Originally posted by Hardcoreniner559:
I wonder if the giants will come down on price though maybe a second and third ? ......can we realistically afford to pay obj though ?
No chance Giants come down to that lol
There are 540 users in the forums
Originally posted by Hardcoreniner559:
I wonder if the giants will come down on price though maybe a second and third ? ......can we realistically afford to pay obj though ?
Originally posted by DaBum:No chance Giants come down to that lol
Originally posted by Scottie15:We would basically have to outbid the Rams. Only way that happens is with the #9 pick
Originally posted by Niners99:Originally posted by titan:It looks like it would be OBJ if anything is to happen. I wonder how much it would cost?!
Two 1sts and a 100 mil extension. No thanks.
Originally posted by Hardcoreniner559:Not worth it
Originally posted by Scottie15:We would basically have to outbid the Rams. Only way that happens is with the #9 pick
Originally posted by bonafidejonb:I don't know if I want one or the other...as it won't guarantee a super bowl...but I'll gladly take both, if that makes any sense!
If we were to grab both, that would signify a push for a championship...and a smack in the face to the Rams!
Would you give up our first 3 picks this year to obtain both of them?
Originally posted by NYniner85:So sounds like Gronk is gonna play...also sounds like the main reason he wanted to retire is because of bill.
https://es.pn/2GrBOEU
Originally posted by cciowa:he is only 28. i like beck very much but not for two first round picks or some such nonsense. if you put a gun to my head. get gronk for a 4th. that is as high as i go.. i may be talked into a third. but thats a big maybe. if we trade gronk. then we get a nice rookie wide out on day two or three and call it goodOriginally posted by 49erminion:Originally posted by cciowa:Originally posted by pd24:Gronkowski would cost less in terms of draft picks and salary. I would go with Gronk.
agree ten fold
He's older and injury prone too.