Originally posted by birdie2bogey:
Don't most top QB prospects have rough adjustment periods? They still get drafted high
Most top guys start year one...the A.Rodgers of this world are few.
There are 432 users in the forums
Originally posted by birdie2bogey:
Don't most top QB prospects have rough adjustment periods? They still get drafted high
Originally posted by jcs:
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
If one of these guys seems likely to become an All Pro passer down the road with some coaching, they could very well be worth it even if they don't play much their first year. Evaluators need to project what these guys are going to look like in their scheme, with some time and coaching, what they will be capable of in a year, three years, five years...etc. I think Trubisky, Watson, Kizer and Mahomes all can be successful given the right coaching and the right talent around them.
That could be true of anyone drafted in any round, It doesn't mean only the top 1st round qb's are capable of this. The key to the top 5 is that you're expecting a certain level of skill that will make the transition to NFL starter easy. If the objective is to sit the rookie for a season or more then draft someone with better value later and use that higher pick on someone that can provide an immediate impact.
Originally posted by TheBlueHell:
Originally posted by Kolohe:We don't really know what Trubisky has a problem with due to such a limited sample size. Everyone was creaming themselves over Watson after the first Bama game headed into this season without any concerns about scanning anything (hell I linked a video from his first start as a freshman vs UNC ironically when Trubisky actually played a few series where Watson tossed 6 TDs including a couple of great instances of deep accuracy and manipulating coverages while reading), yet now we're all suddenly concerned after watching him bring home a title and slaughter two NFL defenses in Bama/ Ohio St.
Trubisky and Peterman have no problem scanning the field, can't say that about a few of the top QB's in this draft.
Originally posted by eastcoast49ersfan:This is the thing I don't completely agree with...QB's are the hardest thing to evaluate and are not an exact science. Talent is always available later in the draft it's just a matter of finding it, developing it and committing to it. If what you said was the case there wouldn't be guys like D.Carr, Russel Wilson or Drew Brees. I mean the two guys we are rumored to want to trade fore weren't even first round picks in Cousins and Garrappolo.
QBs with elite tools don't tend to fall past the first round. Mahomes will probably be there for our 2nd round pick, because he's only 6'2 with smallish hands and is extremely raw coming from an Air Raid offense, but typically guys with that kind of arm talent get drafted early.
If a QB pans out, they're still a great value even if it takes them 2-3 years to become a starter. The argument for taking a developmental QB early instead of late is that you either think that QB has a higher probability of panning out (Trubisky, Watson) or you think they have a higher ceiling/more potential if they do pan out (Kizer, Mahomes). You can't just gamble and pick a bunch of late round QBs, because you only have a certain number of practice reps.
If Kyle Shanahan thinks Kizer or Trubisky has a decent shot at being be a top 10 QB in the league 3 years from now, you run to the podium to make that pick. It doesn't matter if they aren't ready to start right away, particularly because we're rebuilding and won't make the playoffs next year anyways.
Originally posted by jcs:
Originally posted by eastcoast49ersfan:This is the thing I don't completely agree with...QB's are the hardest thing to evaluate and are not an exact science. Talent is always available later in the draft it's just a matter of finding it, developing it and committing to it. If what you said was the case there wouldn't be guys like D.Carr, Russel Wilson or Drew Brees. I mean the two guys we are rumored to want to trade fore weren't even first round picks in Cousins and Garrappolo.
QBs with elite tools don't tend to fall past the first round. Mahomes will probably be there for our 2nd round pick, because he's only 6'2 with smallish hands and is extremely raw coming from an Air Raid offense, but typically guys with that kind of arm talent get drafted early.
If a QB pans out, they're still a great value even if it takes them 2-3 years to become a starter. The argument for taking a developmental QB early instead of late is that you either think that QB has a higher probability of panning out (Trubisky, Watson) or you think they have a higher ceiling/more potential if they do pan out (Kizer, Mahomes). You can't just gamble and pick a bunch of late round QBs, because you only have a certain number of practice reps.
If Kyle Shanahan thinks Kizer or Trubisky has a decent shot at being be a top 10 QB in the league 3 years from now, you run to the podium to make that pick. It doesn't matter if they aren't ready to start right away, particularly because we're rebuilding and won't make the playoffs next year anyways.
Originally posted by TheBlueHell:NFL Network dude just said Watson is "cutting Trubisky to ribbons" out there lol. DW4 looking great today.
Originally posted by Heroism:
I have no dog in this race. I've been critical of all the quarterbacks. With that said, it's not that close when I see these guys throw. One guy looks like an NFL quarterback already, and that's Watson.
He's clearly ahead of his peers and by far the most polished and refined quarterback from a mechanical stand point. He's very consistent with his throws. Entire body is in sync and the ball comes out effortlessly.
Originally posted by eastcoast49ersfan:
Agree that he's the most NFL ready of the top 4 QBs. He also has the weakest arm and is only marginally more athletic than some of the other QBs when some were expecting him to run in the 4.5 range. Watson probably has the highest floor and lowest ceiling of the top 4 guys.