There are 587 users in the forums
Travisty13's 2015 Mock Draft #1
Mar 28, 2015 at 7:12 PM
- strickac
- Veteran
- Posts: 15,176
4 WRs would be overkill. I wouldn't be thrilled with either of the first two picks. They both seem like reaches to me.
Mar 28, 2015 at 7:17 PM
- Travisty13
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,267
Originally posted by strickac:
4 WRs would be overkill. I wouldn't be thrilled with either of the first two picks. They both seem like reaches to me.
Reading helps. It's 2 WRs (Lockett and Greenberry). Lippett is a conversion project. And Williams is an UDFA. And Owamagbe is ranked about #22 most places. Really think Baalke cares about rankings if his guy is there?And I explained I think Marpet will go higher than expected.
[ Edited by Travisty13 on Mar 28, 2015 at 7:18 PM ]
Mar 28, 2015 at 8:06 PM
- genus49
- Moderator
- Posts: 28,150
Nice effort but imo it's too project heavy and Lockett while he can certainly help doesn't give us what we need most at this point which is a big redzone target now that we have Torrey the speed guy isn't as key. And drafting guys to convert them definitely screams project.
Mar 28, 2015 at 8:22 PM
- Travisty13
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,267
Originally posted by genus49:
Nice effort but imo it's too project heavy and Lockett while he can certainly help doesn't give us what we need most at this point which is a big redzone target now that we have Torrey the speed guy isn't as key. And drafting guys to convert them definitely screams project.
You must not know Baalke well. He loves projects. Bowman was a 4-3 OLB, Culliver a FS more than a CB, Bruce Miller a DE, Kilgore a T (now a C), Okoye a rugby/discus thrower, Haynes a rugby player. The only real projects I have is Lippett. You could throw Hodges in there, but he's played ILB so it's nothing new to him. And maybe Marpet who'll have to push inside to be a G.
Also, in regards to Lockett, he'd not just a speed guy. He's a slot receiver to get open with his speed a move the chains when's nothing's there. He's also on of the top return men. I'm not drafting him to run go runs all game. And I think drafting a guy solely for being a big RZ guy is a waste. Maybe Baalke thinks the play calling was the RZ problem and not the players.
[ Edited by Travisty13 on Mar 28, 2015 at 8:27 PM ]
Mar 28, 2015 at 8:36 PM
- genus49
- Moderator
- Posts: 28,150
Originally posted by Travisty13:
You must not know Baalke well. He loves projects. Bowman was a 4-3 OLB, Culliver a FS more than a CB, Bruce Miller a DE, Kilgore a T (now a C), Okoye a rugby/discus thrower, Haynes a rugby player. The only real projects I have is Lippett. You could throw Hodges in there, but he's played ILB so it's nothing new to him. And maybe Marpet who'll have to push inside to be a G.
Also, in regards to Lockett, he'd not just a speed guy. He's a slot receiver to get open with his speed a move the chains when's nothing's there. He's also on of the top return men. I'm not drafting him to run go runs all game. And I think drafting a guy solely for being a big RZ guy is a waste. Maybe Baalke thinks the play calling was the RZ problem and not the players.
Who is this Baalke character?
Converting a 4-3 OLB to an ILB is now comparable to moving a WR to corner? Not everyone is a Richard Sherman waiting to happen. The team is no longer the cream of the talent crop. We need guys who can help now. 3 of your first 5 picks are projects...maybe not position change guys but players who need time to develop into NFL contributors.
Don't get me wrong I like those players but to me it's a bad fit right now. Baalke knows we need results or his job is in jeopardy. He may address some project guys later in the draft but not with your 1st and 2nd rounders and some in the 4th round.
Mar 28, 2015 at 9:04 PM
- Travisty13
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,267
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by Travisty13:
You must not know Baalke well. He loves projects. Bowman was a 4-3 OLB, Culliver a FS more than a CB, Bruce Miller a DE, Kilgore a T (now a C), Okoye a rugby/discus thrower, Haynes a rugby player. The only real projects I have is Lippett. You could throw Hodges in there, but he's played ILB so it's nothing new to him. And maybe Marpet who'll have to push inside to be a G.
Also, in regards to Lockett, he'd not just a speed guy. He's a slot receiver to get open with his speed a move the chains when's nothing's there. He's also on of the top return men. I'm not drafting him to run go runs all game. And I think drafting a guy solely for being a big RZ guy is a waste. Maybe Baalke thinks the play calling was the RZ problem and not the players.
Who is this Baalke character?
