Rep the Red & Gold: Shop 49ers Gear →

There are 1,122 users in the forums

4/23 UPDATE:::Jeff's THIRD Mock Draft

Browse 49ers books and videos
Very solid. not a single pick that looks poorly valued or undesirable.

I never looked at Chickillo as a potential rush LB... 43DE... 34DE... but now that you mention it, I can see the wisdom in it. The measurables... the 1.59 10-split... very cool.

Good job. Really solid picks Langford would be perfect for this team
Originally posted by Mr.Mcgibblets:
Very solid. not a single pick that looks poorly valued or undesirable.

I never looked at Chickillo as a potential rush LB... 43DE... 34DE... but now that you mention it, I can see the wisdom in it. The measurables... the 1.59 10-split... very cool.


I was thinking the same thing but when i saw him at the combine, he looked like a pretty good prospect to take a flier on. At best, since we do play a hybrid nickel often, he can at DE.


Originally posted by lamontb:
Good job. Really solid picks Langford would be perfect for this team

Thanks. I'm a fan of Langford's and it's a lot of hoping from me for him to be available for us in the 4th. I felt his performance at the combine really cemented him as a top-tier back, but he may be pushed to the 4th with all the other talent from DL to LBs
  • Kolohe
  • Hall of Fame
  • Posts: 67,462
I don't like it, where the heck is DGB!!!



Seriously very solid Mock, that definitely looks like a Baalke draft. But you're right though, Parker may very well be gone before the 15th pick, I'm gonna say the Bears to pair with Jeffery. And I would've taken Marcus Peters over Alex Carter if available of course.
Why isn't your 2nd 4th picks name in bold? That doesn't shout confidence like the others. Poor guy
This would be a very good draft.
  • 9moon
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 22,331
love the draft.. almost as good as mine!! lol

:)

except, I woulda drafted NATE MONTANA over a kid name Fajardo..
Overall very solid. If I had to nitpick, I'd say we likely wouldn't draft 2 CBs (probably re-sign Cox and/or Cook to go with Brock, Ward, Johnson, Reaser and Acker). Other than not being a huge fan of Chickillo at OLB, there's nothing to really complain about here.
Nice mock, Jeff. No major reaches and values are all pretty much in line. Like the Fajardo pick at the end of the draft. The Niners need some back up plan for Kaep.
Good and possible mock
I like it.
  • xcfan
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 3,046
Originally posted by 9moon:
love the draft.. almost as good as mine!! lol

:)

except, I woulda drafted NATE MONTANA over a kid name Fajardo..

nick is in this draft, not nate.
  • xcfan
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 3,046
Parker doesnt win against press much as much as i like.
  • crew
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 805
Originally posted by AsianJeff:
Originally posted by Mr.Mcgibblets:
Very solid. not a single pick that looks poorly valued or undesirable.

I never looked at Chickillo as a potential rush LB... 43DE... 34DE... but now that you mention it, I can see the wisdom in it. The measurables... the 1.59 10-split... very cool.


I was thinking the same thing but when i saw him at the combine, he looked like a pretty good prospect to take a flier on. At best, since we do play a hybrid nickel often, he can at DE.


Originally posted by lamontb:
Good job. Really solid picks Langford would be perfect for this team

Thanks. I'm a fan of Langford's and it's a lot of hoping from me for him to be available for us in the 4th. I felt his performance at the combine really cemented him as a top-tier back, but he may be pushed to the 4th with all the other talent from DL to LBs

After Langford's performance at the combine, I see him moving up from mid 4th Rd to upper 4th / mid 3rd Rd. If Niners want him they'll either have to trade up in the 4th and or more likely would have to use their 3rd Rd pick on him. My fave RBs for Niners to draft either Ajayi in the 2nd or Langford in the 3rd.
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone