Originally posted by genus49:
I'm honestly confused by your point...who should Houston have drafted instead of Clowney? Bortles? Watkins?
The year they drafted Clowney they were 7th in points allowed and 24th in yards allowed. This past season was the first year they were actually #1 D in points allowed and that was with Watt being injured. I would say if Watt was healthy along with Clowney we don't know what happens vs the Pats or if they even have to play on the road.
Their biggest issue was easily the QB position and nobody here will deny that it starts with that in terms of need and impact. If we take a QB at #2 i don't think anyone can(or should) complain given the HC we have in place. RB at #2 is a totally different story.
Mike Evans, Odell Beckham if you just dug a little deeper. Hell Bottles with an offensive mind like O'Brien may not be a bad pick. Someone who can reign his to's. Yes, you're right that Clowney helped due to a freak injury to Watt but you're not drafting #1 for that. When Watt is healthy they're forced to play Clowney at de where he's barely even a factor.

RBs that were good for a couple seasons then went on to do a bunch of s**t....because that's what the position is. Yes please can we draft a RB at two cause their just such an amazing track record of HOFs there.