Originally posted by Paul_Hofer:
Originally posted by GhostofFredDean74:
Originally posted by Paul_Hofer:
Originally posted by GhostofFredDean74:The controversy is at what cost. By your logic, don't the Niners need a solid young backup for Willis and Bowman and Aldon Smith? What about solid young backups for Kaep and VD?
Originally posted by Paul_Hofer:
Originally posted by blm7754:I think you're suffering the Webzone Super Bowl Retinal Burn. It involves believing that having a replacement for Justin in 2013 will make up for his injury in 2012.
Originally posted by Paul_Hofer:
Justin doesn't need replacing. Rather than selecting his replacement this year, the smarter route would be to trade out that selection into a higher pick in 2014.
He's only got 1 more year on contract, and retirement is on his radar.
"I'm not going to retire after this year," Smith said. "I would like to come back and try to get here (theSuper Bowl) again. I realize my career is definitely winding down. I'm not saying I'm going to play another eight years or something like that. I want to play at a high level."
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000133210/article/justin-smith-says-triceps-50-percent-torn-he-wont-retire
We need to develop a replacement now. It will take at least a year or two before ANY rookie is capable of performing at Justin's level.
Or, having a solid young backup might serve useful in the event he gets injured in 2013. Addressing the issue of Smith not having a legitimate backup shouldn't be very controversial.
If you seriously can't see the difference between drafting a backup for Justin Smith (who's closing in on the end of his career and only signed through 2013) and doing so for Willis, Bowman, Aldon, Kap, etc. (all much younger, and signed for longer or will be extended soon), than there's nothing I can do for you.
Btw, I'm not saying we absolutely need to use a high pick on a replacement for Justin...just that we need one. If the right guy is there at #31 or #34, they should make the pick...if they feel a corner or safety is a better selection that high, I'm cool with that too. I'm just saying, it's clear to me we need to think about a long-term replacement AND a short-term rotational solution for Justin.
It's good that I'm not asking you to do anything for me. If you're not asserting the need only "to think about" a long-term replacement and a short-term rotational solution (Have you heard of Dorsey?), then my job is done. Think about it in relation to the many other backup situations that would be useful to have.
I could be wrong, but Dorsey (who I have heard of, interestingly enough) was signed more to be a backup NT and not necessarily/primarily Justin's backup at the under-tackle position. And if that's the case, it's more critical for Dorsey to focus on that role given Ian Williams complete lack of NFL experience.
However, if the FO sees Dorsey as Justin's main backup, I agree that that particular issue is solved for 2013. That would mean a NT would be the more critical of the two positions to address. Bottom line, neither you nor I know for sure what they plan to do with Dorsey...I just won't pretend that I know for sure.