Converting a 4-3 OLB to an ILB is now comparable to moving a WR to corner? Not everyone is a Richard Sherman waiting to happen. The team is no longer the cream of the talent crop. We need guys who can help now. 3 of your first 5 picks are projects...maybe not position change guys but players who need time to develop into NFL contributors.
Don't get me wrong I like those players but to me it's a bad fit right now. Baalke knows we need results or his job is in jeopardy. He may address some project guys later in the draft but not with your 1st and 2nd rounders and some in the 4th round.
Don't think Owamagbe is a project at all. He's very scheme versatile in fact. So I don't consider him a project. All he needs, in my opinion, is to add bulk some. Marpet, maybe a project considering the competition he played against, but if you plug him next to Staley, think he'll do very well. The real projects are at the end of the draft (Greenberry, Bausby, Russell). The only true project I believe I have in the first half of my draft is Lippett and I think he could be a very good CB. Marcus Cooper was nothing as a WR/CB at Rutgers and everyone on this board flipped out when KC took him and he played well as a rookie. Lippett has at least shown he can play well at CB in the limited time he's played there.
Mar 28, 2015 at 9:21 PM
- Quest4six
- The Q46 Dude
- Posts: 4,040
Originally posted by Travisty13:Originally posted by genus49:Originally posted by Travisty13:You must not know Baalke well. He loves projects. Bowman was a 4-3 OLB, Culliver a FS more than a CB, Bruce Miller a DE, Kilgore a T (now a C), Okoye a rugby/discus thrower, Haynes a rugby player. The only real projects I have is Lippett. You could throw Hodges in there, but he's played ILB so it's nothing new to him. And maybe Marpet who'll have to push inside to be a G.
Also, in regards to Lockett, he'd not just a speed guy. He's a slot receiver to get open with his speed a move the chains when's nothing's there. He's also on of the top return men. I'm not drafting him to run go runs all game. And I think drafting a guy solely for being a big RZ guy is a waste. Maybe Baalke thinks the play calling was the RZ problem and not the players.
Who is this Baalke character?
Converting a 4-3 OLB to an ILB is now comparable to moving a WR to corner? Not everyone is a Richard Sherman waiting to happen. The team is no longer the cream of the talent crop. We need guys who can help now. 3 of your first 5 picks are projects...maybe not position change guys but players who need time to develop into NFL contributors.
Don't get me wrong I like those players but to me it's a bad fit right now. Baalke knows we need results or his job is in jeopardy. He may address some project guys later in the draft but not with your 1st and 2nd rounders and some in the 4th round.
Don't think Owamagbe is a project at all. He's very scheme versatile in fact. So I don't consider him a project. All he needs, in my opinion, is to add bulk some. Marpet, maybe a project considering the competition he played against, but if you plug him next to Staley, think he'll do very well. The real projects are at the end of the draft (Greenberry, Bausby, Russell). The only true project I believe I have in the first half of my draft is Lippett and I think he could be a very good CB. Marcus Cooper was nothing as a WR/CB at Rutgers and everyone on this board flipped out when KC took him and he played well as a rookie. Lippett has at least shown he can play well at CB in the limited time he's played there.
Odigizuwa isn't a 4-3 OLB
At UCLA he played the role of a run stopping 3-4 DE (in their 3-4 scheme)
Not a project, probably the furthest thing from a project in terms of the most ready 3-4 DE in this draft
Mar 28, 2015 at 9:29 PM
- Travisty13
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,267
Originally posted by Quest4six:
Odigizuwa isn't a 4-3 OLB
At UCLA he played the role of a run stopping 3-4 DE (in their 3-4 scheme)
Not a project, probably the furthest thing from a project in terms of the most ready 3-4 DE in this draft
Exactly right. He's a plug and play guy. He only needs to add a little bulk (easily done on his frame) is his only knock to me. As long as his medicals check out, I'd take him in a minute. I only have him listed as "LB/DE" because alot of people think he could stand up and make a good OLB, but I think he's perfect as our 3-4 DE.
Mar 28, 2015 at 10:43 PM
- tatdwolf49
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,206
Ur right I hate it
I just cant see us drafting a 6'3 267lbs guy to play in our 3-4 D-line we'll have to wait at least a yr for him to add on weight and hope he can still play at a high level at a higher weight.. We need D-line help now not later im not counting on tha cowboy or on a 34 yr old Dockett with a busted knee ...
