49ERS @ EAGLES (WILDCARD) | Game-day Thread

Originally posted by Heroism:

Originally posted by pdc20:
If they don't want AJ Brown anymore, they can trade him to the Niners.
A physical, bully true WR1 with Shanahan and Purdy would do wonders for the offense.

trade one quitter for another?

I prefer a field quitter than a stay at home quitter!

Originally posted by AB81Rules:
Huh? How was Purdy not good? I don't get that one, makes zero sense, yeah he had 2 bad throws, but he played very very good, he's a top 10 QB, enough with the hate on him, at least he went out there and won the game, kept making plays where the f**k was Hurts? Also Shanhan a 5/10? Huh? He had a great gameplan, again I'm so sick of fans who hate on Brock & Kyle for the sake of hating on them, makes zero sense.

Also this was more to do with Saleh & the Eagles losing it? Huh? Yes I agree with Saleh, but again another fan or media guy saying it was the Eagles losing it, GTFOH with that crap, we're really gonna complain about not going for it on 4th down yet we won, it was the right call, make it a 3 pt lead, I swear some fans have no clue what the f**k they're talking about.

Wait, Jenning didn't do anything as a WR, he had a huge catch and run in the game, c'mon man, tell me you didn't watch the game without telling me you didn't watch it.

no, purdy was not good enough. 2 awful picks that could have costed the game

shanahan needs to thank saleh for the game. his offense had so many fruitless drives and conservative playcalling

i dont hate anybody. i root for them very hard. but i dont give a free pass to them. if you dont understand this, then you should take the blindfold of your eyes and let people who actually watched the game twice comment whatever the f**k they thought of it.

Originally posted by alwayssecond:
no, purdy was not good enough. 2 awful picks that could have costed the game

shanahan needs to thank saleh for the game. his offense had so many fruitless drives and conservative playcalling

i dont hate anybody. i root for them very hard. but i dont give a free pass to them. if you dont understand this, then you should take the blindfold of your eyes and let people who actually watched the game twice comment whatever the f**k they thought of it.

Just curious, but what QBs would you take over Brock?

Shanahan being conservative and choosing to kick the FG in the first half was the reason the Eagles had to score a TD at the end of the game.
Ask Liam Coen if it was a good idea to be aggressive and going on fourth and 2 in the first half instead of taking the 3 points.

Originally posted by pdc20:
Shanahan being conservative and choosing to kick the FG in the first half was the reason the Eagles had to score a TD at the end of the game.
Ask Liam Coen if it was a good idea to be aggressive and going on fourth and 2 in the first half instead of taking the 3 points.

Right, and take away the 3 pts, and the Eagles only need a FG to win the game, Kyle did the right thing to take the points, had the 49ers not converted then people would be b***hing and calling for Kyle to be fired, not that they already weren't doing that lol.

I don't get why fans act like we need to be aggressive every time we have a 4th and short, if we don't convert and don't get points then fans will want the HC fired, look how it worked for Coen? Sometimes being smart is better than being aggressive and not converting, again without the 3 pts the Eagles need just a FG, BTW the defense allowed them to get to the SF 21, down 23-19, had they been down 20-19, they kick the FG, we have what 38 seconds, maybe 39 to get a FG, no guarantee we get it, we did the right thing despite what fans want.

Originally posted by AB81Rules:
I don't get why fans act like we need to be aggressive every time we have a 4th and short, if we don't convert and don't get points then fans will want the HC fired, look how it worked for Coen? Sometimes being smart is better than being aggressive and not converting, again without the 3 pts the Eagles need just a FG, BTW the defense allowed them to get to the SF 21, down 23-19, had they been down 20-19, they kick the FG, we have what 38 seconds, maybe 39 to get a FG, no guarantee we get it, we did the right thing despite what fans want.

In the bears game, he needed to be aggressive. If he thinks the defense can not make the stop, be aggressive. But when he punted in the 4th qtr, i feel it was the right decision with 6 minutes to go.

But Seahawks and Eagles the D was making the stops, so take points.

Originally posted by jdt84_2:

Originally posted by AB81Rules:
I don't get why fans act like we need to be aggressive every time we have a 4th and short, if we don't convert and don't get points then fans will want the HC fired, look how it worked for Coen? Sometimes being smart is better than being aggressive and not converting, again without the 3 pts the Eagles need just a FG, BTW the defense allowed them to get to the SF 21, down 23-19, had they been down 20-19, they kick the FG, we have what 38 seconds, maybe 39 to get a FG, no guarantee we get it, we did the right thing despite what fans want.

In the bears game, he needed to be aggressive. If he thinks the defense can not make the stop, be aggressive. But when he punted in the 4th qtr, i feel it was the right decision with 6 minutes to go.

