Originally posted by GorefullBore:
Originally posted by ChipKelly:
in baakle we trust!!!
said no one ever......
Actually that was said quite often..............3-5 years ago.![]()
With the team that Scott McCloughlin built lol
There are 268 users in the forums
Originally posted by GorefullBore:
Originally posted by ChipKelly:
in baakle we trust!!!
said no one ever......
Actually that was said quite often..............3-5 years ago.![]()
Originally posted by ChipKelly:With the team that Scott McCloughlin built lol
Originally posted by FL9er:Check this out Phoenix, if you have the time:
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000649763/article/drafting-qb-might-not-be-smart-move-for-browns
Originally posted by InsertNameHere:
Goff is available at 7, but we decide to draft the tackle from ND, and C.Cook in the 2nd?
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Originally posted by dsmith_49erz:
If Miles or Tunsil are there at 7 then it makes sense but, picking Goff at 7 would tear my nerves up. We need the best available O line and pass rushers with our first 4 picks. Goff will not offset our inability to run / run block or pass block...nor will he help put pressure on the opposing QB's. I say no to any QB within the first 4picks, ideally I see the 2 top linemen and 2 top pass rushers as our first 4 picks, all are immediate needs.
The best OL in the world means jack if you dont have the right QB behind it.
Historically its far far easier to find effective OL in the later rounds and in FA than it is to find a quarterback.
Go look at what the Cowboys stacked OL did for them after Tony Romo went down last year. From playoff team to picking in the Top 5.
If you have what you consider a franchise QB available, you dont pass on them for anything else. This notion of "first you gotta build up the team and then worry about a QB" sounds great in theory, rarely works out in practice. The worst teams are always going to be the best positioned to take a top QB prospect.
I'd rather that this team be terrible for a couple years than turning into the Rams and being 7-9 or 8-8 forever.
Originally posted by LasVegasWally:
Good call!
The bold statement says it all.
If Trent/Chip really don't believe either guy is a "franchise QB" then we should pick elsewhere.
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:Originally posted by ChipKelly:With the team that Scott McCloughlin built lol
Yeah guys like Rachal and Balmer were certainly key pieces. For all the knob slobbing that McCloughan gets, the dude bombed the only two drafts that he actually ran for the 49ers.
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
The best OL in the world means jack if you dont have the right QB behind it.
Historically its far far easier to find effective OL in the later rounds and in FA than it is to find a quarterback.
Go look at what the Cowboys stacked OL did for them after Tony Romo went down last year. From playoff team to picking in the Top 5.
If you have what you consider a franchise QB available, you dont pass on them for anything else. This notion of "first you gotta build up the team and then worry about a QB" sounds great in theory, rarely works out in practice. The worst teams are always going to be the best positioned to take a top QB prospect.
I'd rather that this team be terrible for a couple years than turning into the Rams and being 7-9 or 8-8 forever.
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:Originally posted by InsertNameHere:Goff is available at 7, but we decide to draft the tackle from ND, and C.Cook in the 2nd?
Connor Cook at any point in the draft would have me irate.
Originally posted by InsertNameHere:
Goff is available at 7, but we decide to draft the tackle from ND, and C.Cook in the 2nd?
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Connor Cook at any point in the draft would have me irate.
Originally posted by hashtagnumber80:I just wonder how many different variations there are of Scott's last name..