[ Edited by English on Mar 15, 2017 at 12:10 PM ]
There are 348 users in the forums
STUBBY-BY Mock Draft 1.0
Mar 15, 2017 at 12:09 PM
- English
- Moderator
- Posts: 41,375
Sorry Stubs but that is a suicide trade. The Cleveland one, only just noticed the second trade
Mar 15, 2017 at 4:22 PM
- eastcoast49ersfan
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,112
Originally posted by English:
Sorry Stubs but that is a suicide trade. The Cleveland one, only just noticed the second trade
We aren't likely to get a better one. I'm fully on board with trading the #2 pick for the #33 pick and a future 2nd round pick on a bad team. No one is going to offer us more than that.
I'm not even sure the Browns would offer that much when they could give up much less to trade up with the Jets to get Trubisky or stay at 12 and draft either Trubisky/Watson (whoever the Jets don't take in this scenario if the Jets decide to take a QB).
#12 is way too early to pick Harris in my opinion though. Foster/Watson would make more sense there in my opinion.
Mar 16, 2017 at 5:37 AM
- English
- Moderator
- Posts: 41,375
Originally posted by eastcoast49ersfan:Originally posted by English:Sorry Stubs but that is a suicide trade. The Cleveland one, only just noticed the second trade
We aren't likely to get a better one. I'm fully on board with trading the #2 pick for the #33 pick and a future 2nd round pick on a bad team. No one is going to offer us more than that.
I'm not even sure the Browns would offer that much when they could give up much less to trade up with the Jets to get Trubisky or stay at 12 and draft either Trubisky/Watson (whoever the Jets don't take in this scenario if the Jets decide to take a QB).
#12 is way too early to pick Harris in my opinion though. Foster/Watson would make more sense there in my opinion.
If this is the best offer, say no.
Mar 16, 2017 at 7:12 AM
- StubbyNBY
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,749
Originally posted by English:
If this is the best offer, say no.
And take who at #2?
Mar 16, 2017 at 7:58 AM
- English
- Moderator
- Posts: 41,375
Originally posted by StubbyNBY:Originally posted by English:If this is the best offer, say no.
And take who at #2?
Probably I would go Trubisky. Possibly Thomas who, in your mock, I could have picked up in the second round!
Mar 16, 2017 at 8:57 AM
- NinerBuff
- The Election Dude
- Posts: 21,443
Solomon Thomas not a first rounder?
Mar 16, 2017 at 9:57 AM
- StubbyNBY
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,749
Originally posted by NinerBuff:
Solomon Thomas not a first rounder?
Ugh. Good call. Totally forgot about him. About to edit
Mar 16, 2017 at 12:44 PM
- gored49
- Veteran
- Posts: 939
I like the results of your trades (though Barnett may not be the quick/athletic pass rusher we need) but I don't think it is realistic. The Browns are in the business of acquiring picks and I really think they have zero idea what they will do at qb. Their legit plan is probably to just wait and see what qb is available at 12 and take him no matter who it is: kizer, watson or trubisky.
Mar 19, 2017 at 8:27 AM
- evil
- Veteran
- Posts: 46,709
Originally posted by eastcoast49ersfan:Originally posted by English:Sorry Stubs but that is a suicide trade. The Cleveland one, only just noticed the second trade
We aren't likely to get a better one. I'm fully on board with trading the #2 pick for the #33 pick and a future 2nd round pick on a bad team. No one is going to offer us more than that.
I'm not even sure the Browns would offer that much when they could give up much less to trade up with the Jets to get Trubisky or stay at 12 and draft either Trubisky/Watson (whoever the Jets don't take in this scenario if the Jets decide to take a QB).
#12 is way too early to pick Harris in my opinion though. Foster/Watson would make more sense there in my opinion.
You are assuming the Jets don't want Trubisky themselves and that the Bills may not try and move up in front of their division rivals to get Trubisky.
Mar 19, 2017 at 8:31 AM
- evil
- Veteran
- Posts: 46,709
Originally posted by gored49:I like the results of your trades (though Barnett may not be the quick/athletic pass rusher we need) but I don't think it is realistic. The Browns are in the business of acquiring picks and I really think they have zero idea what they will do at qb. Their legit plan is probably to just wait and see what qb is available at 12 and take him no matter who it is: kizer, watson or trubisky.
That seems to imply that they will take a QB just to take one.