But Seahawks and Eagles the D was making the stops, so take points.

I agree, sometimes you need to be aggressive and sometimes be smart and take the points.

Originally posted by AB81Rules:
Just curious, but what QBs would you take over Brock?

so now you play the friendly side after insulting me and being the judge of who can give an opinion? f**k off

top 6, in no particular order

mahomes
stafford
jackson
allen
burrow
maye

2nd tier (7-16), in no particular order

hurts
purdy
love
williams
goff
daniels
herbert
nix
prescott
stroud

Originally posted by pdc20:
Shanahan being conservative and choosing to kick the FG in the first half was the reason the Eagles had to score a TD at the end of the game.
Ask Liam Coen if it was a good idea to be aggressive and going on fourth and 2 in the first half instead of taking the 3 points.

ask mccarthy if it was good to kick multiple fgs against seattle

ask the same about that bucs brady game

ask the same about our sb losses

ask the same about the bears vs packers

just because you found one example where it didnt work doesnt mean there arent many of them that showed it did

Originally posted by alwayssecond:

Originally posted by AB81Rules:
Just curious, but what QBs would you take over Brock?

so now you play the friendly side after insulting me and being the judge of who can give an opinion? f**k off

top 6, in no particular order

mahomes
stafford
jackson
allen
burrow
maye

2nd tier (7-15), in no particular order

hurts
purdy
love
williams
goff
daniels
herbert
nix
prescott

Wasn't playing friendly, wanted to see if you'd take Herbert over Brock when he's yet to win a playoff game, and has thrown what 7 INTs, was just wondering still think your take is ridiculous but whatever, just my 2 cents.

Originally posted by AB81Rules:
I don't get why fans act like we need to be aggressive every time we have a 4th and short, if we don't convert and don't get points then fans will want the HC fired, look how it worked for Coen? Sometimes being smart is better than being aggressive and not converting, again without the 3 pts the Eagles need just a FG, BTW the defense allowed them to get to the SF 21, down 23-19, had they been down 20-19, they kick the FG, we have what 38 seconds, maybe 39 to get a FG, no guarantee we get it, we did the right thing despite what fans want.

with our current situation, i much rather go for it everytime its 4th and short. 1 td beats 2 fgs, and our d, save for the last 2 weeks (and with plenty of help of the opposing teams) cannot stop anyone

if we would have prime warner, bosa, justin smith, willis or bowman out there, i could take my chances on d. now? it just seems we are giving the game away

only thing that changed was that the eagles gave it back to us last night

when you are THIS shorthanded, you have to go all in.

And to say this is all Saleh, or mostly thanks to Saleh is what I have a huge issue with, the defense was the one who allowed the Eagles to get down to the SF 21, gave us a horrible 15yard penalty when Hurts slid, but yet we should just say that this win is because of Saleh and we should have went for it on 4th and short where if we missed it we're only up 20-19, they have the ball at the SF 21, down 20-19, kick a FG, we end up with 40 seconds, no guarantee we go down to kick the game winning FG so getting the points in the 1st half was smart IMO, but that again is my 2 cents.

Originally posted by alwayssecond:

Originally posted by AB81Rules:
I don't get why fans act like we need to be aggressive every time we have a 4th and short, if we don't convert and don't get points then fans will want the HC fired, look how it worked for Coen? Sometimes being smart is better than being aggressive and not converting, again without the 3 pts the Eagles need just a FG, BTW the defense allowed them to get to the SF 21, down 23-19, had they been down 20-19, they kick the FG, we have what 38 seconds, maybe 39 to get a FG, no guarantee we get it, we did the right thing despite what fans want.

with our current situation, i much rather go for it everytime its 4th and short. 1 td beats 2 fgs, and our d, save for the last 2 weeks (and with plenty of help of the opposing teams) cannot stop anyone

if we would have prime warner, bosa, justin smith, willis or bowman out there, i could take my chances on d. now? it just seems we are giving the game away

only thing that changed was that the eagles gave it back to us last night

when you are THIS shorthanded, you have to go all in.

So would you go for it on 4th and short if we're on our own 35? Shanhan made the right choice, we got points, which helped us win, but keep b***hing about it when it worked out, had it not you'd be b***hing and wanting him fired, and you know it.

Originally posted by AB81Rules:
Wasn't playing friendly, wanted to see if you'd take Herbert over Brock when he's yet to win a playoff game, and has thrown what 7 INTs, was just wondering still think your take is ridiculous but whatever, just my 2 cents.

i dont like herbert and i dont get the hype about him, he is 2nd tier for me

ridiculous is the fact you cannot accept other views of people actually watching the games (and not now, but for the last 3 decades) and think you have the omniknowledge of the sport.

just my 2 cents