You do t need WR help and Paul Perkins adds ZERO to the trade.
So IMO you'd be trading away an asset (Kelly)for more depth at WR in which you don't NEED.
Now if you wanted to trade nelson and brown for Garcon just to have Garcon then have at it.
But giving up an RB3 for a WR(???) wouldn't be the best GM move IMO
There are 467 users in the forums
Trade assistance if possible
Sep 20, 2017 at 1:49 PM
- krizay
- Veteran
- Posts: 26,488
Sep 20, 2017 at 5:27 PM
- birdie2bogey
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,412
Originally posted by krizay:You do t need WR help and Paul Perkins adds ZERO to the trade.
So IMO you'd be trading away an asset (Kelly)for more depth at WR in which you don't NEED.
Now if you wanted to trade nelson and brown for Garcon just to have Garcon then have at it.
But giving up an RB3 for a WR(???) wouldn't be the best GM move IMO
My main thought was to have a better Flex option, but I tend to agree.
Thank you sir!