There are 703 users in the forums
Myles Jack ILB UCLA
Browse 49ers books and videos
Jan 10, 2016 at 6:36 PM
- walker807
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,401
7 is too high for him. if you could trade back and grab Jack & Wentz and im happy.
Jan 10, 2016 at 7:20 PM
- eastcoast49ersfan
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,112
Originally posted by walker807:
7 is too high for him. if you could trade back and grab Jack & Wentz and im happy.
Disagree. CBS has him ranked 5th. There's a dropoff after Bosa, Tunsil, and Ramsey (I'd probably throw Goff in there as well). Stanley may be better than him, but I consider him one of the top 7 prospects ahead of Treadwell, Buckner, and Hargreaves. He was ranked neck and neck with Jaylon Smith prior to Smith's injury - he's a little shorter, but may be even more athletic and is really good in coverage. It fills a need for us too (inside linebacker who doesn't suck in coverage).
Jan 10, 2016 at 7:31 PM
- Since07
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,377
Originally posted by shmuck:Originally posted by WRATHman44:A big weakness for us through the years has been covering TEs. I don't think Jack has the length for that job, so we'd need to be prepared to pass that job to Tartt or Johnson.
Disagree. Jack is one of the best cover linebackers to come out in years.
I was seeing him line up in the slot at times
Jan 10, 2016 at 8:15 PM
- Jcool
- Veteran
- Posts: 44,526
Originally posted by eastcoast49ersfan:
Originally posted by walker807:
7 is too high for him. if you could trade back and grab Jack & Wentz and im happy.
Disagree. CBS has him ranked 5th. There's a dropoff after Bosa, Tunsil, and Ramsey (I'd probably throw Goff in there as well). Stanley may be better than him, but I consider him one of the top 7 prospects ahead of Treadwell, Buckner, and Hargreaves. He was ranked neck and neck with Jaylon Smith prior to Smith's injury - he's a little shorter, but may be even more athletic and is really good in coverage. It fills a need for us too (inside linebacker who doesn't suck in coverage).
CBS is one of the weaker sites when it comes to the draft.
Jan 10, 2016 at 8:21 PM
- joaosoarrs99
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,096
Originally posted by Jcool:Originally posted by eastcoast49ersfan:Originally posted by walker807:7 is too high for him. if you could trade back and grab Jack & Wentz and im happy.
Disagree. CBS has him ranked 5th. There's a dropoff after Bosa, Tunsil, and Ramsey (I'd probably throw Goff in there as well). Stanley may be better than him, but I consider him one of the top 7 prospects ahead of Treadwell, Buckner, and Hargreaves. He was ranked neck and neck with Jaylon Smith prior to Smith's injury - he's a little shorter, but may be even more athletic and is really good in coverage. It fills a need for us too (inside linebacker who doesn't suck in coverage).
CBS is one of the weaker sites when it comes to the draft.
Matt Miller had Jack at #6.
Jan 10, 2016 at 10:29 PM
- 9er_84
- Veteran
- Posts: 644
Member Milestone:
This is post number 600 for 9er_84.
My draft crush- Myles jack has something that can't be taught-field vision. Which comes in handy when he was playing RB for UCLA. Kid is just like Willis and Bow in that he can find a crease through traffic and get to the ball. I'm not saying he is Bow or Willis but they both have that skill set and so does he.
Jan 10, 2016 at 10:55 PM
- 49ers808
- Veteran
- Posts: 16,632
Originally posted by shmuck:Originally posted by joaosoarrs99:Originally posted by zonkers:Haha BowJack Horsemen
Jack is a Willis-type who likes to run.
Willis seem to be stronger IMO.
Jack's surprisingly strong for his size. He has no problem running up and hitting the Oline. In fact he hits so hard he even sends lineman backwards. My biggest issue with Jack is if he's long enough to keep blockers away from his chest and how well he'll be able to disengage blockers in the NFL. He struggles when blockers get to his chest.
