Ricky Jean Francois | Page 14 | 49ers Webzone Forum

ElephantHaley · 2012-12-22T23:08:19-08:00

#95 is gonna start for #94 and to be honest, I do like Francois as a change of pace give a breather type rotation player. For some reason I do not remember him at LSU

Mar 2, 2015 at 7:26 AM

#196

cciowa
Veteran
Posts: 60,541

Originally posted by Frisco69ers:
can't believe he chose the fudge Skins over us lol

to say he chose us over them could indicate he had a offer from us,, i have seen no credible source to indicate that was the case.

Mar 2, 2015 at 7:31 AM

#197

Geeked
Veteran
Posts: 10,057

Originally posted by cciowa:

Originally posted by ninerfan4life:
This dude keeps getting overpaid

if we would have over payed him, some posters here who say we are cheap would have been happy. go figure

I love it, the "Cheap York" argument. 49ers have very little cap space because they're "cheap".

You know, here's the other thing, that whole cheap York thing came about when the team had to be transferred and was in Salary Cap purgatory. Of course the 49ers were cheap back then.... you have a thing called DEAD MONEY. And the whole, bringing in DE to HC because they wanted a cheap coach... well, if you're going to lose, you don't bring in a guy that's going to be great, you bring in a guy you don't mind letting go.

When you look at the history with 20/20 hindsight, you realize the whole cheap York argument is a complete load of BS started by people that don't understand NFL Roster Finances... kinda like Policy, as he is the author of the whole early to mid late 2000's MESS.

Mar 2, 2015 at 9:11 AM

#198

NCommand
Hall of Fame
Posts: 123,365

Originally posted by Geeked:

Originally posted by cciowa:

Originally posted by ninerfan4life:
This dude keeps getting overpaid

if we would have over payed him, some posters here who say we are cheap would have been happy. go figure

I love it, the "Cheap York" argument. 49ers have very little cap space because they're "cheap".

You know, here's the other thing, that whole cheap York thing came about when the team had to be transferred and was in Salary Cap purgatory. Of course the 49ers were cheap back then.... you have a thing called DEAD MONEY. And the whole, bringing in DE to HC because they wanted a cheap coach... well, if you're going to lose, you don't bring in a guy that's going to be great, you bring in a guy you don't mind letting go.

When you look at the history with 20/20 hindsight, you realize the whole cheap York argument is a complete load of BS started by people that don't understand NFL Roster Finances... kinda like Policy, as he is the author of the whole early to mid late 2000's MESS.

Yeah, started with JOHN York charging for water, etc. But once it was turned over to Jed, it's been anything BUT cheap...quite the opposite actually.

Mar 2, 2015 at 9:27 AM

#199

LasVegasWally
Veteran
Posts: 24,856

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by Geeked:

Originally posted by cciowa:

Originally posted by ninerfan4life:
This dude keeps getting overpaid

if we would have over payed him, some posters here who say we are cheap would have been happy. go figure

I love it, the "Cheap York" argument. 49ers have very little cap space because they're "cheap".

You know, here's the other thing, that whole cheap York thing came about when the team had to be transferred and was in Salary Cap purgatory. Of course the 49ers were cheap back then.... you have a thing called DEAD MONEY. And the whole, bringing in DE to HC because they wanted a cheap coach... well, if you're going to lose, you don't bring in a guy that's going to be great, you bring in a guy you don't mind letting go.

When you look at the history with 20/20 hindsight, you realize the whole cheap York argument is a complete load of BS started by people that don't understand NFL Roster Finances... kinda like Policy, as he is the author of the whole early to mid late 2000's MESS.

Yeah, started with JOHN York charging for water, etc. But once it was turned over to Jed, it's been anything BUT cheap...quite the opposite actually.

Truth!

Mar 2, 2015 at 10:00 AM

#200

btthepunk
Veteran
Posts: 23,305

Maybe we can get him next offseason after the Skins cut him.

Mar 2, 2015 at 10:42 AM

#201

Geeked
Veteran
Posts: 10,057

Originally posted by btthepunk:
Maybe we can get him next offseason after the Skins cut him.

No, someone else will pay him $4M... for now real good reason.

Mar 2, 2015 at 10:57 AM

#202

cciowa
Veteran
Posts: 60,541

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by Geeked:

Originally posted by cciowa:

Originally posted by ninerfan4life:
This dude keeps getting overpaid

if we would have over payed him, some posters here who say we are cheap would have been happy. go figure

I love it, the "Cheap York" argument. 49ers have very little cap space because they're "cheap".

You know, here's the other thing, that whole cheap York thing came about when the team had to be transferred and was in Salary Cap purgatory. Of course the 49ers were cheap back then.... you have a thing called DEAD MONEY. And the whole, bringing in DE to HC because they wanted a cheap coach... well, if you're going to lose, you don't bring in a guy that's going to be great, you bring in a guy you don't mind letting go.

When you look at the history with 20/20 hindsight, you realize the whole cheap York argument is a complete load of BS started by people that don't understand NFL Roster Finances... kinda like Policy, as he is the author of the whole early to mid late 2000's MESS.

Yeah, started with JOHN York charging for water, etc. But once it was turned over to Jed, it's been anything BUT cheap...quite the opposite actually.

you are preaching to the choir,, maybe you two could do a slide show presentation on this for the romper room sector of the webzone.