Kirk Cousins

I really hope we don't trade for that bum ass Kirk Cousins. Shanahan's love for him is starting to scare me. Like 👉🏻👌🏼 scary

Originally posted by braap49er:

I really hope we don't trade for that bum ass Kirk Cousins. Shanahan's love for him is starting to scare me. Like 👉🏻👌🏼 scary

His love for Cousins is why we don't have Mahomes or Watson. Definitely Watson at least, cause they spent a lot of time scouting him.

Originally posted by FL9er:
On one hand, I'm like:



Then the more I let it marinate:

Not for almost $60M in FGTD money...get that s**t out of here lol.

Niner fans are starving for even marginal QB play, that we will trick ourselves to think Kirk is worth it

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
I'm not so sure Jed cares that much about about "real money" when it comes to trying to make the 49ers win. Remember all the head coaches he was paying at once because he kept firing them?

Oh yeah, trading to 3: it's ALMOST going to cost as much as trading for Watson... might as well go for the established borderline future Hall of Famer. What is it, one more first? Maybe an additional second as well?

Because you can bet your sweet ass that several other teams are going to try to get to 3, which will raise the price even more — and that's assuming the Jets don't take him (leaving Fields - hey, I like Fields, but trading to 3 for him? That's a lot. Again might as well try for Watson at that point).

In what world is trading to #3 gonna cost 3 1sts rd pick a multiple other picks/players? Stop it. NO one is throwing out RG3 trades anymore.

You're throwing out every worst case scenario to make yourself believe Kirk is worth it lol.

Good if the Jets get Wilson, go get Sam for cheaper. Already have a pretty good connection in NYJ.

Kirk is NOT worth trading for. His contract is f**king garbage. He's only marginally better than Jimmy. We aren't winning a SB with Kirk and that's what you're paying for...along with losing vets. There's literally no benefit of doing it.

Hell No! Every off season this keeps getting brought up, enough is enough.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

I'm not so sure Jed cares that much about about "real money" when it comes to trying to make the 49ers win. Remember all the head coaches he was paying at once because he kept firing them?

Oh yeah, trading to 3: it's ALMOST going to cost as much as trading for Watson... might as well go for the established borderline future Hall of Famer. What is it, one more first? Maybe an additional second as well?

Because you can bet your sweet ass that several other teams are going to try to get to 3, which will raise the price even more — and that's assuming the Jets don't take him (leaving Fields - hey, I like Fields, but trading to 3 for him? That's a lot. Again might as well try for Watson at that point).

In what world is trading to #3 gonna cost 3 1sts rd pick a multiple other picks/players? Stop it. NO one is throwing out RG3 trades anymore.

You're throwing out every worst case scenario to make yourself believe Kirk is worth it lol.

Good if the Jets get Wilson, go get Sam for cheaper. Already have a pretty good connection in NYJ.

Kirk is NOT worth trading for. His contract is f**king garbage. He's only marginally better than Jimmy. We aren't winning a SB with Kirk and that's what you're paying for...along with losing vets. There's literally no benefit of doing it.

I keep saying it but with 5-6 top QBs this year teams won't have to trade as much draft capital to trade up.

Gone be more like Josh Rosen then RG3.

Originally posted by Waterbear:
I keep saying it but with 5-6 top QBs this year teams won't have to trade as much draft capital to trade up.

Gone be more like Josh Rosen then RG3.

exactly.

side note


And I think he's just referring to his injures overall not the ankle.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Waterbear:

I keep saying it but with 5-6 top QBs this year teams won't have to trade as much draft capital to trade up.

Gone be more like Josh Rosen then RG3.

exactly.

side note

Whatever it's worth for my NFL peeps: severity of Jimmy Garoppolo injury is why 49ers are in market for QB, not just dissatisfaction. And don't completely dismiss Aaron Rodgers returning-to-Bay-Area rumors — don't know Aaron's thinking, but source says Niners have interest.

— Ric Bucher (@RicBucher) February 2, 2021

And I think he's just referring to his injures overall not the ankle.

I'd get a Rodgers jersey so fast lol

Originally posted by NYniner85:
Not for almost $60M in FGTD money...get that s**t out of here lol.

Niner fans are starving for even marginal QB play, that we will trick ourselves to think Kirk is worth it

i'm surprised you haven't gone crazy like you did with Staff lol

f**k no to Kurt suckins

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by NYniner85:
Not for almost $60M in FGTD money...get that s**t out of here lol.

Niner fans are starving for even marginal QB play, that we will trick ourselves to think Kirk is worth it

i'm surprised you haven't gone crazy like you did with Staff lol

Stafford for what was looking like 2nds and 2 3rds was a homerun trade IMO. He could be restructured as well. His $21M and $23M in 2021/2022 is much better than Kirk's $21M and $35M, no? And I don't care what the Kirk stans say, he can't hold Stafford's jock strap.

Originally posted by PRIMETIME21:
f**k no to Kurt suckins

He doesn't suck, he's not a ton better than Jimmy and he most certainly isn't worth $56M in FGTD cash. SF would still have the worst QB in the division.

GB ain't trading Rodgers no matter how bad 49ers fans want it or do they?

Originally posted by FL9er:

GB ain't trading Rodgers no matter how bad 49ers want it or do they?

fixed