Agreed, that's his only weakness in my opinion. I wouldn't be mad at all with him because he's one of the surefire picks in this draft. I actually think Dallas is looking at him really hard, yes that high
Jan 11, 2016 at 3:41 PM
- communist
- Veteran
- Posts: 12,475
so, which is strong then?Originally posted by Jcool:Originally posted by eastcoast49ersfan:Originally posted by walker807:7 is too high for him. if you could trade back and grab Jack & Wentz and im happy.
Disagree. CBS has him ranked 5th. There's a dropoff after Bosa, Tunsil, and Ramsey (I'd probably throw Goff in there as well). Stanley may be better than him, but I consider him one of the top 7 prospects ahead of Treadwell, Buckner, and Hargreaves. He was ranked neck and neck with Jaylon Smith prior to Smith's injury - he's a little shorter, but may be even more athletic and is really good in coverage. It fills a need for us too (inside linebacker who doesn't suck in coverage).
CBS is one of the weaker sites when it comes to the draft.
Jan 14, 2016 at 4:57 AM
- shmuck
- Veteran
- Posts: 885
Originally posted by communist:
Originally posted by Jcool:so, which is strong then?
Originally posted by eastcoast49ersfan:
Originally posted by walker807:
7 is too high for him. if you could trade back and grab Jack & Wentz and im happy.
Disagree. CBS has him ranked 5th. There's a dropoff after Bosa, Tunsil, and Ramsey (I'd probably throw Goff in there as well). Stanley may be better than him, but I consider him one of the top 7 prospects ahead of Treadwell, Buckner, and Hargreaves. He was ranked neck and neck with Jaylon Smith prior to Smith's injury - he's a little shorter, but may be even more athletic and is really good in coverage. It fills a need for us too (inside linebacker who doesn't suck in coverage).
CBS is one of the weaker sites when it comes to the draft.
I would also disagree with the notion that CBS is a weak site for draft content. Although their team needs analysis leaves something to be desired, their scouting reports and player evaluation are on point. In fact Rang has to be one of the best in the business at player evaluations (at least by media standards).
Jan 14, 2016 at 5:06 AM
- shmuck
- Veteran
- Posts: 885
Roto's big board has Jack at #1
http://www.rotoworld.com/articles/cfb/59648/325/nfl-draft-rankings-big-board
http://www.rotoworld.com/articles/cfb/59648/325/nfl-draft-rankings-big-board
1. UCLA LB Myles Jack
Where He Wins: The complete package at the position, and a complete linebacker is as valuable as it has ever been. Jack's movements are uncommon. His lower half swivels when adjusting to what is in front of him, and his first steps are explosive and springy, quickly eating up ground to make a play others cannot. Jack is equally as aggressive between the tackles as he is in coverage. At UCLA, he was even asked to play opposite receivers and did not look out of place in coverage. Jack is a foundation piece to build with and around.
Jan 14, 2016 at 4:30 PM
- Shalynch
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,092
I think Jack in Chip Kelley Defense would be the best fit IMO dude can flat out cover so athletic and tackling machine
Jan 14, 2016 at 8:52 PM
- MrCrab49ers
- Veteran
- Posts: 608
I want Myles Jack. Go niners!!!
Jan 14, 2016 at 8:56 PM
- Escobar
- Veteran
- Posts: 716
yeah CBS is one of the best site, but really just go to draftbreakdown and watch the vids, judge for yourself
Jack would be a safe pick... I really want Tunsil, but that's looking less likely
Jack would be a safe pick... I really want Tunsil, but that's looking less likely
Jan 14, 2016 at 8:58 PM
- jreff22
- Veteran
- Posts: 67,317
Originally posted by Harbaalke:I think Jack in Chip Kelley Defense would be the best fit IMO dude can flat out cover so athletic and tackling machine
What is Chip Kelleys defense?
Jan 14, 2016 at 9:59 PM
- Hoovtrain
- Veteran
- Posts: 34,983
I want this guy. Would be happy with he , Buckner or Stanley. But I think they can shore up DL and OL via FA