There are 480 users in the forums

Marshall, Morgan and Crabtree 09 starting recievers?

  • rubicon
  • Info N/A
Is it logical to try to send a few of our WR to denver for Marshall?

I say Hill and Battle for Marshall, or add a second day 2010 pick instead of Hill.

Just an idea what do you all think?
The above videos are auto-populated by an affiliate.
uhhh...

no.


ibtl
  • rubicon
  • Info N/A
what is your reasoning against it?
Originally posted by rubicon:
what is your reasoning against it?

That Denver would be high to have to take this trade. Hill and Battle for a probowl wide receiver? Really? That's the most asinine thing I have ever heard.
Originally posted by rubicon:
what is your reasoning against it?

Battle has no value and Hill is bot going to excite very many people. Denver would ask for a first day pick from us at the least, possibly one of our first rounders.

Really, we are fine at WR and I'd be very opposed to giving them a high draft pick because of Marshall's off the field problems and the fact that our picks would be better used towards getting a stud franchise QB to throw to Crabtree, Morgan Hill and Davis instead of adding to the WR core.

[ Edited by AllTimeGreat on Jun 16, 2009 at 15:07:39 ]
marshall is a dumbarse negro with no education or common sense in life. therefore I do not think that M. Singletary would want to deal with a grown man with fatherly issues. NFL is grown man's business dumbarses need not to apply and stay home. Plus we already have a full boat when it comes to receivers. so HELL to the motherfocken NO.
Originally posted by Negrodamus:
marshall is a dumbarse negro with no education or common sense in life. therefore I do not think that M. Singletary would want to deal with a grown man with fatherly issues. NFL is grown man's business dumbarses need not to apply and stay home. Plus we already have a full boat when it comes to receivers. so HELL to the motherfocken NO.

+1 on the general idea, though not necessarily the wording.

[ Edited by GoFD74 on Jun 16, 2009 at 15:10:58 ]
  • rubicon
  • Info N/A
Originally posted by itlynstalyn:
Originally posted by rubicon:
what is your reasoning against it?

That Denver would be high to have to take this trade. Hill and Battle for a probowl wide receiver? Really? That's the most asinine thing I have ever heard.

With all of his off the field trouble his value is diminished in my opinion. I would think that they are high to entertain letting him go at all after the losses they have suffered this off season.

The idea of the three of them on the field with the rest of the weapons we currently have on offense is scary to any defense.
  • bubbybristerHOF
  • Info N/A
there aint no way this would be like trying to herd cats
Member Milestone: This is post number 2,700 for valrod33.
Originally posted by bubbybristerHOF:
there aint no way this would be like trying to herd cats

what he said
  • rubicon
  • Info N/A
Originally posted by Negrodamus:
marshall is a dumbarse negro with no education or common sense in life. therefore I do not think that M. Singletary would want to deal with a grown man with fatherly issues. NFL is grown man's business dumbarses need not to apply and stay home. Plus we already have a full boat when it comes to receivers. so HELL to the motherfocken NO.

Good point. Plus there may not be enough balls to go around if there are that many alpha males on the field at once.
  • bubbybristerHOF
  • Info N/A
man nobody wants marshall on this team he doesnt fit and mike singletary would probably end up napoleon dynamiting his ass up against the lockers and whisper in his ear "Boy I'll slap you so hard, your clothes will be outta style."
  • bubbybristerHOF
  • Info N/A

you guys all fail

trade for marshall

then draft TIM TEBOW next year

omg omg omg omg omg omg omg


Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone