There are 443 users in the forums
Originally posted by 49erBigMac:
Originally posted by ninersrule4:
Originally posted by 49erBigMac:
We need to be bold with this, apparently the latest hold up is we're offering 3 years and he wants 5. I'd go 8! Loads of guaranteed money but really spread out. The kid is the real deal. Let's control his cap hits and stop him going back to the market.
Lol 8 years?
Why not?
Originally posted by 49erBigMac:
We need to be bold with this, apparently the latest hold up is we're offering 3 years and he wants 5. I'd go 8! Loads of guaranteed money but really spread out. The kid is the real deal. Let's control his cap hits and stop him going back to the market.
Originally posted by random49er:
Originally posted by 49erBigMac:
Originally posted by ninersrule4:
+ Show all quotes
Lol 8 years?
Why not?
Might wanna see a little more 1st?
Originally posted by random49er:
Risk involves cost as well. Alot moreso even.
How many teams are signing their QBs to 8+ yr contracts?
Originally posted by Silky:
Originally posted by bud49:
Brocks deal should have done been finished by now. When it comes to contracts this org. is terrible at getting things done.
I'm kind of glad it's not. I'm treating this year as a mini rebuild anyway. If Mac attack Jones ends up playing then so be it. I love Brocks work ethic and savvyness, but this needs to be a patient process. 50 mil plus is a lot to dish out annually
Originally posted by random49er:
Risk involves cost as well. Alot moreso even.
How many teams are signing their QBs to 8+ yr contracts?
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by random49er:
Risk involves cost as well. Alot moreso even.
How many teams are signing their QBs to 8+ yr contracts?
Who cares? Obviously however many years we decide on will not be fully guaranteed. This is something that you have failed to grasp this entire offseason. Most of a contract is window dressing. What difference does it make if we give him a 5 year contract with an easy out after year 3, or if we give him a 20 year contract with an easy out after year 3?
Originally posted by random49er:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by random49er:
Risk involves cost as well. Alot moreso even.
How many teams are signing their QBs to 8+ yr contracts?
Who cares? Obviously however many years we decide on will not be fully guaranteed. This is something that you have failed to grasp this entire offseason. Most of a contract is window dressing. What difference does it make if we give him a 5 year contract with an easy out after year 3, or if we give him a 20 year contract with an easy out after year 3?
The OP cared when he suggested an 8 year contract. There's nothing to grasp beyond that... lol. Its unnecessary.
btw... didnt u say he wont show up to workouts without a contract in hand? Or was that mini camps?
Because he's already done the former. There's a chance that that promise you made goes up in flames (if it already hasnt). We'll see though.
Originally posted by 49erBigMac:
Originally posted by random49er:
Originally posted by 49erBigMac:
+ Show all quotes
Why not?
Might wanna see a little more 1st?
At what cost though? He signs 3 year $150 mil contract. Cool, then Jayden Daniels, Bo Nix and Caleb and Drake Maye all start setting new marks on 2nd contracts, Herbert, Lawrence, Burrow sign deals for 65 mil per. Then what? Pay him that? Let him walk?
Surely we've seen enough, at least while we have Kyle he's the perfect QB for us, he gets the system and is a playmaker. An 8 year deal would look stupid now, no one would be saying that in a few years time.
Originally posted by Sanfran_chrisco:
when are we signing him?
Originally posted by Sanfran_chrisco:
when are we signing him?
Originally posted by Nastastical:
Originally posted by Sanfran_chrisco:
when are we signing him?
When he signs his name on the contract