rEVeNGe tOuR 2o2o

Originally posted by ChuckLeavy32:

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Originally posted by 9erguy:

Hindsight is 20/20

Even with hindsight we would still not having any kind of edge rush. He should throw in a Khalil Mack for Dante Pettis in his fantasy land

Now this is just dumb. We'd never give up Pettis for Mack. Now we should've taken the trade Mahomes for Pettis, makes more sense.

Mahomes without Hill would be a mistake we need an explosive downfield threat to optimize Mahomes arm strength. I bet the Raiders would give us Ruggs for Trent Taylor though

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Originally posted by 9erguy:

Hindsight is 20/20

Even with hindsight we would still not having any kind of edge rush. He should throw in a Khalil Mack for Dante Pettis in his fantasy land

Bro this ain't fantasy which one of these moves doesn't work for you ? all were very plausible and were probable had we acquired Brady the point of the thread was to show context on how we cost ourselves the team of a life time and all we had to do was say yes to the goat

Originally posted by 9erguy:
Hindsight is 20/20

amazing, isn't it? Also should've drafted Mahomes over Thomas. I can do it too.

How is this potato thread still up?

Originally posted by ilikecows699:

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Originally posted by 9erguy:

Hindsight is 20/20

Even with hindsight we would still not having any kind of edge rush. He should throw in a Khalil Mack for Dante Pettis in his fantasy land

Bro this ain't fantasy which one of these moves doesn't work for you ? all were very plausible and were probable had we acquired Brady the point of the thread was to show context on how we cost ourselves the team of a life time and all we had to do was say yes to the goat

You do realize the other team has to agree with the trade?

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Originally posted by ChuckLeavy32:

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Originally posted by 9erguy:

Hindsight is 20/20

Even with hindsight we would still not having any kind of edge rush. He should throw in a Khalil Mack for Dante Pettis in his fantasy land

Now this is just dumb. We'd never give up Pettis for Mack. Now we should've taken the trade Mahomes for Pettis, makes more sense.

Mahomes without Hill would be a mistake we need an explosive downfield threat to optimize Mahomes arm strength. I bet the Raiders would give us Ruggs for Trent Taylor though

Good call - maybe they can throw it that big tight end they have, just to be nice

Originally posted by ilikecows699:

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Originally posted by 9erguy:

Hindsight is 20/20

Even with hindsight we would still not having any kind of edge rush. He should throw in a Khalil Mack for Dante Pettis in his fantasy land

Bro this ain't fantasy which one of these moves doesn't work for you ? all were very plausible and were probable had we acquired Brady the point of the thread was to show context on how we cost ourselves the team of a life time and all we had to do was say yes to the goat

Why would we trade Ford and Alexander to the Colts when in the off season they were healthy? Why would we draft Clyde in the mid teens? Why would we want Fournette, Brown and Gronk. 1 is a bust 2 is a psychopath 3 is a shell of his former self and is just a red zone threat at this point of his career. Sure we could have had Brady but Jimmy had a better year prior to Brady so in the offseason it seemed like it would have been a lateral move or a down grade. Not gonna even talk about how we just wasted 2 first round picks on Adams for 1 f**king year cause our salary cap would be so f**ked we would be watching Adams, Warner, all our depth walking but hey at least we got Gilmore who's a man to man cornerback for this cover 3 defense f**k

Originally posted by ilikecows699:
All we had to do was say Yes. Everything else would have fell in line

Fact check any of these ✔

You forgot one: Powering up the Giza Pyramid power plants to provide lighting at Levi's Stadium

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Originally posted by ilikecows699:

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Originally posted by 9erguy:

Hindsight is 20/20

Even with hindsight we would still not having any kind of edge rush. He should throw in a Khalil Mack for Dante Pettis in his fantasy land

Bro this ain't fantasy which one of these moves doesn't work for you ? all were very plausible and were probable had we acquired Brady the point of the thread was to show context on how we cost ourselves the team of a life time and all we had to do was say yes to the goat

Why would we trade Ford and Alexander to the Colts when in the off season they were healthy? Why would we draft Clyde in the mid teens? Why would we want Fournette, Brown and Gronk. 1 is a bust 2 is a psychopath 3 is a shell of his former self and is just a red zone threat at this point of his career. Sure we could have had Brady but Jimmy had a better year prior to Brady so in the offseason it seemed like it would have been a lateral move or a down grade. Not gonna even talk about how we just wasted 2 first round picks on Adams for 1 f**king year cause our salary cap would be so f**ked we would be watching Adams, Warner, all our depth walking but hey at least we got Gilmore who's a man to man cornerback for this cover 3 defense f**k

You move Ford And Kwon due to make room for Gilmore Defo Sanders moron 🙄, and yes you make that trade 10 outta 10 times due to cap and injuries the two present all for a second round pick, and do you not see what the bucs are doing with the same weapons im presenting not to mention w Shannahans plays and the rest of our 49ers squad hence why you scoop fournette and gronk for the low.We woulda let Defo go after this year and Sherman to secure Adams long term idiot.. and yes Adams was in the mix to become a 49er during the off-season, and who gives about what coverage you play w Gilmore put em on an island and remain cover 3 he's an all pro who you work around

Originally posted by ilikecows699:

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Originally posted by ilikecows699:

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Originally posted by 9erguy:
Hindsight is 20/20

Even with hindsight we would still not having any kind of edge rush. He should throw in a Khalil Mack for Dante Pettis in his fantasy land

Bro this ain't fantasy which one of these moves doesn't work for you ? all were very plausible and were probable had we acquired Brady the point of the thread was to show context on how we cost ourselves the team of a life time and all we had to do was say yes to the goat

Why would we trade Ford and Alexander to the Colts when in the off season they were healthy? Why would we draft Clyde in the mid teens? Why would we want Fournette, Brown and Gronk. 1 is a bust 2 is a psychopath 3 is a shell of his former self and is just a red zone threat at this point of his career. Sure we could have had Brady but Jimmy had a better year prior to Brady so in the offseason it seemed like it would have been a lateral move or a down grade. Not gonna even talk about how we just wasted 2 first round picks on Adams for 1 f**king year cause our salary cap would be so f**ked we would be watching Adams, Warner, all our depth walking but hey at least we got Gilmore who's a man to man cornerback for this cover 3 defense f**k

You move Ford And Kwon due to make room for Gilmore Defo Sanders moron

Apologies to Hysterikal for the abuse this individual threw out. He is banned.