Originally posted by SaksV:
Originally posted by CWin4949:
JJ Stokes was similar to Evans IMO. I think Evans has more talent, but the ceiling is about the same.
This
No its more kind of lazy to compare him to a former 49er bust.
There are 782 users in the forums
Browse 49ers books and videos
Originally posted by SaksV:
Originally posted by CWin4949:
JJ Stokes was similar to Evans IMO. I think Evans has more talent, but the ceiling is about the same.
This
Originally posted by NeonNiner:
If he's still around 10-15, I'd pull the trigger. We have enough picks to do it and he could be the big red zone threat we NEED.
Originally posted by eastcoast49ersfan:Originally posted by CWin4949:JJ Stokes was similar to Evans IMO. I think Evans has more talent, but the ceiling is about the same.
Stokes ran a 4.66 in private workouts which I'm sure was hand-timed. Evans ran a 4.53 at the combine with a slow start and poor technique. He can run faster than that. Stokes was also a little smaller than Evans and did not have the length, he was a couple years older when drafted and he was coming off an injury and dealt with injuries in the NFL.
http://blogs.mercurynews.com/49ers/2009/04/29/time-machine-49ers-were-thrilled-to-get-stokes-at-no-10-in-1995/
Originally posted by Jcool:Originally posted by SaksV:Originally posted by CWin4949:JJ Stokes was similar to Evans IMO. I think Evans has more talent, but the ceiling is about the same.
This
No its more kind of lazy to compare him to a former 49er bust.
Originally posted by CWin4949:Originally posted by Jcool:Originally posted by SaksV:Originally posted by CWin4949:JJ Stokes was similar to Evans IMO. I think Evans has more talent, but the ceiling is about the same.
This
No its more kind of lazy to compare him to a former 49er bust.
A bust???
Stokes wasn't Jerry Rice, and he sure as heck wasn't worth #10, but he did make some good plays for us and he did have his moments. I wouldn't call him a bust.
In the end it didn't even matter because we still walked away with the best WR in the draft that year in the third round...
Originally posted by Hoovtrain:
Originally posted by CWin4949:
Originally posted by Jcool:
Originally posted by SaksV:
Originally posted by CWin4949:
JJ Stokes was similar to Evans IMO. I think Evans has more talent, but the ceiling is about the same.
This
No its more kind of lazy to compare him to a former 49er bust.
A bust???
Stokes wasn't Jerry Rice, and he sure as heck wasn't worth #10, but he did make some good plays for us and he did have his moments. I wouldn't call him a bust.
In the end it didn't even matter because we still walked away with the best WR in the draft that year in the third round...
Agreed. He actually played pretty decent. He wasn't what everyone thought he should/would have been, but he was no slouch.
Originally posted by Jcool:Originally posted by Hoovtrain:Originally posted by CWin4949:Originally posted by Jcool:Originally posted by SaksV:Originally posted by CWin4949:JJ Stokes was similar to Evans IMO. I think Evans has more talent, but the ceiling is about the same.
This
No its more kind of lazy to compare him to a former 49er bust.
A bust???
Stokes wasn't Jerry Rice, and he sure as heck wasn't worth #10, but he did make some good plays for us and he did have his moments. I wouldn't call him a bust.
In the end it didn't even matter because we still walked away with the best WR in the draft that year in the third round...
Agreed. He actually played pretty decent. He wasn't what everyone thought he should/would have been, but he was no slouch.
When you are a top 10 pick (49ers traded up to get) who was expected to be a #1 WR, never had a thousand yard season despite playing with a HOF QB, only started over 10 games 3 times in your career then yes i would call him a bust.
Originally posted by SaksV:
Originally posted by CWin4949:
JJ Stokes was similar to Evans IMO. I think Evans has more talent, but the ceiling is about the same.
This
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:Originally posted by SaksV:Originally posted by CWin4949:JJ Stokes was similar to Evans IMO. I think Evans has more talent, but the ceiling is about the same.
This
Stokes was running in the 4.7 range. They are not comparable at all......
not true.Originally posted by FredFlintstone:Only wr we need to trade up for is Watkins
Originally posted by kray28:Hopefully Evans is a smokescreen to misdirect other teams from the 49ers' real target: Marqise Lee