49ers vs. Raiders Tickets Available! →

There are 725 users in the forums

Brandon Aiyuk is a Quitter! Pick #25, 2020 NFL Draft

Shop Find 49ers gear online
Originally posted by Typecast:
Originally posted by VaBeachNiner:
Which we should have gotten done.

They had weeks to commit to the trade. I still believe they never wanted to trade Aiyuk. The 49ers bluffed hard and Aiyuk and his agent called them out on it. And they were right.

Aiyuk ended up accepting the deal the niners put on the table three weeks prior. So, if anything the niners intent on trading Aiyuk motivated him to finally accept.
Originally posted by SD49er:
Aiyuk ended up accepting the deal the niners put on the table three weeks prior. So, if anything the niners intent on trading Aiyuk motivated him to finally accept.

Agreed.
Trade him.

That is all.
Hope he stays and fully recovers. If he's traded, it just confirms the York are out of cash.
Originally posted by Predator85:
Hope he stays and fully recovers. If he's traded, it just confirms the York are out of cash.



this is the NFL no one is out of cash
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by Predator85:
Hope he stays and fully recovers. If he's traded, it just confirms the York are out of cash.



this is the NFL no one is out of cash

They spent 214mil for Leeds United in 2023, 345m on players in 2024, and pending buy of the Rangers for another 200+ mil in 2025. It wasn't a joke!
Originally posted by SD49er:
Aiyuk ended up accepting the deal the niners put on the table three weeks prior. So, if anything the niners intent on trading Aiyuk motivated him to finally accept.
No they didn't. Pelissero talked about what exactly happened in the last few weeks. Kyle went to Aiyuk, not the other way around. Kyle forced Paraag to give Aiyuk what he wanted. The 49ers sat on the Steelers offer for most of August. Aiyuk was fine with being traded because he was the one that brought the Steelers to the trade table.
[ Edited by Typecast on Mar 24, 2025 at 5:14 PM ]
Originally posted by Typecast:
They had weeks to commit to the trade. I still believe they never wanted to trade Aiyuk. The 49ers bluffed hard and Aiyuk and his agent called them out on it. And they were right.


Originally posted by Typecast:
No they didn't. Pelissero talked about what exactly happened in the last few weeks. Kyle went to Aiyuk, not the other way around. Kyle forced Paraag to give Aiyuk what he wanted. The 49ers sat on the Steelers offer for most of August. Aiyuk was fine with being traded because he was the one that brought the Steelers to the trade table.

I'm confused by who 'they' is referring to in the first post.

In the 2nd post, you mention Kyle forcing Paraag to give Aiyuk what he wanted… I'm wondering what you think the alternative would have been had he not done that. Trade seems pretty likely.
What is the offer the Browns are giving us? I would be fine with dealing his high salary away. He may never be the same. We ended up getting burned by the injury and big contract.
Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:
Originally posted by Typecast:
[The 49ers] had weeks to commit to the trade. I still believe [the 49ers] never wanted to trade Aiyuk. The 49ers bluffed hard and Aiyuk and his agent called them out on it. And [Aiyuk and his agent] were right.


Originally posted by Typecast:
No [the 49ers] didn't. Pelissero talked about what exactly happened in the last few weeks. Kyle went to Aiyuk, not the other way around. Kyle forced Paraag to give Aiyuk what he wanted. The 49ers sat on the Steelers offer for most of August. Aiyuk was fine with being traded because he was the one that brought the Steelers to the trade table.

I'm confused by who 'they' is referring to in the first post.

In the 2nd post, you mention Kyle forcing Paraag to give Aiyuk what he wanted… I'm wondering what you think the alternative would have been had he not done that. Trade seems pretty likely.
I clarified it for you in the quotes.

Yes. The other commenter is talking about how Aiyuk signed a deal that was on the table the entire time from the 49ers. That wasn't the case. The other commenter is talking about how Aiyuk agreed to the contract because he didn't want to be traded. That wasn't the case.
Originally posted by Typecast:
I clarified it for you in the quotes.

Yes. The other commenter is talking about how Aiyuk signed a deal that was on the table the entire time from the 49ers. That wasn't the case. The other commenter is talking about how Aiyuk agreed to the contract because he didn't want to be traded. That wasn't the case.

I got some answers to these questions after I read your post about Paraag in the Brock thread.

The poster didn't say Aiyuk's deal was there the entire time… he said it was there for three weeks. Whether that's correct or not I think it's safe to say Aiyuk wanted to be here and not be traded, pending they paid him his market value, and at least one part of the 49ers front office (the owner's right hand man) did want to trade him rather than pay him his market value (as you said in the Brock thread).

I don't think there's actually a disagreement here outside of how long Aiyuk's contract may have been on the table and other things that shouldn't need to be said (like Aiyuk would rather have stayed pending they paid him what he was worth).

It's tough to say the 49ers didn't want to trade him when arguably the biggest front office player did in fact want to trade him (rather than pay him appropriately).
Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:
Originally posted by Typecast:
I clarified it for you in the quotes.

Yes. The other commenter is talking about how Aiyuk signed a deal that was on the table the entire time from the 49ers. That wasn't the case. The other commenter is talking about how Aiyuk agreed to the contract because he didn't want to be traded. That wasn't the case.

I got some answers to these questions after I read your post about Paraag in the Brock thread.

The poster didn't say Aiyuk's deal was there the entire time… he said it was there for three weeks. Whether that's correct or not I think it's safe to say Aiyuk wanted to be here and not be traded, pending they paid him his market value, and at least one part of the 49ers front office (the owner's right hand man) did want to trade him rather than pay him his market value (as you said in the Brock thread).

I don't think there's actually a disagreement here outside of how long Aiyuk's contract may have been on the table and other things that shouldn't need to be said (like Aiyuk would rather have stayed pending they paid him what he was worth).

It's tough to say the 49ers didn't want to trade him when arguably the biggest front office player did in fact want to trade him (rather than pay him appropriately).

He wanted to be traded to a team of HIS choosing. That seems to have been the Steelers, but their offer wasn't good enough for the 49ers. The Patriots apparently made an offer that was good enough, but Aiyuk didn't want to go there so wouldn't sign an extension. I've said it numerous times, he wanted all of the perks of being an unrestricted free agent...while not being one. The epitome of entitlement.
Originally posted by RDB4216:
He wanted to be traded to a team of HIS choosing. That seems to have been the Steelers, but their offer wasn't good enough for the 49ers. The Patriots apparently made an offer that was good enough, but Aiyuk didn't want to go there so wouldn't sign an extension. I've said it numerous times, he wanted all of the perks of being an unrestricted free agent...while not being one. The epitome of entitlement.

Disagree completely but it doesn't matter anyway.

Some of our fans seem to have a real problem understanding negotiations are a two way street.
Originally posted by RDB4216:
He wanted to be traded to a team of HIS choosing. That seems to have been the Steelers, but their offer wasn't good enough for the 49ers. The Patriots apparently made an offer that was good enough, but Aiyuk didn't want to go there so wouldn't sign an extension. I've said it numerous times, he wanted all of the perks of being an unrestricted free agent...while not being one. The epitome of entitlement.

Which is why he should be traded and why we should NEVER yield to player demands again. Especially when they've FAILED to bring home a Lombardi
Originally posted by Pillbusta:
Which is why he should be traded and why we should NEVER yield to player demands again. Especially when they've FAILED to bring home a Lombardi

Uhhh so to stop players from holding out, we should trade them for whatever we can get, regardless of value, to prove a point?

This is even worse than holding out.
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone