or Garrett..to me that's a win, and like you said if its Garrett then witht eh 2nd they have to get a QB whether its Jimmy G, Mahomes, Falk or another that rises..both Scenarios be a huge upgrade and headed in the right direction finally..

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Originally posted by Rascal:

Originally posted by Hysterikal:
The leading guys Mitch, Kizer and Watson. The only one I like is Mitch but not in the top 5. I really like Falk in the second but we would have to get a serviceable veteran QB for a season or 2 while we bring Falk along.

First of all, forget about Kizer, the kid is way overrated. Bottom line, this is not the time to defer on a supposedly franchise QB until the 2nd round. There are only 2 top QB prospects in my opinion, that being Watson and Trubisky not in any particular order. I find myself gradually sliding towards Tribusky. The only other guy I will consider is trading for Jimmy Garoppolo.

Oh I've been on the Jimmy G hype train from the get go bro. Trust me the dream is Garret in the 1st and figure out a way to get Jimmy G

And that dream is a big possibility..Id love for that to happen..