Goff-Putting Your Money Where your mouth is... | Page 4

WildBill · 2016-03-03T14:46:40-08:00

Okay there are some who are absolutely in love with Goff and swear that he is a franchise QB and we need to take him, others are okay if the Niner's take him, but would have the niner's go in another direction if certain players are available, then you have those who absolutely don't want Goff with the 7th pick. Which one are you? 1, 2, or 3? So for posterities sake without saying why he is good or bad or who you would rather pick or slamming another's decision, Just say which one of the three camps you are in? So we can look back and say who wanted who or what without having to dig through the tons of pages in the other Goff thread as its hard to keep track of what everyone wanted (although some stand out more than others). I'll start, I am in camp 2.

Mar 4, 2016 at 5:50 AM

#46

TexasDuck
Veteran
Posts: 942

From listening to someone I respect a lot talk to me about the way Goff processes on the field, I think the 49ers should target him above all other players, so I would be a 1.

Mar 4, 2016 at 8:18 PM

#47

genus49
Moderator
Posts: 28,327

I want Goff more than any other guy in this draft...whatever number that is to you.

Mar 4, 2016 at 8:51 PM

#48

NinerSickness
Member
Posts: 8,897

Camp 1. Goff is a franchise QB. You don't pass on a franchise QB. I don't care if you have Aaron Rodgers; you don't pass on a franchise QB.

I'm a huge Connor Cook fan, but I want Goff too.

Mar 4, 2016 at 8:55 PM

#49

Memphis9er
Veteran
Posts: 12,598

If he's there at #7, you take him. You don't trade away needed picks to move up, you take BPA if he's gone and grab Dak Prescott in the late 2nd, early third.

Mar 5, 2016 at 12:08 AM

#50

NinerSickness
Member
Posts: 8,897

Originally posted by Memphis9er:
If he's there at #7, you take him. You don't trade away needed picks to move up, you take BPA if he's gone and grab Dak Prescott in the late 2nd, early third.

Blaine Gabbert > Dak Prescott.

...maybe equal, but advantage Blaine.

[ Edited by NinerSickness on Mar 5, 2016 at 12:08 AM ]

Mar 5, 2016 at 1:48 AM

#51

Memphis9er
Veteran
Posts: 12,598

Originally posted by NinerSickness:

Originally posted by Memphis9er:
If he's there at #7, you take him. You don't trade away needed picks to move up, you take BPA if he's gone and grab Dak Prescott in the late 2nd, early third.

Blaine Gabbert > Dak Prescott.

...maybe equal, but advantage Blaine.

Thanks for your opinion!

Mar 5, 2016 at 6:41 AM

#52

genus49
Moderator
Posts: 28,327

Originally posted by NinerSickness:
Blaine Gabbert > Dak Prescott.

...maybe equal, but advantage Blaine.

Right now yes...3 years from now I think that gets reversed.

Mar 5, 2016 at 8:19 AM

#53

SanFranFanfrmVa
Veteran
Posts: 3,320

1) If Goff is there at number 7 you draft him. If not u take the BPA and improve your roster. What I don't want to do is to draft a Prescott or some other clown just to draft a QB. After Wentz/Goff and maybe Lynch the rest look to be at best backup QB's. After those 3 there isn't any QB prospect better then CK or Blaine Gabbert in my opinion.

Mar 5, 2016 at 8:36 AM

#54

Phoenix49ers
Veteran
Posts: 132,103

Originally posted by SanFranFanfrmVa:
1) If Goff is there at number 7 you draft him. If not u take the BPA and improve your roster. What I don't want to do is to draft a Prescott or some other clown just to draft a QB. After Wentz/Goff and maybe Lynch the rest look to be at best backup QB's. After those 3 there isn't any QB prospect better then CK or Blaine Gabbert in my opinion.

The guy that teams are raving about due to his intelligence and QB IQ is a "clown".....cool story.

Mar 5, 2016 at 9:21 AM

#55

jreff22
Veteran
Posts: 67,317

Mar 5, 2016 at 9:25 AM

#56

Stevec9932
Veteran
Posts: 4,269

Mar 5, 2016 at 10:15 AM

#57

SanFranFanfrmVa
Veteran
Posts: 3,320

Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
The guy that teams are raving about due to his intelligence and QB IQ is a "clown".....cool story.

I was just using Prescott as an example. I don't want the 49ers wasting a pick on a flyer just for the sake of taking a QB. I'd rather take Goff with the #7 pick and then draft a d line player in the place of a developmental type QB. This is a deep d line class.

Mar 5, 2016 at 10:31 AM

#58

qnnhan7
Veteran
Posts: 35,124

Camp 2 for Small Hand Luke

Mar 5, 2016 at 11:09 AM

#59

tommyncal
Veteran
Posts: 1,458

1 . . . And they should trade up to get him. If Goff turns out to be as good as A Rodgers and becomes a franchise QB, who wouldn't be willing to give up draft picks to have that type of QB? If you say that he'll never be an A Rodgers, then, now, you are evaluating a QB and making a judgement call on how good you think he'll become. Which is the hard part. So, where is the greater risk, passing on a high rated QB or giving up multiple draft picks to acquire him? That's also assuming you 'hit' on those multiple picks. I understand the more picks you have the better your chances are to find a good player. However, if you pass, then you'll be guessing how high in the late 1st or early 2nd rounds will you have to go to get Cook, Lynch, Prescott, etc. And even then you'll probably have to include other draft picks. I just don't think you can wait and let the QB come to you. Too many teams need QB's. I bet Houston wished they had taken a chance on Bortles than that sure bet Clowney. And yes, that's hindsight, but a clear example of which is the greater risk.

Mar 5, 2016 at 11:10 AM

#60

Phoenix49ers
Veteran
Posts: 132,103

Originally posted by SanFranFanfrmVa:
I was just using Prescott as an example. I don't want the 49ers wasting a pick on a flyer just for the sake of taking a QB. I'd rather take Goff with the #7 pick and then draft a d line player in the place of a developmental type QB. This is a deep d line class.

How do you know they'd be drafting a guy "just for the sake of taking a QB." What if it turns out that they really happen to like that quarterback.