There are 461 users in the forums
Mock: Early run on OT's
Feb 28, 2010 at 4:53 PM
- SanDiego49er
- Veteran
- Posts: 52,415
We are not trading our 2011 1st rounder to New England no less...
Feb 28, 2010 at 4:53 PM
- YourHuckleberry
- Member
- Posts: 5,107
Love it, except for trading our 1st rounder next year for a 2nd rounder this year, that just doesn't make sense to me.
Feb 28, 2010 at 4:57 PM
- noobie
- Veteran
- Posts: 252
Hate any mock that gives up next years one, let alone next years one for a 2nd. Iupati at guard for the next decade? If we draft him I hope we leave him at guard and don't try to turn him into a project at RT.
Feb 28, 2010 at 4:59 PM
- Hopper
- Veteran
- Posts: 12,441
Giving up next year's first
Feb 28, 2010 at 4:59 PM
- noobie
- Veteran
- Posts: 252
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
We are not trading our 2011 1st rounder to New England no less...
They would have 3 first rounders if we did that.
Feb 28, 2010 at 5:14 PM
- SonocoNinerFan
- Veteran
- Posts: 17,610
I would normally agree that trading a future first is a bad idea. But by all accounts this is a loaded draft and as many as 20 juniors will go in the first round. This tells me that there will be some excellent Seniors (like Nate Allen) who are first round quality and are worth spending future #1.
Feb 28, 2010 at 5:14 PM
- znk916
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,285
It's such a deep safety class I don't see the need to mortgage the future just to grab Nate Allen.
Feb 28, 2010 at 5:17 PM
- toeknee
- Veteran
- Posts: 54,571
Nice I've been wanting to see a mock with a run on tackles, I'm cool with taking Spiller in that case.
and do you see Iupati starting right away or Baas becoming backup?
[ Edited by teeohh on Feb 28, 2010 at 17:18:18 ]
and do you see Iupati starting right away or Baas becoming backup?
[ Edited by teeohh on Feb 28, 2010 at 17:18:18 ]
Feb 28, 2010 at 5:26 PM
- SonocoNinerFan
- Veteran
- Posts: 17,610
Originally posted by teeohh:
Nice I've been wanting to see a mock with a run on tackles, I'm cool with taking Spiller in that case.
and do you see Iupati starting right away or Baas becoming backup?
I think if Iupati couldn't unseat Baas it would be a major disappointment. Baas is just around for insurance/depth at this point.
Feb 28, 2010 at 5:28 PM
- ninergold
- Veteran
- Posts: 846
I doubt some of those tackles will go that early. Williams can't be an LT and the Seahawks need to replace Jones.
No way I'd give up a #1 next year for a #2 now.
Lupati is a guard. I think the combines have shown that that's his position.
No way I'd give up a #1 next year for a #2 now.
Lupati is a guard. I think the combines have shown that that's his position.
Feb 28, 2010 at 5:38 PM
- SonocoNinerFan
- Veteran
- Posts: 17,610
Originally posted by noobie:
Hate any mock that gives up next years one, let alone next years one for a 2nd. Iupati at guard for the next decade? If we draft him I hope we leave him at guard and don't try to turn him into a project at RT.
Yeah . . . I'd expect him to be a left guard
Feb 28, 2010 at 5:42 PM
- tohara3
- Veteran
- Posts: 31,021
Originally posted by ninergold:
I doubt some of those tackles will go that early. Williams can't be an LT and the Seahawks need to replace Jones.
No way I'd give up a #1 next year for a #2 now.
Lupati is a guard. I think the combines have shown that that's his position.
Agree
Feb 28, 2010 at 6:08 PM
- Ninerjohn
- Veteran
- Posts: 67,449
I would be one unhappy Niner fan if we deal our first next year for a 2nd this year. That is just dumb in my opinion. I know teams do it from time to time but I just dont think its a smart move.
Mar 1, 2010 at 5:20 AM
- mayo49
- Veteran
- Posts: 65,216
I like your Spiller, Iupati picks.