QB Brock Purdy Thread

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SLCNiner:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SLCNiner:

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by bmvanthiel:
Make or break time for Purdy. I'm very curious to see how he responds.

During the crazy 12, 13 or whatever game start he had, it was awesome to watch his plays but knew we needed to wait until crap went bad to see who he really is. Now that some are off the bandwagon and even some asking about benching, we'll see who he really is with what he responds with.

No it isnt.

Sad as it may be, isn't really even make or break time for Wilks.

When is it make or brake, when we are out of playoff contention? Which by then is already too late to salvage the season

For Wilks or Brock? I would WISH this game was make or break for Wilks, just couldn't see any changes happening unless they were catalyzed by players frustration. I don't see any scenario where defensive Jimmy Raye is fired in season, unless spurred by a player revolt.

For both, wilks is a lot closer.

purdy, we'll it depends on his play. If he plays like he did the first 5 and still lose then he is safe and brings some type of comfort

Purdy has earned the right to be QB1 through the season with his previous play. If we miss the playoffs or lose because of him, maybe a reevaluation is in order. Wilks ain't earned s**t. If he takes a defense that was too 5 in every category and turns them into a liability, I'd hope Kyle would cut bait before it's too late. I think couple of guys who've been on the staff and know the players as well as the GOOD playbook could step in and at least get us back to good.

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by Bay2Bay9erAllday:

+1

there's a lot of that going around today

Yeah, like using age (32) a main reason why Jimmy's struggled this year...

I've never seen a poster so openly hypocritical in my life than you.

It's Trump levels of delusion, as in, if you don't address the clear contradiction accusations made about you, they can never pin you down on anything.

Jimmy does look pretty old and broken though.

You at least made some adjustments to your view of Jimmy, while faithful continues to put himself in a smaller and smaller box, making more and more excuses instead of acknowledging his flaws.

There is a Jimmy thread for the ciccle jerk.

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by DonnieDarko:

Originally posted by bmvanthiel:
Make or break time for Purdy.

What's wrong with that, this is a SB type team, let's get back in the win column. This is not a let's develop guys situation. We are in it to win it. We gotta win, or it's all on the table folks, that's what's going on here, doesn't matter what your name is, or what you did last season.

We have been in a SB window for a few years, and you tolerated mistakes from our previous QB without saying anything was make or break for him. And Purdy is playing at a high level, just has had a couple mistakes of late. There should be zero reason anyone thinks this is make or break time for Purdy. Zero. Its just humorous that you were ok with mistakes from our previous QB (made excuses even) who was a veteran with multiple years in our system, yet cant give our young potentially great QB anything close to the same rope.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by D0PEMAN:
optimistically Drew Brees
realistically Brock Brees

LOL

This is dumb, Flutie had more INTs than TDs in his first three years.

Fixed . I still believe 🎶

I'm ride or die Brock fan. I think he is unfairly judged as a finished product. His arm will never be elite and he will never run like Vick however each new D he sees is a learning curve, he is still so damn young people forget that cuz of his hot start. Let him gather a mental catalog of what is out there before moving on. If in a year he's still doing bonehead s**t then we can revisit Kirk Cousins haha.

He'll be fine.

Its an insult to what brock purdy has done for the last 10 games that people have to write posts to defend brock purdy.

Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Its an insult to what brock purdy has done for the last 10 games that people have to write posts to defend brock purdy.

I'm insulted he couldn't do nothing against teams who didn't have a winning record

Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Its an insult to what brock purdy has done for the last 10 games that people have to write posts to defend brock purdy.

This.



I love you Brock ❤️

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Its an insult to what brock purdy has done for the last 10 games that people have to write posts to defend brock purdy.

I'm insulted he couldn't do nothing against teams who didn't have a winning record

What? Purdys performance in the cleveland game and the first 55 minutes of the vikings game is the ONLY reason the games were even close.

Not only did he go toe to toe with two teams whose season depended on wins but he breathed some life into cardboard one dimensional game plans that couldn't put a pop warner team on their back foot.

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
The TOP against our defense is solely on how much time our offense is not eating up. we're not losing in shootouts, were losing because we can't move the ball and turning it over.

This is wrong. Just flat out wrong.

The 49ers are 4th in the entire league converting 3rd downs, converting at a 46.4% rate.

The 49ers are 21st in the entire league at stopping 3rd downs on defense, allowing a conversion 40.6% of the time (that number is slightly worse over our last 3 games).

lol, sounding like a Alex jimmy defender now i see.

did you even consider that we have the least 3rd down attempts ?

