There are 407 users in the forums
Fantasy Defense Thread
Sep 2, 2011 at 10:28 AM
- valrod33
- Hall of Small
- Posts: 138,120
SF
Sep 2, 2011 at 11:01 AM
- TX9R
- Veteran
- Posts: 8,352
SF. Pitt is loaded on offense. Seattle is more likely to TO and get sacked. Scoring will likely be low in both games.
Sep 2, 2011 at 11:03 AM
- YungAce
- Veteran
- Posts: 46,920
SF. Easy
Sep 2, 2011 at 11:44 AM
- krizay
- Veteran
- Posts: 26,582
Well, I'd say Balt. Even though Roethlisberger looks like he's playing great right now. Balt still has a better chance to hold Pitt to 13 or less than SF has to hold Sea under 21. Just the point difference between that would lean me towards Balt. Then throw in Ben's tendacies to hold on to the ball too long.
Last year
week 4: 14 pts (without Ben)
week 13 (i belive) they scored 13 points (with Ben)
playoffs: while it did end up being a shootout with Pitt scoring 24 2nd half points. (31 total) Balt still had 5 sacks and 2 turnovers.
Until you see our defense plays I say the safe pick is Balt.
Last year
week 4: 14 pts (without Ben)
week 13 (i belive) they scored 13 points (with Ben)
playoffs: while it did end up being a shootout with Pitt scoring 24 2nd half points. (31 total) Balt still had 5 sacks and 2 turnovers.
Until you see our defense plays I say the safe pick is Balt.
Sep 5, 2011 at 6:35 PM
- SJniner7
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,749
Thanks for the input. I think I am going to go with SF. Just have a good feeling about this game.
Sep 5, 2011 at 8:20 PM
- Janitor
- HOF Food Reviews
- Posts: 49,068
packers defense vs. NO, or SF?
Sep 5, 2011 at 8:36 PM
- mod
- Veteran
- Posts: 42,463
Originally posted by Janitor:
packers defense vs. NO, or SF?
SF
Sep 5, 2011 at 10:13 PM
- Janitor
- HOF Food Reviews
- Posts: 49,068
Originally posted by modninerfan:
Originally posted by Janitor:
packers defense vs. NO, or SF?
SF
That's what I'm feeling too. Pack D is great, but so is NO. Seattle has a crappy offense, and Rice might not even play. Niners D is at least solid on the line.