There are 258 users in the forums
Originally posted by 9moon:
did you feel that way about Elliott before the draft??
Because at one point, I had us (49ers) taking Ez E with the 7th overall pick OVER Bucko and I also remember everyone laughed at my posts..
I wonder if you were one of them??
Originally posted by Draftology:
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by 9moon:
Feel free to share your opinions..
I think it's pretty obvious...how in the world do you think RB is the best option for this team at #2 overall?
You really enjoying what the Rams are doing? Not to mention they at least have a QB to groom and a pass rush in place. Or are you in the wait til next year camp....because that always works out as planned.
I wouldn't mind this pick at all. Would you pass on Adrian Peterson for Joe Flacco? I know that's very extreme, but Fournette really could be a Peterson-caliber running back. At this point, very few experts have high first round grades on any QB's. Obviously that could change (see Carson Wentz), but if there's a franchise-changing non-QB, I wouldn't want to pass on him in favor of a QB who we project to be an above-average NFL QB.
I would take Garrett, Fournette, or Peppers over any of the QB's at this point.
Originally posted by MadDog49er:
Fournette is overrated as an all-around prospect. I don't think he is top 5 value. I'd take Elliott 100/100 over LF
Originally posted by harryj:
Originally posted by Draftology:
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by 9moon:
Feel free to share your opinions..
I think it's pretty obvious...how in the world do you think RB is the best option for this team at #2 overall?
You really enjoying what the Rams are doing? Not to mention they at least have a QB to groom and a pass rush in place. Or are you in the wait til next year camp....because that always works out as planned.
I wouldn't mind this pick at all. Would you pass on Adrian Peterson for Joe Flacco? I know that's very extreme, but Fournette really could be a Peterson-caliber running back. At this point, very few experts have high first round grades on any QB's. Obviously that could change (see Carson Wentz), but if there's a franchise-changing non-QB, I wouldn't want to pass on him in favor of a QB who we project to be an above-average NFL QB.
I would take Garrett, Fournette, or Peppers over any of the QB's at this point.
im very confused byu the reaction here
anyone who watches or studeis college football cant be mad at Fournette pick
Originally posted by harryj:
Originally posted by MadDog49er:
Fournette is overrated as an all-around prospect. I don't think he is top 5 value. I'd take Elliott 100/100 over LF
i completely disagree
elliot i had very high and i do grant you he is a better all around player (pass blocking off the backfield) but Fournette is just on another level running the ball if he had dallas OL he would run over 2000 yards easily
would i take him at #2? yes i would there is no qb worth a top 5 pick this year amd we are not a qb away we need talent and he is just that
Originally posted by 9moon:
1. Cleveland Browns - Myles Garrett; DE - Texas AM
2. San Francisco 49ers - Leonard Fournette; RB - LSU
3. Chicago Bears - DeShaun Watson; QB - Clemson
Originally posted by 9ersLiferInChicago:
Originally posted by 9moon:
1. Cleveland Browns - Myles Garrett; DE - Texas AM
2. San Francisco 49ers - Leonard Fournette; RB - LSU
3. Chicago Bears - DeShaun Watson; QB - Clemson
Is that a joke?
no, are YOU??