Avg 17 points a game in the last 3 games is not moving the ball

The offense tallied 460 yards in the last game.

yards don't count as points and it's doesn't tell the entire story.

moving the ball well would result in more points or at least more FG attempts if we can't capitalize on TDs

Yards aren't indicative of "Moving the Ball"?

I underlined the word "well" that you seemed to miss.

460 yards is 30 more than the average of the Dolphins, who are #1 in the NFL. Not sure what your definition of "well" is, but I think that's pretty good.

You're trying to force things too much. The definition of "well" can change,...depending on context.

If someone wants to argue that moving the ball between the both 30 yard lines was great all game,...but a team stunk within 30 yards of the goal line and were shut out,...that is 100% a fair argument for suggesting they didnt move the ball "well."

And in that specific scenario,...the yardage totals mean zilch. Context is everything. Cant crop it out of the post.

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
We have been in a SB window for a few years, and you tolerated mistakes from our previous QB without saying anything was make or break for him. And Purdy is playing at a high level, just has had a couple mistakes of late. There should be zero reason anyone thinks this is make or break time for Purdy. Zero. Its just humorous that you were ok with mistakes from our previous QB (made excuses even) who was a veteran with multiple years in our system, yet cant give our young potentially great QB anything close to the same rope.

I'll break it down, someone said make or break, that's the truth
we play Jags, Bucs, then Seattle, Eagles, then Seattle again
so this will decide our playoff seeding, or if we will participate
I expect us to MAKE, Brock included

but what he said was correct, this is make or break, if we play like the last 3 games and keep losing, I don't think with all this talent a outside looking in to the postseason, would be acceptable, I'm not talking only Brock here, more to the team at large

Understand I think we are getting a title this year, I predicted SF over MIA I stand by it

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
The TOP against our defense is solely on how much time our offense is not eating up. we're not losing in shootouts, were losing because we can't move the ball and turning it over.

This is wrong. Just flat out wrong.

The 49ers are 4th in the entire league converting 3rd downs, converting at a 46.4% rate.

The 49ers are 21st in the entire league at stopping 3rd downs on defense, allowing a conversion 40.6% of the time (that number is slightly worse over our last 3 games).

lol, sounding like a Alex jimmy defender now i see.

did you even consider that we have the least 3rd down attempts ?

Avg 17 points a game in the last 3 games is not moving the ball

The offense tallied 460 yards in the last game.

yards don't count as points and it's doesn't tell the entire story.

moving the ball well would result in more points or at least more FG attempts if we can't capitalize on TDs

Yards aren't indicative of "Moving the Ball"?

I underlined the word "well" that you seemed to miss.

460 yards is 30 more than the average of the Dolphins, who are #1 in the NFL. Not sure what your definition of "well" is, but I think that's pretty good.

You're trying to force things too much. The definition of "well" can change,...depending on context.

If someone wants to argue that moving the ball between the both 30 yard lines was great all game,...but a team stunk within 30 yards of the goal line and were shut out,...that is 100% a fair argument for suggesting they didnt move the ball "well."

And in that specific scenario,...the yardage totals mean zilch. Context is everything. Cant crop it out of the post.

I was waiting for somebody to mention the 460 yards -- which includes the bulls&t last drive shanny rolling the dice on his players for meaningless yards

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Getting a tad bit better is i guess a little more finished technically, but no one here would drop everything to get these guys is the point

Lots of teams would for Brock.

Lol ok, I'm not sure where that lines up with on the convo of 2021 QBs. But I agree lol

Sir, This is 5he Brock Thread and you were talking about him being done developing.

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by DonnieDarko:

Originally posted by bmvanthiel:

Make or break time for Purdy.

What's wrong with that, this is a SB type team, let's get back in the win column. This is not a let's develop guys situation. We are in it to win it. We gotta win, or it's all on the table folks, that's what's going on here, doesn't matter what your name is, or what you did last season.

We have been in a SB window for a few years, and you tolerated mistakes from our previous QB without saying anything was make or break for him. And Purdy is playing at a high level, just has had a couple mistakes of late. There should be zero reason anyone thinks this is make or break time for Purdy. Zero. Its just humorous that you were ok with mistakes from our previous QB (made excuses even) who was a veteran with multiple years in our system, yet cant give our young potentially great QB anything close to the same rope.

They aren't going to switch to Darnold as long as Brock is healthy.