Originally posted by 9moon:I don't see how Darnold is an improvement over Grappy..
Younger, bigger arm, and is mobile
There are 357 users in the forums
Originally posted by 9moon:I don't see how Darnold is an improvement over Grappy..
Originally posted by dmax:
Originally posted by 9moon:
I don't see how Darnold is an improvement over Grappy..
Younger, bigger arm, and is mobile
Originally posted by lamontb:
He didn't report any of this as things he's hearing. He simply thinks KS would make Darnold a much better qb.
Originally posted by Kolohe:
You left out injury prone, no winning record, has thrown more INT's than Jimmy G.. I'm good, might as well just stick with Rosen.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by Kolohe:
You left out injury prone, no winning record, has thrown more INT's than Jimmy G.. I'm good, might as well just stick with Rosen.
Whatever with Sam, but stop acting like he was put in any position to be successful in NJ.
You think Jimmy would have a winning record with that roster and Adam Gase as his HC? Not a f**king chance in hell.
I could see him having a Tannehill like revival with a new coaching staff and team...whether here or somewhere else, the talent is there.
Originally posted by TyCore:I noticed a couple members in the Garoppolo thread posting about going with whoever can get you 12 wins, which we know Jimmy can do.
I tend to agree with that position.
If you're going to wipe the slate clean, I can't imagine doing it with Darnold.
Originally posted by TyCore:Jimmy hasn't proved he can do it again
I noticed a couple members in the Garoppolo thread posting about going with whoever can get you 12 wins, which we know Jimmy can do.
I tend to agree with that position.
If you're going to wipe the slate clean, I can't imagine doing it with Darnold.
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by TyCore:Jimmy hasn't proved he can do it again
I noticed a couple members in the Garoppolo thread posting about going with whoever can get you 12 wins, which we know Jimmy can do.
I tend to agree with that position.
If you're going to wipe the slate clean, I can't imagine doing it with Darnold.
Originally posted by TyCore:i would too, but the talk of his replacement should win this amount of games is ridiculous.
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by TyCore:Jimmy hasn't proved he can do it again
I noticed a couple members in the Garoppolo thread posting about going with whoever can get you 12 wins, which we know Jimmy can do.
I tend to agree with that position.
If you're going to wipe the slate clean, I can't imagine doing it with Darnold.
Of course, very true.
But is that a reason to go all-in on Darnold?
If I was to hedge my bets, I'd go with Jimmy over Darnold.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by Kolohe:
You left out injury prone, no winning record, has thrown more INT's than Jimmy G.. I'm good, might as well just stick with Rosen.
Whatever with Sam, but stop acting like he was put in any position to be successful in NJ.
You think Jimmy would have a winning record with that roster and Adam Gase as his HC? Not a f**king chance in hell.
I could see him having a Tannehill like revival with a new coaching staff and team...whether here or somewhere else, the talent is there.
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by Kolohe:
You left out injury prone, no winning record, has thrown more INT's than Jimmy G.. I'm good, might as well just stick with Rosen.
Whatever with Sam, but stop acting like he was put in any position to be successful in NJ.
You think Jimmy would have a winning record with that roster and Adam Gase as his HC? Not a f**king chance in hell.
I could see him having a Tannehill like revival with a new coaching staff and team...whether here or somewhere else, the talent is there.
But Jimmie just wins! MUH WINNING RECORD! JIMMIE IS A WEENER!!! FEELS GOOD BABBY!!!!!!!!!!!!