I just cant see us drafting a 6'3 267lbs guy to play in our 3-4 D-line we'll have to wait at least a yr for him to add on weight and hope he can still play at a high level at a higher weight.. We need D-line help now not later im not counting on tha cowboy or on a 34 yr old Dockett with a busted knee ...
Mar 28, 2015 at 11:31 PM
- Travisty13
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,267
Originally posted by tatdwolf49:
Ur right I hate itI just cant see us drafting a 6'3 267lbs guy to play in our 3-4 D-line we'll have to wait at least a yr for him to add on weight and hope he can still play at a high level at a higher weight.. We need D-line help now not later im not counting on tha cowboy or on a 34 yr old Dockett with a busted knee ...
We've done it before. Tank Carradine was drafted as at 6'4/276 to play on our 3-4 DL. Tank is now up to 295. I'm also of the opinion that Justin Smith comes back. So with Dockett, Smith, Carradine, TJE, and Dial we have good depth where we can put Odighizuwa on the field in certain situations and let him do his thing. Plus his rookie year will be the adding bulk year. Year 2, he takes over for Justin Smith.
Mar 29, 2015 at 12:23 AM
- LowerTheBoom
- Veteran
- Posts: 306
Originally posted by Travisty13:
You must not know Baalke well. He loves projects. Bowman was a 4-3 OLB, Culliver a FS more than a CB, Bruce Miller a DE, Kilgore a T (now a C), Okoye a rugby/discus thrower, Haynes a rugby player. The only real projects I have is Lippett. You could throw Hodges in there, but he's played ILB so it's nothing new to him. And maybe Marpet who'll have to push inside to be a G.
Also, in regards to Lockett, he'd not just a speed guy. He's a slot receiver to get open with his speed a move the chains when's nothing's there. He's also on of the top return men. I'm not drafting him to run go runs all game. And I think drafting a guy solely for being a big RZ guy is a waste. Maybe Baalke thinks the play calling was the RZ problem and not the players.
I know you put a lot of thought and effort into this and I respect when people do that.
All things considered... i'd be furious with the whole draft save Tyler Lockett and the UCLA DE.
Except I hate the idea of trying to make him a 5-technique. He looks athletic enough to maybe stand up and be a OLB/DE, but you don't draft 6-3, 270 lb guy on a maxed out frame and expect him to put on 20-30 lbs and play over a G.
And maybe some team will be foolled by the Ali Marpet hype and take him in the 2nd. Hope to God it's not us, considering he's 1) not as good of a prospect as the interior OL we drafted last year, and 2) D3 OL don't just step into the NFL and start. Maybe he is good, but there will be way too many impact players at positions of actual need for me to feel comfortable drafting a player whose only experience is playing a step above JUCO (even that is debatable).
Mar 29, 2015 at 12:43 AM
- ads_2006
- Veteran
- Posts: 64,425
drafting a guy with a medical history in the first round?
While Baalke maybe salivating over that fact, I think we actually pick someone healthy this year.
While Baalke maybe salivating over that fact, I think we actually pick someone healthy this year.
Mar 29, 2015 at 12:48 AM
- HarboutTHAT
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,074
I can dig it, liked how you through out a lot of guys I'm not familiar with.... That is what usually happens to me during a TB draft👌💯
Mar 29, 2015 at 12:49 AM
- Travisty13
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,267
Originally posted by LowerTheBoom:
I know you put a lot of thought and effort into this and I respect when people do that.
All things considered... i'd be furious with the whole draft save Tyler Lockett and the UCLA DE.
Except I hate the idea of trying to make him a 5-technique. He looks athletic enough to maybe stand up and be a OLB/DE, but you don't draft 6-3, 270 lb guy on a maxed out frame and expect him to put on 20-30 lbs and play over a G.
And maybe some team will be foolled by the Ali Marpet hype and take him in the 2nd. Hope to God it's not us, considering he's 1) not as good of a prospect as the interior OL we drafted last year, and 2) D3 OL don't just step into the NFL and start. Maybe he is good, but there will be way too many impact players at positions of actual need for me to feel comfortable drafting a player whose only experience is playing a step above JUCO (even that is debatable).
Owamagbe is far from maxed out in his frame. And for comparisons sake, Justin Smith came into the league weighing the same exact weight, Ray McDonald came in 276, Tank was 276. Don't see any problems with Owamagbe gaining weight. Plus til he adds weight, he still has enough power, technique, and speed to cause havoc.
And you can knock Marpet all you want for his competition, but he dominated that competition. When he went to the Senior Bowl, he showed he can hang with the "big boys". To me, he's a poor man's Zach Martin. I'd take that any day of the week.