Jack Conklin Mich St. LT | Page 4

Kolohe · 2015-10-29T23:43:46-07:00

With Tunsil and Stanley dominating their position as the #1 and #2 OT's in the upcoming draft, I like to look at other possibilities. Now I'm not sure where Conklin is really projected to be, I've seen 1st to 2nd round but of course things will be much clearer when or after the NFL Combine. What I like about Conklin is that he's a O-lineman with a mean streak, he completely walls off defenders in the passing game (when he's not late off the snap) and he's a mauler in the run game. Scouts project him to be more of a Right Tackle in the NFL, and that's EXACTLY what the 49ers need on the O-line. Now I don't know how well he'd fit as a Zone Blocker, but who cares, I'm hoping this coaching staff isn't in SF much longer, he certainly can't be any worse than Pears. Jack Conklin 6'6" 320 pounds LT Michigan St. Here he is matched up vs. Shawn Oakman, I think he gets beat once or twice, but overall did a solid job vs. him. Here he is vs. a solid Ohio St. D-line, I thought he did a solid job in the running game. From Rotoworld.com n NFC area scout was surprised at Michigan State redshirt junior T Jack Conklin's lack of athleticism. "After studying Michigan State, I'm surprised at how average (offensive tackle) Jack Conklin was athletically," the scout said. "I guess I just expected more based on his reputation. He's a good player, though. (He's a) better player than athlete, which isn't a bad thing." The so-so athleticism is why some believe Conklin is ticketed for RT in the pros. Make no mistake, though: This is a quality player. Conklin is a terrific run blocker who has allowed just two sacks over the past two seasons. From NFLDraftScout.com STRENGTHS: Conklin is well-built with excellent core strength, using his powerful upper body and center of gravity to be a mauler in the run game. He lines up with a firm anchor and rarely plays in reverse with quick eyes and smarts to pick up extra blockers. Very quick-minded and never takes a play off. WEAKNESSES: Will get his feet tied up in his outside kick-slide, which forces him to fall off balance. Lacks the quick-twitch body control to always pick up edge speed. IN OUR VIEW: Some scouts are head-over-heels excited about his potential while others are simply lukewarm on his NFL future, but regardless, Conklin displays the "steady-eddie" skill-set and intangibles that should lead to a long pro career.

Apr 22, 2016 at 7:11 AM

#46

Sims19849ers
Veteran
Posts: 5,419

Originally posted by NYniner85:
I'd take Lawson over either RT personally...this draft Is light on pass rushers and we can find OTs thought out the draft and we are young at the position. This is Brooks last year and tanks (most likely) we need pass rushers with chips offense.

Give me Lawson and spriggs.

At 7 though? His arms aren't long enough for Baalke to take him at 7

Apr 22, 2016 at 7:23 AM

#47

NYniner85
Veteran
Posts: 119,171

Originally posted by Sims19849ers:

Originally posted by NYniner85:
I'd take Lawson over either RT personally...this draft Is light on pass rushers and we can find OTs thought out the draft and we are young at the position. This is Brooks last year and tanks (most likely) we need pass rushers with chips offense.

Give me Lawson and spriggs.

At 7 though? His arms aren't long enough for Baalke to take him at 7

Don't curr .25 inches short of 33 inches. literally that's his only knock. Explosive, has size and speed, already has a ton of pass rush moves, is a locker room leader, head is on straight, stud against the run as well as the pass etc

There's a reason they've brought him in and spoke to him a ton. Ideally I'd prefer a trade down, but if that can't happen I'd rather go pass rush than a RT. We are young on OL and I'm a Trent Brown homer

get some depth at OT with someone like Willie Beavers,Kyle Murphy,Fahn Cooper,Joe Haeg,Joe Dahl etc.

I could live with Lawson and Joshua Garnett with our first two picks... if we could trade with someone like the Titans (who want a OT) or the Phins (love Zeke) and still get Lawson that would be ideal too

Apr 22, 2016 at 7:28 AM

#48

Sims19849ers
Veteran
Posts: 5,419

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Sims19849ers:

Originally posted by NYniner85:
I'd take Lawson over either RT personally...this draft Is light on pass rushers and we can find OTs thought out the draft and we are young at the position. This is Brooks last year and tanks (most likely) we need pass rushers with chips offense.

Give me Lawson and spriggs.

At 7 though? His arms aren't long enough for Baalke to take him at 7

Don't curr .25 inches short of 33 inches. literally that's his only knock. Explosive, has size and speed, already has a ton of pass rush moves, is a locker room leader, head is on straight, stud against the run as well as the pass etc

There's a reason they've brought him in and spoke to him a ton. Ideally I'd prefer a trade down, but if that can't happen I'd rather go pass rush than a RT. We are young on OL and I'm a Trent Brown homer get some depth at OT with someone like Willie Beavers,Kyle Murphy,Fahn Cooper,Joe Haeg,Joe Dahl etc.

I could live with Lawson and Joshua Garnett with our first two picks... if we could trade with someone like the Titans (who want a OT) or the Phins (love Zeke) and still get Lawson that would be ideal too

I agree. I do think they brought him in just in case a guy they want at 7 is not available and they find a trade down partner. I don't think Baalke plans on taking him at 7 but, never know. Hell they might want to take him after a trade down but can't find a partner so end up being stuck at 7 and taking him anyways

. At the end of the day, I'd be fine with Lawson. A stud player at a position of need, I'm all on board for

Apr 22, 2016 at 7:36 AM

#49

NikeSBHead
Member
Posts: 4,538

Seems like Kiper is back on the juice, know'm sayion'?

Apr 22, 2016 at 7:47 AM

#50

HarbaughzDeep
Member
Posts: 682

Would be very upset with Conklin at 7. Definite reach for a RT.

Apr 22, 2016 at 8:12 AM

#51

LasVegasWally
Veteran
Posts: 24,886

Originally posted by Heroism:
Kiper called him the most underrated prospect in the entire draft.

Give me Jack Conklin all day over Ronnie Stanley.

I'm w/you on that.

Apr 22, 2016 at 8:31 AM

#52

crew
Veteran
Posts: 805

Originally posted by LasVegasWally:
Originally posted by Heroism:
Kiper called him the most underrated prospect in the entire draft.

Give me Jack Conklin all day over Ronnie Stanley.

I'm w/you on that.

Agree, believe Niners feel the same way about Conklin, wouldn't be surprised if he was the pick at #7, especially if Ravens take Buckner at #6.

Apr 22, 2016 at 8:47 AM

#53

NYniner85
Veteran
Posts: 119,171

Originally posted by crew:

Originally posted by LasVegasWally:

Originally posted by Heroism:
Kiper called him the most underrated prospect in the entire draft.

Give me Jack Conklin all day over Ronnie Stanley.

I'm w/you on that.

Agree, believe Niners feel the same way about Conklin, wouldn't be surprised if he was the pick at #7, especially if Ravens take Buckner at #6.

if they do feel this way that haven't shown anything...Conklin was on the radio the other day talking about every team that he's spoke to in some sort of fashion and SF was not one of them.

Not saying he's not the pick but I would be very surprised if the was the pick at 7, personally I don't think they will draft a RT at 7. Baalke yesterday spoke about the youth on the OL and how they are finally getting their NFL strength.

I see Lawson or whichever defensive player drops being the pick, unless we trade down.

Who knows could all be a smokescreen (really getting tired of hearing that word) lol.

Apr 22, 2016 at 9:03 AM

#54

BuZzB05
Veteran
Posts: 3,615

.......

[ Edited by BuZzB05 on Apr 22, 2016 at 9:51 AM ]

Apr 22, 2016 at 9:09 AM

#55

Joecool
Veteran
Posts: 70,984

Originally posted by BuZzB05:
I like Conklin than Stanley. The white guys are best for Olines like Cowboys and New England. The black guys are best for defense line.. it is opportunity.

What'd he say?

Apr 22, 2016 at 9:11 AM

#56

49AllTheTime
Veteran
Posts: 73,000

Originally posted by Joecool:

Originally posted by BuZzB05:
I like Conklin than Stanley. The white guys are best for Olines like Cowboys and New England. The black guys are best for defense line.. it is opportunity.

What'd he say?

he said Conklin is the best Tackle in the draft, which i agree

Apr 22, 2016 at 9:16 AM

#57

evil
Veteran
Posts: 46,740

Originally posted by BuZzB05:
I like Conklin than Stanley. The white guys are best for Olines like Cowboys and New England. The black guys are best for defense line.. it is opportunity.

Orlando Pace, Jonathan Ogden, Walter Jones, Gene Upshaw and Art Shell all say you don't know what the fudge you are babbling about. Also the Cowboys starting left tackle is not a white guy.

Apr 22, 2016 at 9:33 AM

#58

49er_Rider
Veteran
Posts: 4,558

Source indicated #Dolphins have a strong interest in Michigan State OT Jack Conklin as possible pick at No. 13. We shall see.

Apr 22, 2016 at 9:38 AM

#59

lamontb
Veteran
Posts: 33,335

Guess we shouldn't ask Buzz if blacks should be allowed to play qb

Apr 22, 2016 at 9:42 AM

#60

BuZzB05
Veteran
Posts: 3,615

....

[ Edited by BuZzB05 on Apr 22, 2016 at 9:51 AM ]